Artificial intelligence in project management: A bibliometric analysis

  • 45 Views
  • 12 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into project management through a bibliometric analysis of scholarly publications and patents from 2001 to 2024. The paper aims to identify key trends, emerging applications, and global contributions to this evolving field. The study analyzes 51,752 patents from Lens, 5.5 million scholarly records from Google Scholar, and 436,380 records from Web of Science, providing a comprehensive overview of AI’s impact on project management. The analysis maps the evolution of AI-driven project management practices, focusing on resource allocation, risk management, and scheduling optimization. The findings reveal a substantial increase in AI-related project management research, with China and the United States leading in research output. A notable surge in publications post-2019 suggests acceleration due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the growing demand for digital transformation in project execution. Despite the rising adoption of AI in project management, research gaps persist, particularly in interdisciplinary methodologies, practical AI applications, and ethical concerns related to algorithmic decision-making. This study contributes to understanding AI’s transformative role in project management and highlights future research directions to enhance AI adoption for improved efficiency, decision-making, and project performance. The findings underscore the need for continued exploration of interdisciplinary approaches, practical implementations, and ethical considerations to foster innovation and efficiency in AI-driven project management.
view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Publication dynamics from 2001 to 2024, based on data from the Web of Science
    • Figure 2. List of institutions by published articles
    • Figure 3. List of areas and categories
    • Figure 4. List of countries by contributions
    • Figure 5. Network visualization map
    • Conceptualization
      Nurkhat Ibadildin, Zhaxat Kenzhin
    • Funding acquisition
      Nurkhat Ibadildin, Rymkul Ismailova
    • Methodology
      Nurkhat Ibadildin, Zhaxat Kenzhin
    • Supervision
      Nurkhat Ibadildin, Assel Nurguzhina
    • Writing – original draft
      Nurkhat Ibadildin, Rymkul Ismailova, Samalgul Nassanbekova
    • Data curation
      Zhaxat Kenzhin, Aiman Kadyrova
    • Formal Analysis
      Zhaxat Kenzhin, Gaukhar Yeshenkulova
    • Writing – review & editing
      Zhaxat Kenzhin, Gaukhar Yeshenkulova, Assel Nurguzhina, Samalgul Nassanbekova, Aiman Kadyrova
    • Project administration
      Gaukhar Yeshenkulova, Aiman Kadyrova
    • Resources
      Gaukhar Yeshenkulova, Rymkul Ismailova
    • Investigation
      Rymkul Ismailova, Aiman Kadyrova
    • Software
      Assel Nurguzhina, Aiman Kadyrova
    • Validation
      Assel Nurguzhina, Samalgul Nassanbekova
    • Visualization
      Assel Nurguzhina, Samalgul Nassanbekova