The effect of entrepreneurial leadership and employer branding on performance through engagement: Moderating effect of organizational trust
-
Received January 31, 2026;Accepted June 4, 2026;Published July 8, 2026
-
Author(s)Diana Sulianti K. TobingLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4140-9251
,
Ferry Tema AtmajaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8735-4957
,
Markus AprionoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4714-0199
,
SudarsihLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8610-9944
,
Nyoman Gede KrishnabudiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8613-6373
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.01
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #3, pp. 1-14
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 10 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Understanding factors that drive employee performance in SMEs is crucial, as human resources are central to success. This study was conducted among batik-producing SMEs in East Java Province, Indonesia, a cultural heritage sector of labor-intensive, skills-based businesses that rely on employees to maintain production quality, sales service, and sustainability. Although entrepreneurial leadership and employer branding are recognized as drivers of employee outcomes, prior studies have examined them separately in large organizations, limiting understanding of their combined effects in SMEs. This study aims to examine the effects of entrepreneurial leadership and employer branding on employee performance, with employee engagement as a mediator and organizational trust as a moderator. Data were collected from 357 employees of batik-producing SMEs in East Java Province, Indonesia, between October and December 2025. Respondents were selected through purposive sampling, targeting production, sales, and administrative staff, as these groups contextually represent core operations. Data were analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results show that entrepreneurial leadership (β = 0.222, p < 0.001) and employer branding (β = 0.476, p < 0.001) positively influence employee performance. Both variables exhibit significant indirect effects through employee engagement (β = 0.074, p < 0.01; β = 0.045, p < 0.01). Organizational trust strengthens the entrepreneurial leadership–employee engagement relationship (β = 0.135, p < 0.01) but weakens the employer branding–employee engagement relationship (β = −0.165, p < 0.01). These findings clarify how entrepreneurial leadership and employer branding shape employee performance in batik SMEs under uncertain environments.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L26, M12, M54, C83
-
References52
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Measurement and structural model
- Figure 2. Moderating effect of organizational trust
-
- Table 1. Respondent demographic characteristics
- Table 2. Assessment of the measurement model
- Table 3. Discriminant validity findings
- Table 4. Structural model assessment
- Table 5. Hypothesis testing
- Table A1. Questionnaire items
-
- Akintola, B. M., Kumar, A., Chokshi, H., Samadhiya, A., & Agrawal, R. (2023). Recover together, recover stronger: An exploratory literature review on the recovery challenges of creative SMEs following the COVID-19 pandemic and proposed future recommendations. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 7(1), 1-22.
- Almeida, L., & Moreira, A. (2022). Workplace innovation: A search for its determinans through a systematic literature review. Business: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 502-524.
- Al-Romeedy, B. S., El-Bardan, M. F., & Badwy, H. E. (2025). How is employee performance affected by employer branding in tourism businesses? Mediation analysis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 8(2), 790-809.
- Aman, A., Rafiq, M., & Dastane, O. (2023). A cross-cultural comparison of work engagement in the relationships between trust climate, job performance, and turnover intention: Focusing on China and Pakistan. Heliyon, 9, Article e19534.
- Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185-206.
- Aparisi-Torrijo, S., Ribes-Giner, G., & Chaves-Vargas, J.-C. (2022). How leadership factors impact different entrepreneurship phases: An analysis with PLS-SEM. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 24(1), 136-154.
- Basit, A. A. (2017). Trust in supervisor and job engagement: Mediating effects of psychological safety and felt obligation. The Journal of Psychology, 151(8), 701-721.
- Biswas, M. K., & Suar, D. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of employer branding. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 57-72.
- Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2019). Multivariate data analysis: Its approach, evolution, and impact. In B.J. Babin & M. Sarstedt (Eds.), The Great Facilitator (pp. 121-130). Cham: Springer.
- Brown, S., Gray, D., McHardy, J., & Taylor, K. (2015). Employee trust and workplace performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 361-378.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression & structural equation models (pp. 71-72). Statistical Publishing Associates.
- Gerdel, S., Vercillo, M., Duffy, R. D., & Vianello, M. (2026). The moderating role of trust on the relation between a leader’s calling and an employee’s calling. Career Development International, 31(8), 105-122.
- Ghlichlee, B., & Larijani, M. M. (2024). Servant leadership and knowledge employee performance: The mediating role of employee innovative behavior in knowledge-based firms. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(3), 544-558.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hallo, L., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Holistic view of intuition and analysis in leadership decision-making and problem-solving. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 1-25.
- Haryanto, B., Suprapti, A. R., Taufik, A., & Maminirina Fenitra, R. (2022). Moderating role of transformational leadership in the relationship between work conflict and employee performance. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article 2105578.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
- Hoang, G., Luu, T. T., & Babalola, M. T. (2025). Entrepreneurial leadership: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 46(2), 285-313.
- Hooi, L. W., & Chan, A. J. (2023). Does workplace digitalization matter in linking transformational leadership and innovative culture to employee engagement? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 3(2), 197-216.
- Huseynova, A., Matošková, J., & Gregar, A. (2022). Linking employer branding and firm-level performance: The case of Azerbaijani firms registered on Glassdoor. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 128-142.
- Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., & Griese, K. M. (2023). Success factors of organizational resilience: A qualitative investigation of four types of sustainable digital entrepreneurs. Management Decision, 61(5), 1244-1273.
- Jena, L. K., Pradhan, S., & Panigrahy, N. P. (2018). Pursuit of organizational trust: Role of employee engagement, psychological well-being and transformational leadership. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 227-234.
- Johnsen, Å. (2026). Do leadership practices impact trust-based management and organizational outcomes? Evidence from a trust reform in a Scandinavian city. International Journal of Public Leadership, 22(2), 170-187.
- Ju, B., Lee, Y., Park, S., & Yoon, S. W. (2021). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between learning organization and organizational performance and employee attitudes: Using the dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire. Human Resource Development Review, 20(1), 43-77.
- Jufrizen, Hasibuan, J. S., Farisi S., & Muslih. (2025). Determinants of employee engagement and organizational citizenship behavior of nurses in public hospitals in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(1), 584-596.
- Karhapää, S. J., Savolainen, T., & Malkamäki, K. (2022). Trust and performance: A contextual study of management change in private and public organisations. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(6), 35-51.
- Kashyap, V., & Verma, N. (2018). Linking dimensions of employer branding and turnover intentions. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(2), 282-295.
- Kim, M. S., & Koo, D.-W. (2017). Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job performance in hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 3044-3062.
- Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet, H. C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866.
- Kucherov, D. G., Alkanova, O. N., Lisovskaia, A. Yu., & Tsybova, V. S. (2022). Employer branding orientation: Effects on recruitment performance under COVID-19. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(10), 2107-2135.
- Lang, L. D., Behl, A., Phuong, N. N. D., Gaur, J., & Dzung, N. T. (2023). Toward SME digital transformation in the supply chain context: The role of structural social and human capital. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 53(4), 448-466.
- Malibari, M. M., & Bajaba, S. (2022). Entrepreneurial leadership and employees’ innovative behavior: A sequential mediation analysis of innovation climate and employees’ intellectual agility. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), Article 100255.
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
- Nanjundeswaraswamy, T. S., Bharath, S., & Nagesh, P. (2022). Employer branding: Design and development of a scale. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 41(1), 88-113.
- Näppä, A. (2023). Co-created employer brands: The interplay of strategy and identity. European Journal of Training and Development, 47(10), 37-52.
- Nienaber, A. M. I., Holtgrave, M., Biron, M., Baumeister, V. M., Nayir, D. Z., & Schewe, G. (2022). Trickle-down effect of organizational trust on co-worker trust: The moderating role of cultural dissimilarity and relationship length. European Management Review, 20, 97-112.
- Papalexandris, N., & Galanaki, E. (2009). Leadership’s impact on employee engagement: Differences among entrepreneurs and professional CEOs. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(4), 365-385.
- Pazetto, C. F., Luiz, T. T., & Beuren, I. M. (2024). Empowering leadership for contextual performance: Serial mediation of organizational support and commitment. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(4), 1005-1026.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54-74.
- Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 6(1), 19-38,
- Sanny, L., Angelina, V., & Christian, B. B. (2021). Innovation of SME service industry in Indonesia in improving customer satisfaction. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 351-370.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Roma, V. G., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
- Seger, K., Englund, H., & Härström, M. (2023). Researchers’ hate-love relationship to performance measurement systems in academia – A Foucauldian perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 20(1), 38-71.
- Srinivas, V., Prasad, K. D. V., Rani, R., & Nisa, M. (2025). Effect of employer branding on employee performance: Mediating and moderating effects of brand perception and employer image. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, Article 101560.
- Susanty, A., Puspitasari, N. B., & Fachreza, A. (2023). Measuring the performance of SMEs during the pandemic situation using system dynamic. Kybernetes, 52(7), 2538-2567.
- Tanwar, K., & Prasad, A. (2016). The effect of employer brand dimensions on job satisfaction: Gender as a moderator. Management Decision, 54(4), 854-886.
- Teece, D. J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management and Organization, 24(3), 359-368.
- Tobing, D. S. K., Apriono, M., Sudarsih, Krishnabudi, N. G., & Ulfa, K. A. (2023). The effect of quality of HR, transformational leadership and compensation on employee performance. Quality Access to Success, 25(201), 31-39.
- Vokić, N. P., Bilušić, M. R., & Najjar, D. (2020). Building organizational trust through internal communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 26(1), 70-83.
- Zheng, Z., & Ahmed, R.I. (2024). Humble leadership and employee creative performance in China: The roles of boundary spanning behavior and traditionality. Personnel Review, 53(1), 193-210.
-
-
Conceptualization
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing, Ferry Tema Atmaja
-
Data curation
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing, Ferry Tema Atmaja, Markus Apriono
-
Formal Analysis
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing, Ferry Tema Atmaja
-
Methodology
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing
-
Resources
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing, Ferry Tema Atmaja, Markus Apriono, Sudarsih
-
Supervision
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing, Ferry Tema Atmaja, Markus Apriono
-
Validation
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing, Ferry Tema Atmaja
-
Writing – original draft
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing
-
Writing – review & editing
Diana Sulianti K. Tobing, Ferry Tema Atmaja, Markus Apriono, Sudarsih, Nyoman Gede Krishnabudi
-
Investigation
Markus Apriono, Sudarsih, Nyoman Gede Krishnabudi
-
Visualization
Markus Apriono, Nyoman Gede Krishnabudi
-
Project administration
Sudarsih, Nyoman Gede Krishnabudi
-
Conceptualization
-
An assessment of informal SMEs’ potential in an African economy – theoretical and conceptual framework
Herrison Matsongoni , Emmanuel Mutambara doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.07(2).2018.01Public and Municipal Finance Volume 7, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 6066 Downloads: 1113 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯInformal Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) play a key role in their respective economies over the world particularly in the African continent. This paper reviews various theories on SMEs towards understanding the potential of the informal sector in the context of African countries. The paper uses a theoretical approach for the purpose of assessing the challenges that have affected the development of the informal SMEs sector over the years in both the developing and developed world. Economically developing countries in Africa pose unique challenges to informal SMEs development compared to the developed countries. The paper reviews the theories that define the rise to informality in Africa by identifying the key determinants for the emergence of informal SMEs. A conceptual framework for assessing informal SME’s potential for Africa is developed. The conceptual framework is based on the Fishbone diagram developed by Kaoru Ishikawa (1986). This paper discusses the intricacies of the applicability of the proposed conceptual framework to assess the potential of the informal SMEs in Africa and the way forward for the formalization debate.
-
The influence of digital transformation on the growth of small and medium enterprises in South Africa
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 20, 2022 Issue #3 pp. 297-309 Views: 5469 Downloads: 2112 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯFrom a global perspective, the business environment has become highly dynamic, unpredictable, and competitive due to external forces – mostly technology – that generate change. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of digital technologies on South African business sectors. The sample includes small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the KwaZulu-Natal province. Being qualitative by design, the study used semi-structured interviews for data collection, with eight interviews in the Durban area. SME managers were purposefully selected as participants based on their management positions in the business/company and that they oversee the business operation and understand the influence of digital transformation in the business. The interviews were then transcribed after data collection to determine any recurring themes. In the effectiveness of digital transformation, the study identified themes such as “gaining exposure” and “gaining effective sales figures” as a result of implementing digital transformation, which was indicated by six of eight participants. The findings showed that digital transformation significantly affects building customer relationships and ensuring easy accessibility of the business. The results further indicate online selling and digital marketing as the leading digital platforms successfully implemented by most South African SMEs. Lastly, the study revealed digital maintenance and rapid changes in technology as challenging factors. Moreover, the study recommends that South African SMEs implement more available digital technologies to gain additional exposure.
-
Artificial intelligence for employee engagement and productivity
Mia Ayu Gusti
,
Alpon Satrianto
,
Candrianto
,
Egy Juniardi
,
Halkadri Fitra
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.14
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 22, 2024 Issue #3 pp. 174-184 Views: 5213 Downloads: 1038 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe “new normal” era has made remote work the new standard, making the use of artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly important. Therefore, this study aims to investigate employee perceptions of change leadership in the application of AI that affects employee engagement and productivity according to the resource-based view (RBV). Of the 467 respondents who worked in the banking industry in West Sumatra province, Indonesia, only 359 met the eligibility requirements. The partial least squares (PLS) analysis shows a direct relationship between AI and employee engagement (p < 0.05) and productivity (p < 0.05), as well as employee engagement and employee productivity (p < 0.05). The effect of AI on employee productivity is mediated by employee engagement (p < 0.05), but the moderating effect provided by change leadership is not significant (p > 0.05) in increasing employee productivity. These findings will help managers create a positive work environment through the application of AI, resulting in higher employee engagement and productivity. Specifically, these findings help organizations integrate AI more effectively and provide managers with a comprehensive understanding of the considerations needed to increase productivity through employee engagement for organizational competitiveness.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Universitas Negeri Padang for helping finish this article. We also appreciate the cooperation and support of each member.

