Accentuating criminal sanctions for environmental degradation: issues and perspectives
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(2).2017.03
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2017, Issue #2, pp. 28-37
- Cited by
- 1135 Views
-
588 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This article examines the need to enforce criminal sanctions for environmental crimes being perpetrated daily, particularly by those who engage in mining and extractive ventures. In South Africa, more often than not, the sanctions for environmental crimes are usually premised on civil suits or administrative actions against the perpetrators. However, these sanctions have not been effective in dissuading perpetrators from environmental harm and degradation because they have the financial means to settle any claims or fines imposed by the courts or the administrative tribunals. It is against the backdrop of this culture of deliberate impunity that this article accentuates the need to strengthen sanctions against perpetrators by imposing criminal sanctions in order to serve as deterrent. A precedent was set by the court in the case of Blue Platinum Ventures (Pty) Limited and Maponya, where the court emphatically invoked and applied criminal sanction against the defendant and was held criminally liable for degrading the environment. The case is a landmark, as it sets a new precedent, where the perpetrator was criminally sanctioned. Countries like United States of America and Australia have been successful in criminal sanctioning of environmental crimes; many mining and extractives companies’ executives and managers have been criminally sanctioned and sent to jail. This article looks at the jurisprudence from these jurisdictions and draws useful lessons that could be used to strengthen prosecution and conviction of perpetrators in South Africa.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)N57, K14, O13
-
References48
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Allan, R. H. (1987). Criminal Sanctions under Federal and State Environmental Statutes.
- Anthony, O. G. (2006). Criminalization of seafarers for accidental discharge of oil: Is there justification in international law for criminal sanction for negligent or accidental pollution of the sea.
- Aufhauser, D. (1990). Environmental Crimes, 1990 Annual Report, 1990 A.B.A. Statistics reported are from 1990.
- Bellamy, J. M. (2002). Putting The Boss Behind Bars: Using Criminal Sanctions Against Executives Who Pollute-What China Could Learn From The United States.
- Blomquist, R. F. (2011). The Logic and Limits of Environmental Criminal Law in the Global Setting: Brazil and the United States-Comparisons, Contrasts, and Questions in Search of a Robust Theory.
- Bucy, P. H. (1990). Corporate ethos: A standard for imposing corporate criminal liability.
- Cable, S., Benson, M. (1993). Acting locally: Environmental injustice and the emergence of grass-roots environmental organizations.
- Clarke, R. V. (1997). Situational Crime Prevention Successful Case Studies.
- Clifford, M. (1998). Environmental Crime: Enforcement, Policy and Social Responsibility. Gaitherburg USA: Aspen Publishing.
- Coffee, J. C. (1980). Making the Punishment Fit the Corporation: The Problems of Finding an Optimal Corporation Criminal Sanction.
- Crowe, T. D. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts.
- Farrier, D. (1992). In search of real criminal law in Environmental Protection and Legal Change. Ed. T. Bonyhady, The Federation Press, Sydney.
- Godsil, R. D. (1991). Remedying environmental racism.
- Green, P., Ward, T., & McConnachie, K. (2007). Logging and legality: Environmental crime, civil society, and the state.
- Hall, J. (2010). General principles of criminal law.
- Harig, L. A. (1992). Ignorance Is Not Bliss: Responsible Corporate Officers Convicted of Environmental Crimes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
- Hodas, D. R. (1995). Enforcement of Environmental Law in a Triangular Federal System: Can Three Not Be a Crowd When Enforcement Authority Is Shared by the Untied States, and Their citizens.
- Howard, B. C. (1991). Wielding the Big Stick: Deterrence and the Criminal Enforcement of Environmental.
- Iseman, R. H. (1972). The Criminal Responsibility of Corporate Officials for Pollution of the Environment.
- Glazewski, J., Witbooi, E. (2002). Environmental Law.
- Kriebel, D., Tickner, J., Epstein, P., & Lemons, J. (2001). The precautionary principle in environmental science.
- Kurki, L. (2000). Restorative and community justice in the United States.
- Larkin, P. (2014). Funding Favored Sons and Daughters: Nonprosecution Agreements and ‘Extraordinary Restitution’ in Environmental Criminal Cases.
- Lazarus, R. J. (1995). Meeting the Demands of Integration in the Evolution of Environmental Law: Reforming Environmental Criminal Law.
- Lazarus, R. S., & Cohen, J. B. (1997). Environmental stress.
- Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains.
- Lott, L., Karpoff, J. M., Rankine, G. (1999). Environmental Violations, Legal Penalties, and Reputation Costs.
- Maguire, M., Newburn, T. (2003). Criminal investigation and crime control.
- Morgan, S. M. (1991). Perils of the Profession: Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine May Facilitate a Dramatic Increase in Criminal Prosecutions of Environmental Offenders.
- Munro, V. E., Husak, D. (2009). Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law.
- Mustafa, M. & Mahomed, N. S. (2015). The Development Of Environmental Crime And Saction In Malaysia.
- Packer, H. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction.
- Pain, N. (1993). Criminal Law And Environment Protection Overview Of Issues And Themes.
- Rabie, M. A. (1972). Legal remedies for environmental protection.
- Rankin, M., & Finkle, P. (1983). The enforcement of environmental law: taking the environment seriously.
- Sachs, L. K. (1996). Strict Construction of the Rule of Lenity in the Interpretation of Environmental Crimes.
- Samantha, B. (2010). Environmental crime in Australia.
- Scott, C. (2004). Regulation in the age of governance: The rise of the post regulatory state.
- Situ, Y., & Emmons, D. (1999). Environmental crime: The criminal justice system's role in protecting the environment.
- Soltau, F. (1999). The National Environmental Management Act and liability for environmental damage.
- Stein, P. (1992). A possible way forward? The experiences of the Land and Environment Court of NSW in pollution control. Criminology Australia, 3(3), 13-15.
- Stessens, G. (1994). Corporate criminal liability: a comparative perspective.
- Uhlmann, D. M. (2009). Environmental crime comes of age: The evolution of criminal enforcement in the environmental regulatory scheme.
- Voiculescu, A. (2009). Human Rights and the New Corporate Accountability: Learning from Recent Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 419-510.
- Wagner. M. 1999. Corporate criminal liability: National and international responses. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 25(2), 600.
- Weiss, E. B., & Jacobson, E. B. (2000). Engaging countries: strengthening compliance with international environmental accords.
- White, R. (2013). Environmental crime and problem-solving courts. Crime, law and social change, 59(3), 267-278.
- Wolff, R. (2016). Environmental Crimes and Imprisonment: Does Prison Work to Prevent and Punish Environmental Criminals?
