Performance measurement of Islamic philanthropic institution during pandemic in Indonesia: A balanced scorecard approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.27
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #4, pp. 347-360
- Cited by
- 344 Views
-
109 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to analyze the performance of Islamic philanthropic institution during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021) by using a balanced scorecard approach. The balanced scorecard assesses a company or institution based on four perspectives: finance, customer, internal business, and growth and learning. For internal business and growth and learning performance perspectives, data were taken from interviews, and the annual report of the institution was taken for a finance perspective. For customer perspectives, the study used a questionnaire distributed to 100 respondents who are regular donors to philanthropic institution. They play an essential role because regardless of the economic conditions that occur, they are still obliged to donate as a form of the obligation of a rich Muslim to pay zakat. The results showed that the customer perspective had the highest value in its performance results compared to the other three perspectives. Islamic philanthropic institution has a high orientation to customers where customer satisfaction is prioritized in improving the performance of zakat institutions, especially during the pandemic. This is in line with the performance of Islamic philanthropic institution, which continues to increase performance during the pandemic. Despite experiencing a decline in zakat funds in the second wave of COVID-19, Islamic philanthropic institution increased infaq and sadaqah funds during the same period.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the Research and Innovation Institute (LRI), Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, for the enormous financial support in writing this research through the HIT funding scheme with number 01/A.6-II/FAI/1/2022.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G23, G34, L25, L31, M10
-
References36
-
Tables15
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Key performance indicators (KPI)
- Table 2. Balanced scorecard perspective weighting
- Table 3. ZIS fund collection
- Table 4. ZIS fund efficiency distribution
- Table 5. Financial perspective of BSC score
- Table 6. Validity and reliability test
- Table 7. Customer perspective of BSC score
- Table 8. Innovation
- Table 9. LAZISMU UMS innovation
- Table 10. Internal business perspective of BSC score
- Table 11. Employee retention
- Table 12. Learning and growth of BSC score
- Table 13. Total balanced scorecard score
- Table 14. Balanced scorecard rank
- Table 15. Criteria of performance measurement
-
- Abraham, A. (2006). Financial management in the non-profit sector: A mission-based approach to ratio analysis in membership organizations. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), 212-217.
- Alam, A., Hamidah, R. A., Anggraeni, A., & Nizam, R. S. (2021). An assessment of zakat contributions for productive purposes to empower the Mustahik economy in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic. ZISWAF: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 8(2), 154-167.
- Alewine, H. C., & Miller, T. C. (2016). How balanced scorecard format and reputation related to environmental objectives influence performance evaluations. In Advances in Management Accounting (pp. 123-165). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Bastiar, Y., & Bahri, E. S. (2019). Model pengakuran kinerja lembaga zakat di Indonesia [Model for measuring the performance of zakat institutions in Indonesia]. ZISWAF: Jurnal Zakat dan Wakaf, 6(1), 43-64. (In Indonesian).
- Bobe, B. J., Mihret, D. G., & Obo, D. D. (2017). Public-sector reforms and balanced scorecard adoption: An Ethiopian case study. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(6), 1230-1256.
- Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
- Bowling, A. (2005). Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. Journal of Public Health, 27(3), 281-291.
- Chan, A. P. C., & Chan, A. P. L. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2), 203-221.
- Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443-455.
- Febriandika, N. R., Hakimi, F., Awalliyah, M., & Yayuli. (2023). Contagion and spillover effects of global financial markets on the Indonesian Sharia Stock Index post-COVID-19. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(3), 35-47.
- Febriandika, N. R., Millatina, A. N., Luthfiyatillah, & Herianingrum, S. (2020). Customer e-loyalty of Muslim millennials in Indonesia: Integrated model of trust, user experience and branding in e-commerce webstore. IC4E ‘20: Proceedings of the 2020 11th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (pp. 369-376).
- Febriandika, N. R., Wati, R. M., & Hasanah, M. (2023). Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: The reaction of Islamic stocks in the energy sector of Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(1), 218-227.
- Febriandika, N. R., Wijaya, V., & Hakim, L. (2023). Gen-Z Muslims’ purchase intention of halal food: Evidence from Indonesia. Innovative Marketing, 19(1), 13-25.
- Funna, H. S. R., & Suazhari, S. (2019). Analisis pengukuran kinerja koperasi syariah berdasarkan balanced scorecard (Studi pada Koperasi Syariah Baiturrahman Banda Aceh) [Analysis of performance measurement of sharia cooperatives based on balanced scorecard: Study on Baiturrahman Sharia Cooperative Banda Aceh]. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 4(3), 532-546. (In Indonesian).
- Gavrea, C., Ilies, L., & Stegerean, R. (2011). Determinants of organizational performance: The case of Romania. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 6(2), 285-300.
- Harahap, A. W., Mas’ut, Ilmiha, J., & Effendi, S. (2021). Analisis growth ratio, rasio efektivitas dan efisiensi pada badan pengelola pajak dan retribusi daerah kota medan [Analysis of growth ratios, effectiveness and efficiency ratios in Medan city regional tax and levy management bodies]. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Multiparadigma (JRAM), 8(1), 39-44.
- Hasan, R. U., & Chui, T. M. (2017). Practical application of balanced scorecard – A literature review. Journal of Strategy and Performance Management, 5(3), 87-103.
- Hladchenko, M. (2015). Balanced scorecard – A strategic management system of the higher education institution. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(2), 167-176.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Bussiness Review.
- Keser Ozmantar, Z., & Gedikoglu, T. (2016). Design principles for the development of the balanced scorecard. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(5), 622-634.
- Lebas, M., & Euske, K. (2002). A conceptual and operational delineation of performance. In A. Neely (Ed.), Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice (pp. 65-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Llach, J., Bagur, L., Perramon, J., & Marimon, F. (2017). Creating value through the balanced scorecard: How does it work? Management Decision, 55(10), 2181-2199.
- Martunis, A., Dalimunthe, R., Amalia, K., Juanita, J., Syahputra, H., Adam, M., & Masyudi, M. (2020). Adaptation of the balanced scorecard model to measure performance of the departments at Dr Zainoel Abidin Regional General Hospital, Banda Aceh. Journal of Modelling in Management, 15(2), 365-379.
- Owusu, A., & Liu, S. (rev.ed.). (2017). Business intelligence systems and bank performance in Ghana: The balanced scorecard approach. Cogent Business and Management, 4(1), 1364056.
- Quesado, P., Guzmán, B. A., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2018). Advantages and contributions in the balanced scorecard implementation. Omnia Science, 14(1), 186-201.
- Rachmawati, E., Umniyatun, Y., Rosyidi, M., & Nurmansyah, M. I. (2022). The roles of Islamic faith-based organizations on countermeasures against the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(2), e08928.
- Rustam, H. K., & Tentama, F. (2020). Creating academic stress scale and the application for students: Validity and reliability test in psychometrics. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(1).
- Sanchez-Marquez, R., Albarracín Guillem, J. M., Vicens-Salort, E., Jabaloyes Vivas, J., & Ardito, L. (rev.ed.). (2020). A systemic methodology for the reduction of complexity of the balanced scorecard in the manufacturing environment. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1720944.
- Saputro, E. G., & Sidiq, S. (2020). The role of Zakat, Infaq and Shadaqah (ZIS) in reducing poverty in Aceh Province. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 3(3), 63-94.
- Sartor, M. (2019). The balanced scorecard. In Quality management: Tools, methods, and standards (pp. 55-76). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63-74.
- Sulastiningsih, S., Wikaningtyas, S. U., & Novitasari, D. (2020). Improving performance of Zakat institution in poverty alleviation: Balanced scorecard approach. Islamic Finance and Business Review, 14(2), 142-163.
- Swandaru, R., & Mohsin, M. I. A. (2022). Role of zakat in responding to COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learnt and way forward. In M. K. Hassan, A. Muneeza, & A. M. Sarea (Eds.), Towards a Post-Covid Global Financial System (pp. 185-200). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Syamsudin, S., Cahya, B. T., & Dewi, S. N. (2015). Pengaruh kinerja keuangan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi, pengangguran, dan kemiskinan [The influence of financial performance on economic growth, unemployment and poverty]. Jurnal Manajemen Dayasaing, 17(1), 15-27. (In Indonesian).
- Tuan, T. T. (2020). The impact of balanced scorecard on performance: The case of Vietnamese commercial banks. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 71-79.
- Windiastuti, C. F., & Athief, F. N. N. (2019). Inacoin cryptocurrency analysis: An Islamic law perspective. Journal of Islamic Economic Laws, 2(2), 152-177.