Workforce sustainability and quality of service in accredited hospitals in India: Mediating role of job engagement
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.03
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 25-33
- Cited by
- 500 Views
-
153 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The healthcare industry in India has witnessed remarkable growth and transformation in recent years, with a burgeoning demand for quality healthcare services. The sustainability of the healthcare workforce and the service quality of accredited hospitals are critical factors that significantly influence the overall healthcare system in India. This study aims to investigate the relationship between workforce sustainability, quality of healthcare service, and job engagement within the context of accredited hospitals in India. A descriptive research design is employed, and a structured questionnaire is used to gather primary data from the doctors and nurses as they have more burnout intentions at the workplace. The sample size of the study is 384 respondents: 86.2% are doctors and 13.8% are nurses. The study results reveal that unmarried doctors and nurses exhibit greater sustainability (with a score of 3.7767). Similarly, the millennial workforce demonstrates higher sustainability (scoring 3.8106) than the Gen X cohort (scoring 3.7775). Notably, doctors exhibit greater sustainability in the workplace (scoring 3.7772) when contrasted with nurses (scoring 3.6061). Job engagement varies with the annual income. The female workforce holds more favorable perceptions regarding the quality of healthcare service (scoring 3.8583). The study found that workforce sustainability, quality of healthcare service, and job engagement are positively correlated. Further, the study revealed that workforce sustainability positively and significantly impacts service quality in hospitals (22.4%), and job engagement mediates the workforce sustainability and quality of healthcare services.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J24, M12, I11, O53
-
References18
-
Tables11
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model
-
- Table 1. Measurement scales employed
- Table 2. Variances in workforce sustainability
- Table 3. Variances in job engagement
- Table 4. Variances in the quality of healthcare service
- Table 5. Relationship analysis of the variables
- Table 6. Research model overview
- Table 7. Model specifications
- Table 8. Research model summary
- Table 9. Model coefficients
- Table 10. Direct effect of the research model
- Table 11. Indirect effect of the research model
-
- Buchan, J., & Perfilieva, G. (2015). Making progress towards health workforce sustainability in the WHO European Region. World Health Organization.
- Carlsson, T., & Kabir, M. H. (2010). Service quality : Expectations, perceptions, and satisfaction about the service quality at Destination Gotland – A case study (Master’s Thesis). Gotland University.
- D’Cunha, S., & Suresh, S. (2015). The measurement of service quality in healthcare: A study in a selected hospital. International Journal of Health Sciences & Research, 5(7), 333-345.
- Gambatese, J., Karakhan, A. A., & Simmons, D. R. (2019). Development of a workforce sustainability model for construction. The Center for Construction Research and Training.
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). Conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
- Houle, S. A., Rich, B. L., Comeau, C. A., Blais, A. R., & Morin, A. J. S. (2022). The job engagement scale: Development and validation of a short form in English and French. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(5), 877-896.
- Indian Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF). (2022). Healthcare Industry Report.
- Kossek, E. E., Valcour, M., & Lirio, P. (2014). The sustainable workforce: Organizational strategies for promoting work-life balance and well-being. In Work and Well-being: A Complete Reference Guide (pp. 295-319). Wiley.
- Kourkouta, L., Iliadis, Ch., Sialakis, Ch., Adamakidou, Th., Ouzounakis, P., & Kleisiaris, Ch. (2021). Quality of health services. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 12(1), 498-502.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
- Mosadeghrad, A. M. (2013). Healthcare service quality: Towards a broad definition. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 26(3), 203-219.
- Mosadeghrad, A. M. (2014). Factors affecting medical service quality. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 43(2), 210-220.
- OECD. (2017). Caring for quality in health: Lessons learned from 15 reviews of health care quality (OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Ofori-Boateng, C. (2021, March 13). Why you should prioritize “workforce sustainability” for your company’s culture. Forbes.
- Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
- Ramya, N., Kowsalya, A., & Dharanipriya, K. (2019). Service quality and its dimensions. International Journal of Research and Development, 4(2), 39-41.
- Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635.
- WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2018). The toolkit for a sustainable health workforce in the WHO European Region.