Motivational factors influencing the adoption of frugal innovation among agrifood SMEs in Surakarta, Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(4).2026.10
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #4, pp. 143–159
- 14 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Agrifood SMEs play a vital role in producing high-value-added processed products, enhancing the potential of local agricultural commodities, and supporting food availability and diversity. However, these SMEs face various challenges, including limited resources and capital, the need to adapt to rapid innovation and shifting consumer preferences, and volatile purchasing power amid economic fluctuations. This study aims to analyze the motivational factors influencing the adoption of frugal innovation among agrifood SMEs in Surakarta City, Indonesia. A quantitative method was employed, involving a sample of 150 agrifood SMEs in Surakarta. Data were collected through surveys and direct interviews between April and June 2025. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with partial least squares (PLS) in SmartPLS 4. The majority of respondents’ businesses have been operating for less than 10 years and generate monthly revenue ranging from IDR 5,000,000 to IDR 40,000,000. The findings reveal that compatibility (ꞵ = 0.191, p < 0.05), low-cost manufacturing (ꞵ = 0.220, p < 0.05), digital platforms (ꞵ = 0.258, p < 0.05), sustainable leadership (ꞵ = 0.160, p < 0.05), technology turbulence (ꞵ = 0.188, p < 0.05), and external sources of knowledge (ꞵ = 0.172, p < 0.05) significantly encourage the adoption of frugal innovation. Moreover, external knowledge sources partially mediate the influence of sustainable leadership on the adoption of frugal innovation.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia, for funding this study with Contract No: 371/UN27.22/PT.01.03/2025.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O32, O33, L26, Q13
-
References50
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Path model diagram
-
- Table 1. Rule of thumb for outer model, structural model, and hypothesis testing
- Table 2. Factor loading, AVE, Cronbach’s alpha, and composite reliability
- Table 3. VIF and F-squared values
- Table 4. R2 and Q2 values
- Table 5. Bootstrapping
- Table A1. Demographic characteristics
- Table A2. Questionnaire
- Table B1. Fornell–Larcker
- Table B2. Heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT)
- Table B3. Cross-loading values
-
- Adana, A. H., Irham, Waluyati, L. R., & Utami, A. W. (2023). Intensity, purposes and drivers of digital technologies adoption: Lessons from shallot farmers at various agroecological zones in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 38(2), 84-91.
- Agarwal, N., Grottke, M., Mishra, S., & Brem, A. (2017). A systematic literature review of constraint-based innovations: State of the art and future perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(1), 3-15.
- Albert, M. (2022). Assessing the sustainability impacts of frugal innovation – A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, Article 132754.
- BPS. (2025). Kota surakarta dalam Angka 2025. [Surakarta City in Figures 2025]. BPS Statistics Surakarta Municipality, 49, 1-510. (In Indonesian).
- Calantone, R., Garcia, R., & Dröge, C. (2003). The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 90-103.
- Cuevas-Vargas, H., & Parga-Montoya, N. (2021). How ICT usage affect frugal innovation in Mexican small firms. The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 223-230.
- Cuevas-Vargas, H., Camarena, J. L., & Velázquez-Espinoza, N. (2022). Sustainability performance as a result of frugal innovation. The moderating effect of firm size. Procedia Computer Science, 214(C), 141-148.
- Cuevas-Vargas, H., Larios-Ferrer, J. L., Cruz-Ávalos, A. M., & Cossio-Vargas, E. (2023). Post-pandemic innovation practices in micro, small, and medium-sized firms in the state of Guanajuato. Modern Management Review, 28(4), 33-41.
- Dabic, M., Obradovic, T., Vlačić, B., Sahasranamam, S., & Paul, J. (2022). Frugal innovations : A multidisciplinary review & agenda for future research. Journal of Business Research, 142, 914-929.
- Dalati, S., Raudeliūnienė, J., & Davidavičienė, V. (2017). Sustainable leadership, organizational trust on job satisfaction: Empirical evidence from higher education institutions in Syria. Business, Management and Education, 15(1), 14-27.
- DINKOPUKM. (2025). Rencana Kerja Dinas Koperasi Ukm Dan Perindustrian Kota Surakarta Tahun 2025. [Work Plan of the Surakarta Municipal Office of Cooperatives, Small and Medium Enterprises, and Industry 2025]. Dinas Koperasi, Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah Dan Perindustrian Kota Surakarta. (In Indonesian).
- Donate, M. J., & Pablo, J. D. S. De. (2015). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 360-370.
- Dost, M., Pahi, M. H., Magsi, H. B., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Effects of sources of knowledge on frugal innovation: Moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1245-1259.
- Fauzan, I., Charina, A., Syamsiyah, N., Heryanto, M. A., & Saefudin, R. (2021). Tingkat Keberlanjutan Usaha Berbasis Pertanian dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya: Studi Kasus pada Bisnis UMKM Keluarga [The Level of Sustainability of Agriculture-Based Businesses and Its Determinants: A Case Study of Family-Owned Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)]. Agritekh (Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Teknologi Pangan), 1(02), 155-176. (In Indonesian).
- Gandasari, D. (2021). Analysis of innovation attributes in the innovation adoption of agricultural mechanization technology in farmers. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 19(01), 38-51.
- Ghozali, & Lathan. (2014). Partial least squares: Konsep, metode dan aplikasi menggunakan program WARPPLS 4.0. Edition 2 [Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods, and Applications Using WarpPLS 4.0 (2nd ed.)]. Universitas Diponegoro. (In Indonesian).
- Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modelling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square Edisi 2 [Structural Equation Modeling: An Alternative Method Using Partial Least Squares (2nd ed.).]. Universitas Diponegoro. (In Indonesian).
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). In L. Fargotstein, K. Offley, N. Tiwari, & G. Mahindra (Eds.), Women Entrepreneurs (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hossain, M. (2020). Frugal innovation: Conception, development, diffusion, and outcome. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, Article 121456.
- Hossain, M. (2021). Frugal innovation and sustainable business models. Technology in Society, 64, Article 101508.
- Kolawale, R., Lasisi, M., & Adeleke, A. (2017). Sustainability of marketing food crops through the internet in Lagis, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 21(1).
- Kusumawardhany, P. A., Baihaqi, I., & Karningsih, P. D. (2022). Frugal innovation in SMEs: Challenges and opportunities of doing more with less strategy. In 2022 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Conference – Asia Pacific, TEMSCON-ASPAC 2022 (pp. 48-53). Bangkok, Thailand.
- Lachowicz, M. J., Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2018). A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 244-261.
- Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Stewart, G. (2026). Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis. Journal of Information Science, 52(2), 429-450.
- Nassani, A. A., Sinisi, C., Mihai, D., Paunescu, L., Yousaf, Z., & Haffar, M. (2022). Towards the achievement of frugal innovation: Exploring major antecedents among SMEs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7), Article 4120.
- Nguyen, T. H., Le, X. C., & Vu, T. H. L. (2022). An extended technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework for online retailing utilization in digital transformation: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), Article 200.
- Ogbeibu, S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Gaskin, J., Senadjki, A., & Hughes, M. (2021). Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organisational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2421-2440.
- Pramono, J., & Ardiyansah, A. (2026, September). Public Policy Strategies for MSME Digital Transformation: Promoting Sustainable Economic Growth and Reducing Inequalities in Surakarta, Indonesia. In PROCEEDING ICTESS (International Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) (Vol. 8, pp. 148-168).
- Permatasari, B. Y., & Kesaulya, C. M. A. U. (2024). Penerapan innovation diffusion theory terhadap niat mengadopsi penggunaan fashionable medical scrub [Application of Innovation Diffusion Theory to the Intention to Adopt Fashionable Medical Scrubs]. TheJournalish: Social and Government Penerapan Innovation Diffusion Theory terhadap Niat Mengadopsi Penggunaan Fashionable Medical Scrub, 5, 95-105. (In Indonesian).
- Putri, L. R., Martini, M., & Hidayaht, A. N. (2024). Peran UMKM Sektor Pangan Dalam Meningkatkan Perekonomian Masyarakat Menengah Kebawah Kelurahan Kranji Bekasi Barat [The Role of Food Sector Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Improving the Economic Conditions of Lower-Middle-Income Communities in Kranji Subdistrict, West Bekasi]. Jurnal Ilmiah Dan Karya Mahasiswa, 2(3), 35-45. (In Indonesian).
- Rehman, K., Anwar, R. S., Antohi, V. M., Ali, U., Fortea, C., & Laura Zlati, M. (2024). Driving frugal innovation in SMEs: How sustainable leadership, knowledge sources and information credibility make a difference. Frontiers in Sociology, 9.
- Rosalina, A. I., Rosydah, R., Satiti, R., & Anggraini, L. (2023). Pembinaan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah Pangan Oleh Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan untuk Mendungukung Perkembangan Ekonomi [Development of Food Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) by the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM) to Support Economic Growth]. Cakrawala, 17(1), 37-54. (In Indonesian).
- Rossetto, D. E., Borini, F. M., Bernardes, R. C., & Frankwick, G. L. (2017). A new scale for measuring frugal innovation: The first stage of development of a measurement tool. In VI SINGEP–International Symposium on Project Management, Innovation, and Sustainability (pp. 1-16).
- Rogers, E. M., (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (Third Edition). The Free Press.
- Setyowati, N., Masyhuri, Mulyo, J. H., & Irham. (2024). Motivational factors and the impact of e-commerce adoption on business performance: Evidence from traditional drink SMEs in Indonesia. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(3), 1689-1700.
- Stöber, L. F., Sommer, D., & Ebersberger, B. (2022). The impact of frugal innovation on sustainability: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 26(08).
- Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D [Quantitative, Qualitative, and Research and Development (R&D) Research Methods]. Alfabeta. (In Indonesian).
- Suharti, L., Soegiono, L., & Purwati, Y. (2014). Technology innovation adoption model among SME tempe producer (A study on tempe producer in Jawa Tengah, Indonesia). International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(2), 5-14.
- Tian, H., & Wang, A. (2023). Sustainable leadership, knowledge sharing, and frugal innovation: The moderating role of organizational innovation climate. SAGE Open, 13(4).
- Tiwari, R., & Bergmann, S. (2018). What pathways lead to frugal innovation ? Some insights on modes & routines of frugal, technical inventions based on an analysis of patent data in German auto components industry. Working Paper TUHH, 49(105), 1-23.
- Tuijl, E., & Knorringa, P. (2023). Frugal innovation and digital platforms. In Handbook on Frugal Innovation (pp. 278-294).Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Upadhyay, P., & Punekar, R. M. (2023). A framework for designing frugal innovations in marginalised contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410(3), Article 137170.
- Von Janda, S., Kuester, S., Schuhmacher, M. C., & Shainesh, G. (2020). What frugal products are and why they matter: A cross-national multi-method study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, Article 118977.
- Wang, S., Gao, M., & Zhang, H. (2024). Strengthening SMEs competitiveness and performance via industrial internet: Technological, organizational, and environmental pathways. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1366.
- Weyrauch, T., & Herstatt, C. (2017). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2(1).
- Yanti, V., Amanah, S., Muldjono, P., & Asngari, P. (2018). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberlanjutan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah di Bandung dan Bogor [Factors Influencing the Sustainability of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Bandung and Bogor]. Jurnal Pengkajian Dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian, 20(2), 137-148. (In Indonesian).
- Zainal, M. (2024). The Enabling Role of IT Solutions in SMEs Frugal Innovation- Post Coronavirus Crisis in Bahrain. Advance.
- Zeschky, M. B., Winterhalter, S., & Gassmann, O. (2014). From cost to frugal and reverse innovation: Mapping the field and implications for global competitiveness. Research Technology Management, 57(4), 20-27.
- Zhang, Z., Liu, H., & Zhao, Y. (2024). How enterprises achieve frugal innovation: A configurational study based on the model of organizational symbiosis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(11).


