Assessing the impact of institutional environment quality on the development of e-commerce in developed and developing countries
-
Author(s)Aksaule ZhanbozovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7143-5680
,
Tolkyn AzatbekLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8985-8905
,
Marat MyrzakhmetLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-3608
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.26
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #3, pp. 326-340
- 254 Views
-
42 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study uses the new institutional economic theory and demonstrates how the quality of the institutional environment can be correlated with the development of e-commerce in different countries. The goal is to analyze the impact of international indices that assess the institutional environment on e-commerce penetration in countries with varying levels of economic development. The international indices used include the Networked Readiness Index, the E-Government Development Index, components of the Index of Economic Freedom, and indicators from The Worldwide Governance Indicators, such as control of corruption and rule of law. The level of e-commerce penetration was measured by its share in retail trade. The study analyzed developed countries with high e-commerce penetration, like the USA, the UK, Germany, South Korea, and Singapore, alongside developing countries, such as China, Turkey, Mexico, and Kazakhstan. The relationships between e-commerce penetration and international indices were identified using correlation analysis with the calculation of Spearman’s coefficient, followed by an assessment of the statistical significance of the obtained coefficients. The analysis revealed varying degrees of association between institutional quality and e-commerce penetration. Notably, the E-Government Development Index and the Networked Readiness Index showed positive correlations with e-commerce levels in all studied countries. However, the rule of law, control of corruption, and Investment Freedom indices showed varying correlations, indicating that these relationships are influenced by factors beyond economic development, such as political systems and regulatory approaches.
Acknowledgment
This study has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant IRN AP14871419 “Formation of institutional environment of electronic commerce market in Kazakhstan, its evaluation and development mechanism”).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L81, P52
-
References59
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure A1. The share of e-commerce in retail trade in the studied countries from 2007 to 2022
-
- Table 1. Main components of the e-commerce institutional environment
- Table 2. Endogenous variables
- Table 3. Correlation analysis using the Spearman method
- Table 4. Correlations of time series between the share of e-commerce and international indices and their components of measuring the institutional environment
-
- Adam, I. O., Alhassan, M. D., & Afriyie, Y. (2020). What drives global B2C E-commerce? An analysis of the effect of ICT access, human resource development and regulatory environment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 835-850.
- Al-Omoush, Kh. S., Ancillo, A., & Gavrila, S. G. (2022). The role of cultural values in social commerce adoption in the Arab world: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, Article 121440.
- Aseri, A., & Morris, R. (2013). Cultural impact on e-commerce: A comparative study. Issues in Information Systems, 14(1), 431-440.
- Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (Eds.). (2013). The global information technology report 2013: Growth and jobs in a hyperconnected world. World Economic Forum and INSEAD.
- Blakeley C. J., & Matsuura J. H. (2004). The use of e-government to encourage e-commerce development. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications (pp. 15-16). Damascus, Syria.
- Cho, J., Ozment, J., & Sink, H. (2008). Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e-commerce market. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 336-359.
- Clegg, J. (2019). From the editor: International business policy: What it is, and what it is not. Journal of International Business Policy, 2, 111-118.
- Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Makhija M. (2017). International business responses to institutional voids. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 293-307.
- Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Corruption and the shadow economy: An empirical analysis. Public Choice, 144, 215-238.
- Freund, C. L., & Weinhold, D. (2004). The effect of the Internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 62(1), 171-189.
- Gibbs, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (2004). A cross-country investigation of the determinants of scope of e-commerce use: An institutional approach. Electronic Markets, 14(2), 124-137.
- Gomez-Herrera, M. E., Martens, B., & Turlea G. (2014). The drivers and impediments for cross-border e-commerce in the EU. Information Economics and Policy, 28, 83-96.
- Hawk, S. (2004). Comparison of B2C e-commerce in development countries. Marketing and Trade Electronic Commerce Research, 4(3), 181-199.
- Hendricks, S., & Mwapwele, S. D. (2024). A systematic literature review on the factors influencing e-commerce adoption in developing countries. Data and Information Management, 8(1), Article 100045.
- Hiwarkar, T. (2013). E-commerce infrastructure for the development of technology and communication. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 2(4), 84-94.
- Ho, Ch-S., Kauffman, J. R., & Liang P-T. (2007). A growth theory perspective on B2C e-commerce growth in Europe: An exploratory study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(3), 237-259.
- ITU. (n.d.). DataHub. Households with access to Internet, by type of service.
- Jean, B. R-J., Kim D., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). Antecedents and outcomes of digital platform risk for international new ventures’ internationalization. Journal of World Business, 55(1), Article 101021.
- Jiang, P., Jiang, H., Hu, Y.C., Liang, C., & Wang, S. (2020). Identification of key factors affecting logistics service quality of cross-border e-commerce. Proceedings from: HCI in Business, Government and Organizations: 7th International Conference (pp. 384-396). Denmark.
- Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth without Governance. Economía 3(1), 169-215.
- Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S. J. (1999). Does “grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? (Working Paper 7093). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Kpodar, K. R., & Andrianaivo, M. (2011). ICT, financial inclusion, and growth: Evidence from African countries. IMF Working Papers, 2011(073).
- Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J., Melville, N., & Zhu, K. (Eds.). (2006). Global e-commerce: Impacts of National Environment and Policy. Cambridge University Press.
- Kshetri, N. (2007). Barriers to e-commerce and competitive business models in developing countries: A case study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(4), 443-452.
- Martinez, C. A., & Williams, C. (2010). National institutions, entrepreneurship and global ICT adoption: A cross-country test of competing theories. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 73-91.
- Merhi, M. I., & Ahluwalia, P. (2018). Digital economy and corruption perceptions: A cross-country analysis. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 18, 29-47.
- Molla, A., & Licker P. S. (2005). E-commerce adoption in developing countries: A model and instrument. Information & Management, 42(6), 877-899.
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
- OECD & WTO. (2017). Aid for trade at a glance 2017: Promoting trade, inclusiveness and connectivity for sustainable development. Paris: WTO, Geneva/OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2018). OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Kazakhstan 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2019). Unpacking E-commerce: Business models, trends and policies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Oxley, E. J., & Yeung, B. (2001). E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 705-723.
- Rabayah, K. S., Maree, M., & Alhashmi, S. M. (2022). Cultural factors that influence the adoption of e-commerce: A Palestinian case study. Information Development, 38(4), 623-640.
- Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between +1/−1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17, 139-142.
- Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., Deep Sharma, G., Dańska-Borsiak, B., & Grzelak, M. M. (2024). Innovation-driven e-commerce growth in the EU: An empirical study of the propensity for online purchases and sustainable consumption. Sustainability, 16(4), Article 1563.
- Saha, S., Beladi, H., & Kar, S. (2021). Corruption control, shadow economy and income inequality: Evidence from Asia. Economic Systems, 45(2), Article 100774.
- Scholl, H. J., Barzilai-Nahon, K., Jin-Hyuk, A., Popova, O. H., & Re, B. (2009). E-commerce and e-government: How do they compare? What can they learn from each other? 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Waikoloa, HI, USA.
- Schwab, K. (2019). The global competitiveness report 2019. World Economic Forum.
- Scupola, A. (2003). The adoption of internet commerce by SMEs in the South of Italy: An environmental, technological and organizational perspective. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6(1), 52-71.
- Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1-15.
- Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 72-101.
- Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, Th. S.H. (2011). Development and impact of e-government: The intertwined role of e-commerce from a cross-country stakeholder’s perspective. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 8(2-3), 144-163.
- Statista. (2024, July 18). E-commerce worldwide – statistics & facts.
- Sui, L., Cao, Y., Zhang, L., & Guo, X. (2011). Analysis of the relationship between Chinese e-commerce and e-government. In D. Jin & S. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Computer Science, Intelligent System and Environment. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
- Tamin, M., &Abdul Adis, A-A. (2022). The impact of TOE framework on e-commerce advantage among small medium enterprise (SME’s) digital channel in Malaysia. Journal of Distribution Science, 20(8), 33-46.
- Tehan, R., & Information Research Division. (2003). E-commerce statistics: Explanation and sources. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2015). Information economy report: Unlocking the potential of E-commerce for developing countries.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2019). World investment report 2019: Special economic zones.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2020). World investment report 2020: International production beyond the pandemic.
- United Nations. (UN). (2022). The future of digital government. E-government survey 2022. New York.
- UNCITRAL. (2009). Promoting Confidence in Electronic Commerce: Legal Issues on International Use of Electronic Authentication and Signature Methods.
- Wang, Y., Feng, Q., & Jiang, L. (2023). Broadband infrastructure and local government fiscal risk: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 55(48), 5613-5636.
- World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy.
- Yan, Q., Wu, S., Wang, L., Wu, P., Chen, H., & Wei, G. (2016). E-WOM from e-commerce websites and social media: Which will consumers adopt? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 17, 62-73.
- Zhanbozova, A. B., Azatbek, T. A., Valieva, S. N., Tuzelbaeva, I. N., & Zhumanazarov, K. B. (2021). The e-commerce market in Kazakhstan: Analysis of the state and development directions. Economics: The Strategy and Practice, 16(1), 34-48.
- Zhao, H., Kim, S., Suh, T., & Du, J. (2007). Social institutional explanations of global Internet diffusion: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Global Information Management, 15(2), 28-55.
- Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61-84.
- Zhu, L., & Thatcher, Sh. (2010). National information ecology: A new institutional economics perspective on global e-commerce adoption. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11(1), 53-72.
- Zimu, F. (2023). Exploring the impact of cultural factors on consumer behavior in e-commerce: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery, 2(03), 31-36.
-
Barriers to effective value chain management in developing countries: new insights from the cotton industrial value chain
Arthur Mapanga ,
Collins Ogutu Miruka ,
Nehemiah Mavetera
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 22-35 Views: 2541 Downloads: 849 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯA rigorous and extensive application of the value chain management (VCM) has become the vogue in modern day business practices and processes. However, due to the complex and multidimensional nature of value chains, achieving efficient and effective value chain management in real value chains remains a major conundrum for practitioners. Many unknown barriers continue to impede effective and efficient value chain management in developing countries’ industrial value chains. The purpose of this study was to find out the common barriers to effective value chain management in a developing country’s industrial value chains using evidence from the cotton industry in Zimbabwe. The analysis was based on survey data sets obtained from 157 purposively sampled experts from the cotton industry value chain in Zimbabwe. Exploratory factor analysis was used to find the barriers to effective value chain management. The results revealed both architectural and governance barriers to effective value chain management. The findings also presented major policy implications for industrial value chains in the developing countries and also indicated areas for further robust research founded on a broader data set from other developing countries’ industrial chains as a way of validating the findings of this study.
-
Flash sale and online impulse buying: Mediation effect of emotions
Martaleni Martaleni ,
Ferdian Hendrasto ,
Noor Hidayat ,
Amin Alfandy Dzikri ,
Ni Nyoman Kerti Yasa
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(2).2022.05
Innovative Marketing Volume 18, 2022 Issue #2 pp. 49-59 Views: 1918 Downloads: 1102 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯFlash sale (FS) is a marketing strategy that is widely used and developed in sales through e-commerce. The implementation of the FS strategy is to provide discounts or special propositions on products offered within a certain time limit. Time restrictions aim to encourage consumers’ emotions to make impulse buying (IB). This study examines the effect of consumer emotions as a mediating variable on IB among Shoppee consumers in Indonesia caused by FS activities that are not carried out on certain important days. The required data were collected through the distribution of online questionnaires to respondents who, in the last three months, had made transactions through Shoppee e-commerce platform. A total of 150 questionnaires are analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results of the analysis show that the flash sale strategy carried out by the Shoppee e-commerce platform in Indonesia has a direct effect on increasing consumer emotions. This means that the higher the intensity of the FS promotion, the stronger the influence on consumer emotions. Emotions increase IB. FS has no significant effect on increasing IB. Subsequent findings show that FS indirectly has a positive and significant effect on IB through emotions. In other words, this study proves that the emotions are a mediating variable in online IB. This study is helpful for companies in developing appropriate strategies for their promotions in utilizing consumers’ impulse buying behavior by using strategies that trigger consumers’ emotions.
-
Online impulse buying on TikTok platform: Evidence from Indonesia
Nur Rizqi Febriandika ,
Alfinna Putri Utami ,
Afifah Nur Millatina
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(3).2023.17
Innovative Marketing Volume 19, 2023 Issue #3 pp. 197-210 Views: 1888 Downloads: 609 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯTikTok Shop boosts TikTok’s huge potential as an e-commerce platform that encourages sellers and buyers to increase the number of transactions. The emergence of this feature encourages the online impulse buying phenomenon on the TikTok platform. This study aims to examine the factors that influence online impulse buying on TikTok in Indonesia through the constructs of brand review, sales promotion, customer satisfaction, religiosity, and brand expectation. This quantitative research uses a questionnaire that is distributed randomly online and collected from 312 respondents in Indonesia. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), data analysis was conducted and hypotheses were examined. The results show that customer satisfaction (β: 0.501) and brand review (β: 0.358) play an important role in increasing brand expectation. At the same time, sales promotion (ρ-value > 0.05) has no impact on brand expectation. This study highlights that religiosity (β: –0.239) and brand expectation (β: –0.510) can reduce online impulse buying behavior. Brand expectation (β: –0.510) is the most dominant variable in reducing online impulse buying behavior on TikTok.
