Assessing user preferences and competitive strategies of Gojek and Grab in ASEAN’s ride-hailing market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.21(1).2025.01
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2025, Issue #1, pp. 1-13
- 97 Views
-
52 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Along with the development of current economic patterns, digital platforms provide infrastructure to facilitate interaction between users. One example is a ride-hailing platform that allows interaction between users who may never have met. This study aims to determine the criteria, sub-criteria, and alternatives influencing users in choosing ride-hailing and map Gojek and Grab’s grand strategy to compete in the ASEAN market, especially in Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore. This research uses a questionnaire to collect data, with 377 Gojek and Grab users as participants. The main criteria in each country were obtained using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method with the Expert Choice tool. Safety, price, and usability were the main criteria for choosing a ride-hailing platform in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam. In contrast, in Singapore, privacy emerged as the main criterion when choosing these platforms, in addition to safety. To increase competition in ASEAN, Gojek and Grab should improve customer relationship criteria, as these criteria can add value to the company. This research also shows that Grab dominates the ride-hailing market in Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore because it implemented a horizontal strategy by acquiring Uber. Gojek only excels in its home country, Indonesia, by acquiring and innovating in integrating with the commuter line and launching an Initial Public Offering (IPO). This research found that there is still a need to improve vertical and horizontal strategies and outsourcing to compete effectively in the global market.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)М31, L92
-
References51
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
-
- Table 1. Participant profile of ride-hailing users in Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore
- Table 2. Main hierarchical structure of criteria
- Table A1. The main hierarchical structure of criteria, sub-criteria, and alternatives in choosing ride-hailing in Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore
-
- Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Promises and Paradoxes of the Sharing Economy: An Organizing Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1-10.
- Alemi, F., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P., & Handy, S. (2019). What Drives the Use of Ridehailing in California? Ordered Probit Models of the Usage Frequency of Uber and Lyft. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 102, 233-248.
- Amoo, N., Hiddlestone-Mumford, J., Ruzibuka, J., & Akwei, C. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring strategy implementation: A multidimensional view. Strategic Change, 28(6), 445-467.
- Arumugam, V., Ismail, R. M., & Joeharee, M. (2020). A Review and Conceptual Development of the Factors Influencing Consumer Intention towards E-Hailing Service in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(11).
- ASEAN. (2015). ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025.
- Axsen, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). The Roles of Users in Electric, Shared and Automated Mobility Transitions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 1-21.
- Aydin, S., & Kahraman, C. (2011). A Modified Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process based Multicriteria Decision Making Methodology for Assessing E-commerce Website Quality: A Case Study in Turkey. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering.
- Baumann, M., Weil, M., Peters, J. F., Chibeles-Martins, N., & Moniz, A. B. (2019). A Review of Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches for Evaluating Energy Storage Systems for Grid Applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 516-534.
- Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
- Chakravarthy, B. S., & Lorange, P. (1991). Managing the Strategy Process: A Framework for a Multibusiness Firm. Prentice Hall.
- Choi, T. M., Guo, S., Liu, N., & Shi, X. (2019). Values of Food Leftover Sharing Platforms in the Sharing Economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 23-31.
- Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran [Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches].
- de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The Digital Platform: a Research Agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33, 124-135.
- Eferin, Y., Hohlov, Y., & Rossoto, C. (2019). Digital Platforms in Russia: Competition between National and Foreign Multi-Sided Platforms Stimulates Growth and Innovation. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(2), 129-145.
- Ghram, M., & Frikha, H. M. (2021). ARAS-H: A Ranking-based Decision Aiding Method for Hierarchically Structured Criteria. RAIRO – Operations Research, 55(3), 2035-2054.
- Glueck, W. F., & Jauch, L. R. (1984). Business Policy and Strategic Management. McGraw Hill.
- Gong, D., Liu, S., Liu, J., & Ren, L. (2020). Who Benefits from Online Financing? A Sharing Economy E-tailing Platform Perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 222.
- Görener, A. (2012). Comparing AHP and ANP: An Application of Strategic Decisions Making in a Manufacturing Company. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(11).
- Govindan, K., Shankar, K. M., & Kannan, D. (2020). Achieving Sustainable Development Goals through Identifying and Analyzing Barriers to Industrial Sharing Economy: A Framework Development. International Journal of Production Economics, 227.
- Ha, S., & Kim, S. (2024). Developing a conceptual framework for digital platform literacy. Telecommunications Policy, 48(3).
- Hartono, J. (2018). Metoda Pengumpulan dan Teknik Analisis Data (Data Collection Methods and Analysis Techniques) (1st ed.). ANDI (IKAPI Members).
- Hill, C. W. L., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2015). Strategic Management Theory (11th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
- Kurniawan, P., & Achjari, D. (2024). Dynamic cross-border payment preferences: A qualitative study of Indonesian expatriates in Thailand and Malaysia. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(2), 115-125.
- Kibaroglu, O. (2019). Street Smart Technology: Grab and GoJek. National University of Singapore.
- Lee, J. W., & Lee, S. H. (2019). User Participation and Valuation in Digital Art Platforms: the Case of Saatchi Art. European Journal of Marketing, 53(6).
- Li, J. (2024). Selection of Corporate Strategic and Operational Decisions based on The Strategic Orientation of Informatization: An Experimental Study. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1).
- Ma, H. L., Wong, C. W. H., Leung, L. C., & Chung, S. H. (2020). Facility Sharing in Business-to-business Model: A Real Case Study for Container Terminal Operators in Hong Kong Port. International Journal of Production Economics, 221.
- Mazzei, M. J., & Noble, D. (2017). Big Data Dreams: A Framework for Corporate Strategy. Business Horizons, 60(3), 405-414.
- Ochinanwata, C., Igwe, P. A., & Radicic, D. (2024). The institutional impact on the digital platform ecosystem and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(2/3), 687-708.
- Ossadnik, W., Schinke, S., & Kaspar, R. H. (2016). Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(2), 421-457.
- Parente, R. C., Geleilate, J. M. G., & Rong, K. (2018). The Sharing Economy Globalization Phenomenon: A Research Agenda. Journal of International Management, 24(1), 52-64.
- Park, Y. J., Sang, Y., Taroreh, F., & Muaja (2019). The Ontology of Digital Asset after Death: Policy Complexities, Suggestions and Critique of Digital Platforms. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 22(1), 1-14.
- Prananda, N. I., YinFah, B. C., Chen, L. L., & Chuen, P. W. (2020). Go-Jek Company: Go-Jek’s Rise to Dominating Indonesian’s Markets and Southeast Asean. In TEST Engineering and Management (pp. 735-743).
- Prescott, M. E. (2014). Big Data and Competitive Advantage at Nielsen. Management Decision, 52(3), 573-601.
- Qiao, S., & Yeh, A. G.-O. (2023). Is Ride-hailing Competing or Complementing Public Transport? A Perspective from Affordability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 114.
- Raco, J., Yulius, R., Frankie, T., & Octavianus, M. (2018). Determinant Factors Influencing People to Use Motorcycle Taxi Online Services using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. In Human Development through Spirituality, Peace Economics and Peace Science & Future of Management Education.
- Ramaiah, A. K. (2020). Merger Phenomena in Digital Economy: Uber-Grab Competition Tell-Tale in Malaysia. In The 13th Asian Academy of Management International Conference 2019 (pp. 638-650).
- Rossotto, C. M., Das, P. L., Ramos, E. G., Miranda, E. C., Badran, M. F., Licetti, M. M., & Murciego, G. M. (2018). Digital Platforms: A Literature Review and Policy Implications for Development. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 19(1-2), 93-109.
- Rufandi, R., & Achjari, D. (2019). Penentuan Prioritas Generalized Audit Software (GAS) dengan Pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process: Studi pada Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia (BPK RI) [Prioritization of Generalized Audit Software (GAS) with Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach: A Study at the Supreme Audit Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK RI)]. ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, 8(1).
- Saaty, T. L. (1982). Digital control system analysis and design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 15, 450-452.
- Saaty, T. L. (1995). Transport Planning with Multiple Criteria: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Applications and Progress Review. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 29(I), 81-126.
- Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision Making - The Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(1), 1-35.
- Shah, S. A. H., & Kubota, H. (2022). Passenger’s Satisfaction with Service Quality of App-based Ride Hailing Services in Developing Countries: Case of Lahore, Pakistan. Asian Transport Studies, 8.
- Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The Sharing Economy and Digital Platforms: a Review and Research Agenda. In International Journal of Information Management (Vol. 43, pp. 328-341). Elsevier Ltd.
- Tang, C. M. (2015). How do Students Select Social Networking Sites? An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 8(2), 81-98.
- The World Bank. (2016). Digital Dividends: World Development Report 2016.
- Thornton, H. C. (2024). Business model change and internationalization in the sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 170.
- Tong, T., Dai, H., Xiao, Q., & Yan, N. (2020). Will Dynamic Pricing Outperform? Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence from O2O on-demand Food Service Market. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 375-385.
- Trenz, M., Frey, A., & Veit, D. (2018). Disentangling the Facets of Sharing: A categorization of what we know and don’t know about the Sharing Economy. In Internet Research (Vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 888-925). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
- Vaidhyanathan, K., Caporuscio, M., Florio, S., & Muccini, H. (2024). ML-enabled Service Discovery for Microservice Architecture: a QoS Approach. In SAC ‘24: Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 1193-1200).
- Wang, X., Ng, C. T., & Dong, C. (2019). Implications of Peer-to-peer Product Sharing when the Selling Firm Joins the Sharing Market. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 138-151.