Who really drives the claim? Third-party funding and the future of investment arbitration
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(3).2026.21
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #3, pp. 291–301
- 7 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The article highlights that third-party funding is a major issue in investment-State dispute resolution because it can fund worthwhile claims but also empowers a private party without legal status over proceedings. It presents an analytical model to manage third-party funding within investment-State arbitration by examining funding through the question of control: who drives the claim. Building upon doctrinal insights from existing literature, institutional materials, and case studies, this study aims to reinterpret funding through the lens of influence. The evidence suggests that control over proceedings does not inherently spring from the availability of third-party funds, but from material influence exercised over five critical arbitration stages: case selection, legal budget, settlement, tribunal constitution, and enforcement of arbitral awards. Thus, the article develops a six-part model incorporating five aspects of third-party control. The procedural points are mandatory disclosures at the initial arbitration stage and triggered disclosure of funding-related contract clauses. It proposes requiring proof of financial resources and segregating funded assets, while rebuttably presuming security for legal expenses if any discovered cost award would outweigh claimant finances. It also advocates formal protection for the client to direct claim management and settlement decisions, mandating similar disclosure for funded respondent actions. Supporting arguments identify three situations justifying the security for costs presumption and two instances where funding disclosures should be implemented. The study concludes that investment-State arbitration becomes genuinely equitable only when attention shifts from formal party status to third-party procedural influence.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)K41, K33, F21, G23
-
References27
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Alhasan, T. K. (2025). Arbitration in the era of trade wars: Balancing sovereignty and global commerce. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, Article 101945.
- Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Ciarb). (2025a, May 7). Call for Comment: Proposed Guideline on Third-Party Funding.
- Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Ciarb). (2025b, September 11). Guideline on Third-Party Funding.
- Davitti, D., & Vargiu, P. (2023). Litigation finance and the assetization of international investment arbitration. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 24(3), 487-500.
- Dingwall, J., & Haeri, H. (2010). ATA Construction Industrial and Trading Co v Jordan: ICSID tribunal finds Jordan in violation of its investment treaty obligations (Case comment). International Arbitration Law Review, 13(4), N33-N35.
- Hendel, C. J. (2010). Third party funding. Spain Arbitration Review/Revista del Club Español del Arbitraje, 9, 67-82.
- Honlet, J.-C. (2016). Erratum: Recent decisions on third-party funding in investment arbitration. ICSID Review, 31(1), 254.
- International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). (May 18, 2010). ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/2, Award.
- International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). (2022). ICSID Arbitration Rules.
- International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA) & Queen Mary University of London. (2018). Report of the ICCA-Queen Mary Task Force on Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration (ICCA Reports No. 4). ICCA.
- Kadarisman, A. (2019). Disclosure of third-party funding arrangements and the existence of third-party funders in international investment arbitration. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 17(1), 91-112.
- Kandavel, K., & Srinivas, N. J. (2020). Third party funding in arbitration: An overview. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 3(6), 1138-1147.
- Kaneko, H., & Inoue, S. (2024). Obstacles for Japanese investors in international arbitration (kokusai chūsai) to resolve commercial disputes. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 33(3), 75-97.
- Molot, J. T. (2010). Litigation finance: A market solution to a procedural problem. Georgetown Law Journal, 99, 65-115.
- Monteiro, A. S. C., & Ferreira, D. B. (2019). Third-party funding na arbitragem contra Estados: A relativização da imunidade executória na execução da sentença arbitral contra Estados [Third-party funding of the Estados arbitration: relative of the executive director of the Estados arbitration]. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1(1), 203-234. (In Arabic).
- Ong, T. C., Abdullah, N., & Wen, J. D. T. (2023). Behind the scenes of controversial international commercial arbitration: Case study of heirs to the Sultanate of Sulu v. Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 20(3), 379-404.
- Pair, L. M. (2002). Cross-cultural arbitration: Do the differences between cultures still influence international commercial arbitration despite harmonization? ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 9(1), 57-73.
- Park, W. W., & Rogers, C. A. (2014). Third-party funding in international arbitration: The ICCA Queen-Mary Task Force (Penn State Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 42-2014). SSRN.
- Qtiashat, K. S., & Qtaishat, A. K. (2021). Third party funding in arbitration: Questions and justifications. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 34(2), 341-356.
- Raffa, M. (2015). Arbitration and Sharia- Islamic Sharia'a, what does it have to do with Arbitration? Raffa & Ebeid Lawyers LLP.
- Sahani, V. S. (2021). Global laboratories of third-party funding regulation. AJIL Unbound, 115, 34-39.
- Serbest, F. (2013). Fast-track arbitration – Should it be encouraged in international commercial disputes? In C. Yenidünya, M. Erkan, & R. Asat (Eds.), Reopening the Silk Road in the legal dialogue between Turkey and China (pp. 309-336). Adalet Yayınevi.
- Shao, X. (2021). Disrupt the gambler’s Nirvana: Security for costs in investment arbitration supported by third-party funding. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 12(3), 427-447.
- Steinitz, M. (2011). Whose claim is this anyway? Third-party litigation funding. Minnesota Law Review, 95(4), 1268-1336.
- van Boom, W. H. (Ed.). (2016). Litigation, costs, funding and behaviour: Implications for the law. Routledge.
- Wang, A. (2021). Transplanting public policy: From arbitration to mediation. International Arbitration Law Review, 24(1), 1-27.
- Welser, I., & Klausegger, C. (2009). The Arbitrator and the Arbitration Procedure – Fast track arbitration: Just fast or something different? In C. Klausegger, P. Klein, F. Kremslehner, A. Petsche, N. Pitkowitz, I. Welser, & G. Zeiler (Eds.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (pp. 259-286).


