Company management decision-making based on the analysis of events after the reporting period
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.55
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #4, pp. 740-756
- Cited by
- 200 Views
-
58 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The study aims to discuss the impact of the analysis of events after the reporting date (subsequent events) on management decision-making. In the interval between the end of the reporting period and the publication of the annual financial report, company management may learn about events that either occurred during the reporting period but were previously unknown or occurred when the financial report was already prepared but not approved. The consequences of these events can be so serious that they require adjustments to the financial statements, changes in the company’s strategy and tactics, and radical management transformations. The paper structures such events depending on their impact on business performance and the procedure for reporting and identifies the determinants and mechanisms for their analysis and correct accounting. To assess the complex impact of events after the reporting period on the financial results of a company, an integral indicator is proposed, a set of management measures is defined in accordance with the values of this indicator, and the mechanism for its calculation and use is demonstrated on the example of a hypothetical scenario. The sensitivity analysis of this indicator to fluctuations in the weighting coefficients of its components was performed using the Monte Carlo method. In an environment where transparency, accountability, trust between key stakeholders, adaptability, and proactivity are crucial for effective management, this indicator can be used as an effective metric that is taken into account by auditors, regulators, clients, investors, company management, etc.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, M10, G14
-
References41
-
Tables3
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Areas of methodologies for analyzing events after the reporting period
- Figure 2. Steps of determining an integral indicator
- Figure A1. The procedure for reflecting events after the reporting period
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of the obtained values of the integral index of events after the reporting period
- Table B1. Examples of favorable and unfavorable events after the reporting period
- Table B2. Methods and approaches to assess events after the reporting period
-
- Alabdullah, T. T. Y. (2023). The impact of financial technology and risk management practices on corporate financial system profitability: evidence from Kuwait. SocioEconomic Challenges, 7(3), 141-151.
- Alharbi, A. M., & Al-Adeem, K. R. (2022). A defense on accounting discretion: An empirical inquiry based on users’ awareness. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(3), 26-39.
- AL-Hashimi, Y. N., AL-Toobi, J. S., & Ahmed, E. R. (2023). The influence of corporate governance on firm performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(1), 109-122.
- Allegrini, V., & Monteduro, F. (2018). The role of uncertainty in performance information disclosure. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(5), 583-598.
- Argento, D., Kaarboe, K., & Vakkuri, J. (2020). Constructing certainty through public budgeting: budgetary responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(5), 875-887.
- Aseeri, M., & Kang, K. (2022). Big data, oriented-organizational culture, and business performance: A socio-technical approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 52-66.
- Beasley, D. E., Bonisoli-Alquati, A., & Mousseau, T. A. (2013). The use of fluctuating asymmetry as a measure of environmentally induced developmental instability: A meta-analysis. Ecological Indicators, 30, 218-226.
- Bentley-Goode, K. A., Newton, N. J., & Thompson, A. M. (2017). Business strategy, internal control over financial reporting, and audit reporting quality. Auditing, 36(4), 49-69.
- Bilan, S., Šuleř, P., Skrynnyk, O., Krajňáková, E., & Vasilyeva, T. (2022). Systematic bibliometric review of artificial intelligence technology in organizational management, development, change and culture. Business: Theory & Practice, 23(1), 1-13.
- Boiko, M., Kulyk, M., Bondar, S., Romanchuk, L., & Lositska, T. (2023). Consumer engagement in the conditions of business digitization: A case study of the hotel industry in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 113-124.
- Brychko, M., Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., & Streimikiene, D. (2023). Do changes in the business environment and sustainable development really matter for enhancing enterprise development? Sustainable Development, 31(2), 587-599.
- Carson, E., & Dowling, C. (2012). The competitive advantage of audit support systems: The relationship between extent of structure and audit pricing. Journal of Information Systems, 26(1), 35-49.
- Chung, J. O. Y., C. P. Cullinan, M. Frank, J. H., & Long, J. Mueller-Phillips, & O’Reilly, D. M. (2013). The auditor’s approach to subsequent events: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Suppl_1), 167-207.
- Czerney, K., Schmidt, J. J., Thompson, A. M., & Zhu, W. (2020). Do type II subsequent events impair financial reporting quality? Accounting Review, 95(6), 97-123.
- Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C.R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17-82.
- Donatella, P. (2022). Further evidence on the relationship between audit industry specialisation and public sector audit quality. Financial Accountability and Management, 38(4), 512-529.
- Dotsenko, T., Dvořák, M., Lyeonov, S., & Kovács, A. (2023). Socially relevant factors of organizational mortality of enterprises: Context of corporate sustainability in European countries. Economics & Sociology, 16(1), 299-314.
- Dzwigol, H. (2019). The concept of the system approach of the enterprise restructuring process. Virtual Economics, 2(4), 46-70.
- Dzwigol, H. (2020). Methodological and empirical platform of triangulation in strategic management. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 1-8.
- Dzwigol, H. (2022). Research methodology in management science: Triangulation. Virtual Economics, 5(1), 78-93.
- Dźwigoł, H., & Wolniak, R. (2018). Controlling in the management process of a chemical industry production company. Przemysl Chemiczny, 97(7), 1114-1116.
- Dzwigol, H., Shcherbak, S., Semikina, M., Vinichenko, O., & Vasiuta, V. (2019). Formation of strategic change management system at an enterprise. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 1-8.
- Filatova, H., Vasylieva, T., Vynnychenko, N., Ballova, M., & Gedeon, M. (2022). Accounting support for sustainability reporting: Theoretical foundations and bibliometric analysis. Accounting and Financial Control, 4(1), 1-13.
- Ghosh, D., & Olsen, L. (2009). Environmental uncertainty and managers’ use of discretionary accruals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 188-205.
- Herda, D. N., & Lavelle, J. J. (2014). Auditing subsequent events: Perspectives from the field. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), A10-A24.
- IAS 10. (2023). IAS 10 events after the reporting period. IFRS.
- Kwilinski, A. (2019). Implementation of blockchain technology in accounting sphere. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(SI2), 1-6.
- Lee, T. H., & Boynton, L. A. (2017). Conceptualizing transparency: Propositions for the integration of situational factors and stakeholders’ perspectives. Public Relations Inquiry, 6(3), 233-251.
- Lyeonov, S., Zakharkin, O., & Okhrimchuk, Y. (2023). Information openness as a factor of business leadership in today’s digital environment. In W. Strielkowski (Ed.), Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development Post COVID-19 (pp. 287-300). Springer.
- Makarenko, I., & Makarenko, S. (2022). Multi-level benchmark system for sustainability reporting: EU experience for Ukraine. Accounting and Financial Control, 4(1), 41-48.
- Mandryka, V., Mandryka, K., Yevdokymova, A., Matsenko, O., & Melnyk, L. (2023). Management decisions regarding innovative projects at their early stages of development: An example of a methodology for assessing crypto projects. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 316-333.
- Michels, J. (2017). Disclosure versus recognition: Inferences from subsequent events. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(1), 3-34.
- Mursalov, M., Yarovenko, H., & Vasilyeva, T. (2023). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and digitalization: relationship and synergy of development. In W. Strielkowski (Ed.), Leadership, Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development Post COVID-19 (pp. 109-127). Springer.
- Olowookere, J. K., Oluwatuyi, A. O., & Oladejo, M. O. (2022). Determinants of audit quality among consumer goods companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(1), 113-122.
- Seguer, Z. S., & Hasna, A.M. (2022). Business intelligence as a challenge for the managerial function: Case study on managerial decision making in Algerian companies. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(3), 35-46.
- Sivaruban, S. (2023). Impact of corporate governance practices on financial performance of listed companies in Papua New Guinea. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 7(3), 48-56.
- Skrynnyk, O. (2023). Prediction of convergent and divergent determinants of organisational development. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 74-81.
- Skrynnyk, O., & Vasilyeva, T. (2020). Neuro-genetic hybrid system for management of organizational development measures. CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
- Skrynnyk, O., & Vasylieva, T. (2022). The prediction of leadership degree based on machine learning. In O. Ignatenko, V. Kharchenko, V. Kobets, H. Kravtsov, Y. Tarasich, V. Ermolayev, D. Esteban, V. Yakovyna, & A. Spivakovsky (Eds.), Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 82-96). Springer.
- Tajani, F., Guarini, M. R., Sica, F., Ranieri, R., & Anelli, D. (2022). Multi-criteria analysis and sustainable accounting. Defining indices of sustainability under Choquet’s integral. Sustainability, 14(5), 2782.
- Vasilyeva, T., Kuzmenko, O., Bozhenko, V., & Kolotilina, O. (2019). Assessment of the dynamics of bifurcation transformations in the economy. SHS Web of Conferences, 65, 04006.