The relevance of social and environmental commitments for entrepreneurs during wartime: Evidence from GEM Ukraine data
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.26
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #1, pp. 352-363
- 27 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study examines Ukrainian entrepreneurs’ commitment to social and environmental sustainability during the ongoing war and how their actions align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It assesses the impact of economic, social, and infrastructural challenges on sustainability practices during the war, emphasizing the relationship between crisis management and long-term sustainability strategies. The study is based on the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) Adult Population Survey (APS) 2023 in Ukraine. This dataset was collected as part of the GEM Ukraine project and reflects the authors’ contributions and leadership role in the initiative. Importantly, these results were not included in the GEM Global Report or other publications, which emphasizes the originality and importance of this study. A regression model examines the relationship between the Index of War Impact (IWI) and corporate attitudes toward sustainability, focusing on social and environmental contributions, awareness of the SDGs, and the visibility of socially oriented companies. The results show that economic hardships significantly drive entrepreneurs to prioritize sustainability efforts, while awareness of the SDGs plays a central role in decision-making. In contrast, the social and infrastructural impacts of war have no significant influence on contributions to sustainability. Entrepreneurs in economically challenged regions show a stronger alignment with sustainability goals, indicating adaptive strategies under crisis conditions. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to promote resilient and sustainable entrepreneurship in war-affected areas. It contributes to the academic discussion on entrepreneurship, sustainability, and resilience in times of crisis.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L26, M14
-
References35
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variables used for model estimation
- Table 2. Summarized dataset of dependent and independent variables for five regions of Ukraine
- Table 3. Pearson correlations
- Table 4. Impact of war and awareness of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals on the Social and Environmental Contribution Index
-
- Ali, M., Mustapha, I., Osman, S., & Hassan, U. (2021). University social responsibility: A review of conceptual evolution and its thematic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, Article 124931.
- Al-Makura, A. H. M. (2021). The challenges and effects of violent conflict on development: A study of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (Doctoral Dissertation). Baze University.
- Al-Omoush, K. S. (2024). Drivers of digital corporate social responsibility during unprecedented crises: An institutional perspective. Kybernetes, 53(3), 882-900.
- Apalkova, V., Apalkov, S., Meshko, N., & Tarasiuk, O. (2024). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Ukraine 2023/2024. Zenodo.
- Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Singh, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility: Insights from COVID-19 and stakeholder theory. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(6), 154-169.
- Bartlett III, R. P., & Morse, A. (2020). Small business survival capabilities and policy effectiveness: Evidence from Oakland (Working Paper No. w27629). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Beekman, L. U. U. K. (2023). Strategic allocation of resources to increase ambidexterity in large firms: A single case study (Master’s Thesis). University of Twente.
- Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Thakre, S. (2021). Coronavirus pandemic and economic lockdown; Study of strategic initiatives and tactical responses of firms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(5), 1240-1268.
- Bruch, C., Muffett, C., & Nichols, S. (Eds.). (2016). Governance, natural resources and post-conflict peacebuilding (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Brück, T., Habibi, N., Martin-Shields, C., Sneyers, A., Stojetz, W., & Van Weezel, S. (2016). The relationship between food security and violent conflict: Summary of a report to FAO. ISDC-International Security and Development Center.
- Camillus, J. C., Baker, J. E., Daunt, A. I., & Jang, J. (2020). Strategies for transcending the chaos of societal disruptions. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 17(1/2), 5-14.
- Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90-100.
- Fernández-Laviada, A., López-Gutiérrez, C., & San-Martín, P. (2020). The moderating effect of countries’ development on the characterization of the social entrepreneur: An empirical analysis with GEM data. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31, 563-580.
- Haldar, S. (2019). Towards a conceptual understanding of sustainability-driven entrepreneurship. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1157-1170.
- Hepfer, M., & Lawrence, T. B. (2022). The heterogeneity of organizational resilience: Exploring functional, operational and strategic resilience. Organization Theory, 3(1).
- Hil, S., Ionescu-Somers, A., Coduras, A., Guerrero, M., Menipaz, E., Boutaleb, F., Zbierowski, P., Sahasranamam, S., & Shay, J. (2024). GEM 2023/2024 global report: 25 years and growing. Global Entrepreneur Monitor.
- International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2023). Ukraine Internal Displacement Report: General Population Survey.
- Lee, Y., Kim, J., Mah, S., & Karr, A. (2024). Entrepreneurship in times of crisis: A comprehensive review with future directions. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 14(3), 905-950.
- Lim, W. M. (2022). The sustainability pyramid: A hierarchical approach to greater sustainability and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals with implications for marketing theory, practice, and public policy. Australasian Marketing Journal, 30(2), 142-150.
- Ma, Z., Xiao, L., & Yin, J. (2018). Toward a dynamic model of organizational resilience. Nankai Business Review International, 9(3), 246-263.
- Martin-de Castro, G. (2021). Exploring the market side of corporate environmentalism: Reputation, legitimacy and stakeholders’ engagement. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 289-294.
- Miklian, J., & Hoelscher, K. (2022). SMEs and exogenous shocks: A conceptual literature review and forward research agenda. International Small Business Journal, 40(2), 178-204.
- Mills, R., & Fan, Q. (2006). The investment climate in post-conflict situations (Policy Research Working Paper WPS4055). World Bank Publications.
- Moneva-Abadía, J. M., Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Sánchez-Hernández, M. I. (2019). Corporate social responsibility as a strategic opportunity for small firms during economic crises. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(sup2), 172-199.
- Nautiyal, S., & Pathak, P. (2024). A resilient path to prosperity: Understanding the impact of entrepreneurial resilience on SMEs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 14(1), Article 8.
- Nogueira, E., Gomes, S., & Lopes, J. M. (2023). A meta-regression analysis of environmental sustainability practices and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 426, Article 139048.
- Olszewski, L. M. (2022). Organizational slack, temporality, and ambidexterity shaping the innovative behaviors of small and medium-sized enterprises and family firms. University of Wisconsin-Whitewater.
- Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 428-461.
- Rashed, A. H., & Shah, A. (2021). The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 2931-2948.
- Risi, D., Vigneau, L., Bohn, S., & Wickert, C. (2023). Institutional theory-based research on corporate social responsibility: Bringing values back in. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 3-23.
- Roomi, M. A., Saiz-Alvarez, J. M., & Coduras, A. (2021). Measuring sustainable entrepreneurship and eco-innovation: A methodological proposal for the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). Sustainability, 13(7), Article 4056.
- Salunkhe, U., Rajan, B., & Kumar, V. (2023). Understanding firm survival in a global crisis. International Marketing Review, 40(5), 829-868.
- Taghian, M., D’Souza, C., & Polonsky, M. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 340-363.
- Zaharia, R. M., & Zaharia, R. (2021). Triple bottom line. In D. Crowther & S. Seifi (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 75-101). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Zimon, D., Tyan, J., & Sroufe, R. (2020). Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: Practices to alignment with un sustainable development goals. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(1), 219-236.