The moderating effect of competitive intensity on foresight capability and product innovation of SMEs in Indonesia
-
Received August 19, 2022;Accepted February 1, 2023;Published February 10, 2023
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9070-1051
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(1).2023.19
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #1, pp. 219-229
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 557 Views
-
282 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to understand the performance of SME’s product innovation by relating it to the foresight concept of SME owners or managers and the moderating effect of competitive intensity. It employs a quantitative research method by using a survey. This paper studies SMEs from the West Java Province of Indonesia in three industrial sectors: food, fashion, and handicrafts. These industrial sectors were chosen because they are the most competitive, and their consumers change rapidly. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire. A total of 200 questionnaires were distributed, 190 were returned, and 187 were used for data processing. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results show that networking, time horizon, and analysis can affect product innovation performance (p < 0.05). Furthermore, competition intensity does not affect the relationship between analysis and product innovation performance, although there is a relationship between networking and time horizon. The results of this study provide insight for Indonesian SMEs, especially in West Java. Foresight skills trained by SMEs will make them accustomed to facing high-level competition, especially in the time horizon dimension. However, on the other hand, the high intensity of competition can reduce their networking to collaborate with various related parties.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M21, L25
-
References55
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
- Figure 2. Visualization of path coefficients
-
- Table 1. Demographics of respondents
- Table 2. Reliability, validity, and measurement
- Table 3. Path coefficients
- Table 4. Summary of moderating effect of competitive intensity
-
- Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 333-346.
- Amsteus, M. (2011). Managerial foresight: Measurement scale and estimation. Foresight, 13(1), 58-76.
- Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1652-1661.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
- Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443-464.
- Barnett, W. P. (1997). The dynamics of competitive intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 128-160.
- Baškarada, S., Shrimpton, D., & Ng, S. (2016). Learning through foresight. Foresight, 18(4), 414-433.
- Chang, C. H. (2016). The determinants of green product innovation performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(2), 65-76.
- Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Benitez-Amado, J., & Kou, G. (2015). IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity. Information & Management, 52(6), 643-657.
- Chin, T. A., Hamid, A. B. A., Rasli, A., & Tat, H. H. (2014). A literature analysis on the relationship between external integration, environmental uncertainty and firm performance in Malaysian SMEs. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 75-84.
- Chinnapong, P., Aujirapongpan, S., Koompai, S., Dowpiset, K., & Jiraphanumes, K. (2021). The effect of information technology and dynamic capabilities on human resources competencies and innovative performance. ABAC Journal, 41(4), 198-223.
- Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
- De Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95-112.
- Feranita, N. V., Nugraha, A., & Sukoco, S. A. (2020). Effect of transformational and transactional leadership on SMEs in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 415-425.
- Gilmore, A., Carson, D., & Rocks, S. (2006). Networking in SMEs: Evaluating its contribution to marketing activity. International Business Review, 15(3), 278-293.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
- Horton, A. (1999). A simple guide to successful foresight. Foresight, 1(1), 5-9.
- Jones, J. L. S., & Linderman, K. (2014). Process management, innovation and efficiency performance: The moderating effect of competitive intensity. Business Process Management Journal, 20(2), 335-358.
- Kaivo-oja, J. R. L., & Lauraeus, I. T. (2018). The VUCA approach as a solution concept to corporate foresight challenges and global technological disruption. Foresight, 20(1), 27-49.
- Kathan, W., Matzler, K., Füller, J., Hautz, J., & Hutter, K. (2014). Open innovation in SMEs: A case study of a regional open innovation platform. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 12(1-1), 161-171.
- Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. (1999). The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic management journal, 20(4), 317-338.
- Lyu, C., Zhang, F., Ji, J., Teo, T. S. H., Wang, T., & Liu, Z. (2022). Competitive intensity and new product development outcomes: The roles of knowledge integration and organizational unlearning. Journal of Business Research, 139, 121-133.
- Martínez-Román, J. A., Gamero, J., & Tamayo, J. A. (2011). Analysis of innovation in SMEs using an innovative capability-based non-linear model: A study in the province of Seville (Spain). Technovation, 31(9), 459-475.
- Milshina, Y., & Vishnevskiy, K. (2018). Potentials of collaborative foresight for SMEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(6), 701-717.
- Nyuur, R. B., Brečić, R., & Sobiesuo, P. (2015). Foresight capabilities and SME product/service adaptiveness: The moderating effect of industry dynamism. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 10(2-4), 145-164.
- Paliokaité, A. (2010). Networking as a route for corporate foresight in SMEs (IET Working Papers Series 10/2010). Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CICS.NOVA-Interdisciplinary Centre on Social Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology.
- Paliokaitė, A., Pačėsa, N., & Sarpong, D. (2014). Conceptualizing strategic foresight: An integrated framework. Strategic Сhange, 23(3-4), 161-169.
- Piirainen, K. A., & Gonzalez, R. A. (2015). Theory of and within foresight – “What does a theory of foresight even mean?”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 191-201.
- Popper, R. (2008). How are foresight methods selected? Foresight, 10(6), 62-89.
- Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial Analysts Journal, 36(4), 30-41.
- Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499-515.
- Pullen, A., De Weerd-Nederhof, P., Groen, A., Song, M., & Fisscher, O. (2009). Successful patterns of internal SME characteristics leading to high overall innovation performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(3), 209-223.
- Rastegari, H., Hosseini, S. H., & Ghayoor, H. (2020). Designing and developing the strategic foresight capabilities of medical universities in the accidents and crises of the country with emphasis on human resource agility. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 36(1), 124-137.
- Rohrbeck, R., & Gemünden, H. G. (2008). Strategic foresight in multinational enterprises: Building a best-practice framework from case studies. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference Emerging Methods in R&D Management.
- Rohrbeck, R., & Gemünden, H. G. (2011). Corporate foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of a firm. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 231-243.
- Sarpong, D., & Meissner, D. (2018). Special issue on ‘corporate foresight and innovation management.’ Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(6), 625-632.
- Semke, L.-M., & Tiberius, V. (2020). Corporate foresight and dynamic capabilities: An exploratory study. Forecasting, 2(2), 180-193.
- Slaughter, R. A. (1996). Foresight beyond strategy: Social initiatives by business and government. Long Range Planning, 29(2), 156-163.
- Slaughter, R. A. (2008). What difference does ‘integral’ make? Futures, 40(2), 120-137.
- Spanos, Y. E., & Prastacos, G. P. (2004). The effects of environment, structure, and dynamic capabilities on product innovation strategy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4(6), 620-638.
- Tsai, K.-H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765-778.
- Ueasangkomsate, P., Atthawej, T., & Sudharatna, Y. (2021). Influence of knowledge management orientation on performance with innovativeness in SMEs. ABAC Journal, 41(4), 126-146.
- Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., Kimzan, H. S., & Sert, H. (2018). The impact of environmental uncertainty dimensions on organisational innovativeness: An empirical study on SMEs. In Promoting innovation in new ventures and small-and medium-sized enterprises (pp. 151-175). World Scientific.
- Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437.
- Vanags, A. (2018). Partnership strategy model for small and medium enterprises. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 336-347.
- Vecchiato, R. (2012). Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making: An integrated study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 436-447.
- Vecchiato, R., Favato, G., Di Maddaloni, F., & Do, H. (2020). Foresight, cognition, and long-term performance: Insights from the automotive industry and opportunities for future research. Futures & Foresight Science, 2(1), e25.
- Vishnevskiy, K., & Egorova, O. G. (2015). Strategic foresight for SMEs: choice of the most relevant methods. Proceedings of the XXVI ISPIM Conference – Shaping the Frontiers of Innovation Management. Budapest, Hungary.
- Vishnevskiy, K., Karasev, O., & Meissner, D. (2015). Integrated roadmaps and corporate foresight as tools of innovation management: The case of Russian companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 433-443.
- Volberda, H. W. (1996). Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science, 7(4), 359-374.
- Weerawardena, J. (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11(1), 15-35.
- Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 72-96.
- Yoon, J., Kim, Y., Vonortas, N. S., & Han, S. W. (2018). Corporate foresight and innovation: The effects of integrative capabilities and organisational learning. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(6), 633-645.
- Zahra, S. A. (1996). Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713-1735.
-
-
Conceptualization
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Data curation
Vigory Gloriman Manalu
-
Formal Analysis
Vigory Gloriman Manalu
-
Funding acquisition
Vigory Gloriman Manalu
-
Investigation
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Methodology
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Project administration
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Resources
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Software
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Validation
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Visualization
Vigory Gloriman Manalu
-
Writing – original draft
Vigory Gloriman Manalu
-
Writing – review & editing
Vigory Gloriman Manalu, Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Supervision
Siti Nurhayati, Refius Pradipta Setyanto
-
Conceptualization