A strategic framework for developing sustainable value propositions
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(4).2022.31
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #4, pp. 407-421
- 408 Views
-
258 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The discussion on firms’ sustainability performance has resulted in business organizations becoming more conscious of sustainability issues and implementing strategies to ensure sustainable value propositions. The purpose of this study is to explore strategies that firms could use to develop sustainable value propositions. Through an extensive literature review, the study proposed a conceptual framework and further developed hypotheses suggesting that the strategies such as stakeholder involvement, flexible decision-making, and social and environmental values could influence sustainable value propositions. The hypotheses were tested through quantitative research analysis using data collected from owners/managers in 143 SMEs in the coastal areas of Ghana. The data supported almost all the hypotheses, namely H1, H2, and H5-H8 with T-values and P-values of > 1.96 and < 0.05, respectively. This finding indicates that all three core antecedents of sustainable value propositions contributed 78 percent of variations in the model. However, contrary to expectations, the result also showed that shareholder orientation and employee orientation with T-values and P-values of ˂ 1.96 and ˃ 0.05, respectively, did not support sustainable value propositions resulting in rejecting H3 and H4. Despite this outcome, the study concludes that all three strategies are relevant and valuable to firms in developing sustainable value propositions.
Acknowledgment
This paper was supported by IGA/FaME/2021/004: SME Innovation Performance, Firm Sustainability performance and Influence of Pandemic on Entrepreneurial wellbeing.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, M19
-
References71
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure A1. Estimated research model: Output model
-
- Table 1. Socio-demographic profile of respondents
- Table 2. Construct reliability
- Table 3. Constructs, indicators, loadings, and variance inflation factor
- Table 4. Test of discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion)
- Table 5. Analysis of hypothetical paths
- Table 6. Predictive power of the model
-
- Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Danso, A., Konadu, R., & Owusu-Agyei, S. (2019). Environmental sustainability orientation and performance of family and nonfamily firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1250-1259.
- Al Buraiki, M. A., & Rahman Khan, D. M. F. (2018). Finance and Technology: Key Challenges Faced By Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Oman. International Journal of Management, Innovation & Entrepreneurial Research, 4(2), 01-12.
- Alacreu-Crespo, A., Fuentes, M. C., Abad-Tortosa, D., Cano-Lopez, I., González, E., & Serrano, M. Á. (2019). Spanish validation of General Decision-Making Style scale: Sex invariance, sex differences and relationships with personality and coping styles. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(6), 739-751.
- Antonopoulou, K., & Begkos, C. (2020). Strategizing for digital innovations: Value propositions for transcending market boundaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 120042.
- Armstrong, J. S., & Collopy, F. (1996). Competitor orientation: Effects of objectives and information on managerial decisions and profitability. Journal of marketing research, 33(2), 188-199.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
- Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. M. P., & Jaskiewicz, T. (2017). Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design. Journal of cleaner production, 147, 175-186.
- Balmer, J., & Burghausen, M. (2015). Introducing organisational heritage: Linking corporate heritage, organisational identity and organisational memory. Journal of Brand Management, 22, 385-411.
- Barbosa, M., Castañeda -Ayarza, J. A., & Lombardo Ferreira, D. H. (2020). Sustainable Strategic Management (GES): Sustainability in small business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120880.
- Black, K. (2019). Business statistics: for contemporary decision making. John Wiley & Sons.
- Boachie-Mensah, F. O., & Owusu Yeboah, A. Y. (2015). Environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility and brand equity. European Journal of Applied Business Management, 1(2), 17.
- Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56.
- Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Brundtland report. Our common future. Comissão Mundial, 4(1), 17-25.
- Calik, E., & Bardudeen, F. (2016). A Measurement Scale to Evaluate Sustainable Innovation Performance in Manufacturing Organizations. Procedia CIRP, 40, 449-454.
- Chan, H., He, H., & Wang, W. (2012). Green marketing and its impact on supply chain management in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 557-562.
- Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015). Service Systems: A Broadened Framework and Research Agenda on Value Propositions, Engagement, and Service Experience. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 6-22.
- Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385-403.
- Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 22(1), 29-49.
- Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297-316.
- Egui, E., Kuo, P. C., Mba, P. S., Nelson, M., Aranha, G. V., Abood, G., Godellas, C. V., & Baker, M. S. (2019). The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy is a value-added proposition for patients undergoing care in moderate-volume and high-volume centers. Surgery, 166(2), 166-171.
- Eisenfuhr, F. (2011). Decision making. New York, NY: Springer.
- Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental quality management, 8(1), 37-51.
- Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
- Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European journal of marketing, 45(1/2), 223-240.
- Gilles, N., & Christine, L. C. (2016). The Sustainable value proposition of PSSs: the case of ECOBEL “Shower head”. Procedia CIRP, 47, 12-17.
- Greenley, G. E., Hooley, G. J., Broderick, A. J., & Rudd, J. M. (2004). Strategic planning differences among different multiple stakeholder orientation profiles. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 12(3), 163-182.
- Grönroos, C., & Ravald, A. (2011). Service as business logic: Implications for value creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 5-22.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
- Henseler, J. (2017). Adanco 2.0. 1-User manual. Kleve: Composite Modeling GmbH & Co.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hojnik, J., Biloslavo, R., Cicero, L., & Cagnina, M. R. (2020). Sustainability indicators for the yachting industry: Empirical conceptualization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119368.
- Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management: Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, and a Conceptual Framework. Organization & Environment, 27(4), 328-346.
- Jakada, M. B., Kassim, S. I., Hussaini, A., Mohammed, A. I., & Rabi’u, A. (2020). Construct validity and reliability of individual work performance questionnaire. Ilorin Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(2), 155-164.
- Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
- Johnstone, L., & Lindh, C. (2018). The sustainability-age dilemma: A theory of (un)planned behaviour via influencers. Journal of consumer behaviour, 17(1), e127-e139.
- Jumbam, D. T., Reddy, C. L., Makasa, E., Boatin, A. A., Rogo, K., Chu, K. M., Nangombe, B., Oladapo, O. T., Meara, J. G., & Maswime, S. (2020). Investing in surgery: A value proposition for African leaders. The Lancet, 396(10243), 7-9.
- Khan, G. F., Sarstedt, M., Shiau, W.-L., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Fritze, M. P. (2019). Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internet Research.
- Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261.
- Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: Free Press.
- Kristensen, H. S., & Remmen, A. (2019). A framework for sustainable value propositions in product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 25-35.
- Kwarteng, M. A., Jibril, A. B., Nwaiwu, F., Pilík, M., & Chovancova, M. (2021). The prospects of Internet-Based Channel Orientation for the competitiveness of service companies on the domestic market. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102223.
- Lee, C. M. J., Che-Ha, N., & Syed Alwi, S. F. (2021). Service customer orientation and social sustainability: The case of small medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 122, 751-760.
- Leung, S.-O. (2011). A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412-421.
- Liu, G., Liston-Heyes, C., & Ko, W. W. (2010). Employee participation in cause-related marketing strategies: A study of management perceptions from British consumer service industries. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 195-210.
- Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). The decision-making process. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27(4).
- Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Barua, M. K. (2014). Flexible decision approach for analysing performance of sustainable supply chains under risks/uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(2), 113-130.
- Mangla, S., Madaan, J., & Chan, F. T. (2013). Analysis of flexible decision strategies for sustainability-focused green product recovery system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3428-3442.
- Manninen, K., Koskela, S., Antikainen, R., Bocken, N., Dahlbo, H., & Aminoff, A. (2018). Do circular economy business models capture intended environmental value propositions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 413-422.
- Mathur, V. N., Price, A. D. F., & Austin, S. (2008). Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 601-609.
- Moore, S. B., & Manring, S. L. (2009). Strategy development in small and medium sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 276-282.
- Morioka, S. N., Evans, S., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Sustainable Business Model Innovation: Exploring Evidences in Sustainability Reporting. Procedia CIRP, 40, 659-667.
- Müller, M. (2012). Design-Driven Innovation for Sustainability: A New Method for Developing a Sustainable Value Proposition. International Journal of Innovation Science, 4(1), 11-24.
- Ormazábal, G. (2018). The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 11(4), 193-290.
- Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition design: How to create products and services customers want (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Owusu Yeboah, A. Y., Kwarteng, M. A., & Novak, P. (2020). Value Creation Through Social Media Marketing: A Threat to Sustainability Performance? In S. K. Sharma, Y. K. Dwivedi, B. Metri, & N. P. Rana (Eds.), Re-imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation (pp. 475-486). Springer International Publishing.
- Patala, S., Jalkala, A., Keränen, J., Väisänen, S., Tuominen, V., & Soukka, R. (2016). Sustainable value propositions: Framework and implications for technology suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 144-156.
- Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017). The customer value proposition: Evolution, development, and application in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(4), 467-489.
- Pedersen, E. R. G., Hove, H. E., Frier, C., Søby, J., & Jennings, V. (2013). Stakeholder thinking in sustainability management: The case of Novozymes. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(4), 500-515.
- Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290-315.
- Samuels, J. M., Wilkes, F. M., & Brayshaw, R. E. (1990). Management of company finance. London: Chapman and Hall.
- Satar, N. S. M., Dastane, O., & Yusnorizam, M. (2019). Customer Value Proposition for E-Commerce: A Case Study Approach. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(2).
- Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(1), 137-163.
- Shiau, W.-L., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internet Research, 29(3), 398-406.
- Taylor, S. A., Hunter, G. L., Zadeh, A. H., Delpechitre, D., & Lim, J. H. (2020). Value propositions in a digitally transformed world. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 256-263.
- Truong, Y., Simmons, G., & Palmer, M. (2012). Reciprocal value propositions in practice: Constraints in digital markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 197-206.
- Waligo, V. M., Clarke, J., & Hawkins, R. (2013). Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework. Tourism Management, 36, 342-353.
- Wiernik, B. M., Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2013). Age and environmental sustainability: a meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7), 826-856.
- Xu, M., & Hu, W. Q. (2020). A research on coordination between economy, society and environment in China: A case study of Jiangsu. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120641.
- Yau, O. H., Chow, R. P., Sin, L. Y., Alan, C. B., Luk, C. L., & Lee, J. S. (2007). Developing a scale for stakeholder orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11-12), 1306-1327.