Do ESG and ownership structures matter for financial restatements? The moderating role of board independence
-
Received February 27, 2026;Accepted August 7, 2026;Published August 18, 2026
-
Author(s)Erma SetiawatiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7164-5779
,
Eskasari PutriLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-8996
,
Shinta Permata SariLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6656-2515
,
Lulu HardinaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8690-2758
,
Nurlita Arum S.Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4236-6072
,
Pa ModouLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5888-5019
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(3).2026.20
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #3, pp. 279–290
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 6 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Financial restatements remain a significant concern because they reflect weaknesses in financial reporting quality, corporate transparency, and governance effectiveness, particularly in emerging markets. This study examines the effects of the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions and ownership structures on the likelihood of financial restatements, as well as the moderating role of board independence. The study employs logistic regression and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) using 609 firm-year observations of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2017–2023. The findings indicate that none of the ESG dimensions, ownership structures, or their interaction with board independence show a statistically significant association with financial restatements at the 5% level, and the model’s explanatory power is limited (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.057). While these results should be interpreted with caution given the model’s limited explanatory capacity, they are consistent with the view that formal ESG and governance mechanisms may not yet operate as effective monitoring instruments in this emerging-market setting. The findings underscore the need for further research and stronger regulatory enforcement to strengthen the substantive role of governance in corporate reporting integrity. These findings have important implications for regulators, corporate boards, and investors in emerging markets, suggesting that voluntary ESG commitments and concentrated ownership structures alone are insufficient safeguards against reporting irregularities unless accompanied by credible enforcement and independent oversight mechanisms.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, G34, M41
-
References45
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sample selection procedure
- Table 2. Variable definitions and measurements
- Table 3. Regression analysis results
-
- Abbas, J., Bresciani, S., Subhani, G., & De Bernardi, P. (2025). Nexus of ambidexterity and frugal innovation for enhanced ESG performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of organizational capabilities. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1), 47.
- Abdi, Y., Li, X., & Càmara-Turull, X. (2022). Exploring the impact of sustainability (ESG) disclosure on firm value and financial performance (FP) in airline industry: the moderating role of size and age. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(4), 5052-5079.
- Ahn, Y. B., & Park, H. C. (2023). Sustainability management through corporate social responsibility activities in the life insurance industry: Lessons from the success story of Kyobo Life Insurance in Korea. Sustainability, 15(15), 11632.
- Al-Asmakh, S., Elamer, A. A., & Uadiale, O. (2026). Power and disclosure: The influence of ownership and governance on GCC audit reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 41(5), 869-896.
- Al-Htaybat, K., & von Alberti-Alhtaybat, L. (2018). Integrated thinking leading to integrated reporting: Case study insights from a global player. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1435-1460.
- Almubarak, W. I., Chebbi, K., & Ammer, M. A. (2023). Unveiling the connection among ESG, earnings management, and financial distress: Insights from an emerging market. Sustainability, 15(16), 12348.
- Apristiana, A. A., & Utomo, D. C. (2025). Corporate governance and fraud: A systematic review. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 703-725.
- Assadi, O., Chouaibi, J., & Marzouki, A. (2025). The effect of ESG reporting on the likelihood of accounting restatements: the moderating role of national culture. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1-34.
- Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465.
- Benlemlih, M., Jaballah, J., & Kermiche, L. (2023). Does financing strategy accelerate corporate energy transition? Evidence from green bonds. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 878-889.
- Dwianto, A., Setiawati, E., Puspitasari, D., & Arum S, N. (2024). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting [The influence of fraud diamonds on fraudulent financial reporting]. Keunis, 12(1), 1-20. (In Indonesian).
- Ebaid, I. E.-S. (2023). Board characteristics and the likelihood of financial statements fraud: empirical evidence from an emerging market. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 47.
- Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
- Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
- Fatchan, L. R., Trisnawati, R., & Setiawati, E. (2025). Good Corporate Governance Modeling on Opportunistic Behavior-Related Party Transaction. Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 10(1), 107-119.
- Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.
- García-Sánchez, I.-M., Hussain, N., Khan, S.-A., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2022). Assurance of corporate social responsibility reports: Examining the role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 89-106.
- Grau, A., Castelo-Branco, M., & Bel-Oms, I. (2025). The impacts of ESG reporting, stakeholder engagement and board gender diversity on firm performance: Exploring the moderating role of board independence. Business Strategy & Development, 8(3), e70159.
- Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Agustia, D., Putra, F. K. G., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2022). Investment efficiency and environmental, social, and governance reporting: Perspective from corporate integration management. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1186-1202.
- Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., & Sonwaney, V. (2024). Environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure motives for environmentally sensitive industry: an emerging economy perspective. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2322027.
- Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. (2015). Greenwash vs. Brownwash: Exaggeration and Undue Modesty in Corporate Sustainability Disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705-723.
- Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50-58.
- Krismiaji, Handayani, & Sumayyah. (2023). Audit quality, board governance and real earnings management - Indonesian evidence. CECCAR Business Review, 4(8), 64-73.
- Li, D., Ma, C., Yang, J., & Li, H. (2024). ESG performance and corporate fraud. Finance Research Letters, 62(PB), 105212.
- Martins, H. C. (2022). Competition and ESG practices in emerging markets: Evidence from a difference-in-differences model. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102371.
- Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
- Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59-78.
- Mwenda, B., & Magwana, I. N. (2023). Nexus Between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Profitability of Firms Listed at Dar Es Salaam Stock Exchange. Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing, 24(2), 122-132.
- Nguyen, N. T. T., & Lee, H.-C. (2024). Unveiling the impacts of corporate environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Sustainability, 16(6), 2459.
- Nugroho, N. A., & Hersugondo, H. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Disclosure Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan [Analysis of the Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Disclosure on Company Financial Performance]. E-Bisnis: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 15(2), 233-243. (In Indonesian).
- OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023. OECD Publishing.
- Rahman, A. F., Kurniawati, D. T., Dewi, A. A., & Kholilah, K. (2023). The value relevance of sustainability disclosure quality. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 8(2), 379-398.
- Sastroredjo, P. E., & Suganda, T. R. (2025). ESG and financial distress: The role of bribery, corruption, and fraud in FTSE All-Share companies. Risks, 13(3), 41.
- Setiawati, E., Putri, E., & Nisa, N. (2022). Implementation of corporate governance, family ownership, and family-aligned board: Evidence from Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 14.
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
- Su, F., Guan, M., Liu, Y., & Liu, J. (2024). ESG performance and corporate fraudulence: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 93, 103180.
- Trisnawati, R., Wardati, S. D., & Putri, E. (2022). The influence of majority ownership, profitability, size of the board of directors, and frequency of board of commissioners meetings on sustainability report disclosure. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 7(1), 94-104.
- Wardhana, R. W., & Achyani, F. (2025). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr), Persistensi Laba, Timeliness, dan Risiko Sistematik terhadap Earnings Response Coeffisient (erc): Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia [The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Earnings Persistence, Timeliness, and Systematic Risk on Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC): An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Companies in the Consumer Goods Sector Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange]. Jurnal Bina Bangsa Ekonomika, 18(1), 84-97. (In Indonesian).
- Widiantari, K. S., Utami, K. M., & Suidarma, I. M. (2024). Kinerja Keuangan dan Return Saham Memediasi Good Corporate Governance terhadap Nilai Perusahaan [Financial Performance and Stock Returns Mediate Good Corporate Governance on Firm Value]. Jurnal Proaksi, 11(1), 63-79. (In Indonesian).
- Wulandari, R., & Maulana, A. (2024). Institutional ownership as a moderating variable of fraud triangle on fraudulent financial statement. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 14(2), 207-222.
- Yasser, Q. R., Mamun, A. A., & Hook, M. (2017). The impact of ownership structure on financial reporting quality in the east. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(2), 178-197.
- Zhao, Y., & Li, X. (2025). ESG rating uncertainty and corporate financial misconduct: The moderating effect of board oversight. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115092.
-
-
Conceptualization
Erma Setiawati, Eskasari Putri
-
Data curation
Erma Setiawati, Eskasari Putri
-
Funding acquisition
Erma Setiawati
-
Methodology
Erma Setiawati, Eskasari Putri, Lulu Hardina
-
Project administration
Erma Setiawati, Eskasari Putri
-
Software
Erma Setiawati, Lulu Hardina, Pa Modou
-
Writing – original draft
Erma Setiawati, Shinta Permata Sari, Lulu Hardina
-
Investigation
Eskasari Putri, Nurlita Arum S.
-
Writing – review & editing
Eskasari Putri, Lulu Hardina, Nurlita Arum S., Pa Modou
-
Resources
Shinta Permata Sari, Lulu Hardina, Nurlita Arum S.
-
Supervision
Shinta Permata Sari, Pa Modou
-
Validation
Shinta Permata Sari, Nurlita Arum S.
-
Visualization
Shinta Permata Sari
-
Formal Analysis
Nurlita Arum S., Pa Modou
-
Conceptualization
-
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 208-220 Views: 11710 Downloads: 3291 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.
Acknowledgment
ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International. -
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana
,
Gede Suparna
,
I Gusti Made Suwandana
,
Sebastian Kot
,
Ismi Rajiani
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 7455 Downloads: 1566 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
-
Influencer marketing’s impact on credibility and purchase intention: A study on University of Bisha students in Saudi Arabia
Mudathir Saad
,
Abdelrehim Awad
,
Adel Fathy Aziz
,
Talaat Rashad Shma
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.21(1).2025.26
Innovative Marketing Volume 21, 2025 Issue #1 pp. 326-337 Views: 7411 Downloads: 2361 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study holds significance due to the increasing impact of influencer marketing on consumer behavior, particularly among the youth demographic in Saudi Arabia. This study aims to examine how influencer marketing influences perceived credibility and purchase intention, emphasizing the roles of transparency and cultural factors in shaping consumer behavior.
A descriptive-analytical method was utilized, the research was conducted at University of Bisha, incorporating a structured survey to gather data from 384 university students, both male and female. The sample was meticulously chosen to embody the characteristics of young consumers, a group recognized for its significant involvement with social media channels and vulnerability to influencer marketing tactics. The findings indicate that the traits of influencers play a crucial role in boosting purchase intention (β = 0.42, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the influence of brand credibility on purchase intention is significant (β = 0.51, p < 0.001), and it serves as a partial mediator in the connection between influencer characteristics and purchase intention (indirect effect = 0.27, p < 0.001). The results underscore Snapchat’s prominence as the leading platform among participants, illustrating its significance for focused influencer marketing initiatives. Marketers are advised to prioritize transparent and authentic collaborations with influencers to strengthen brand credibility and foster consumer trust. Emphasizing partnerships with influencers whose values align with students’ interests on Snapchat will enhance engagement and drive purchasing behavior. This information provides actionable direction for marketers aiming to enhance their influencer marketing approaches, cultivating enduring consumer confidence and sustainable brand development among younger demographics.

