Self-organization of remote employees in Lithuanian companies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.40
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #2, pp. 486-496
- Cited by
- 514 Views
-
198 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The paper deals with employees’ self-organization as a modern form of organizing a company’s activities in a remote work environment, which was eventual and challenging in the pandemic, but, undoubtedly, is being further developed in companies due to perceived benefits. The aim of the paper is to analyze the self-organization of remote employees. For research methodology, in a quantitative approach, a survey of 196 working remotely employees in various Lithuanian companies by size, industry or sector was conducted using a questionnaire to analyze their self-organization activities and capabilities at the individual, group and organizational level. The survey data were statistically processed and analyzed, indicating percentages, means, medians, standard deviations, and correlations. It was found that for the vast majority of employees (79-91% in different components), self-organization is most developed at the level of individual work while working remotely. This allows employees to achieve a work-life balance and greater job satisfaction. However, the involvement of remote employees via self-organizing of group activities and decision-making as well as solution of problems important to the company in a competitive environment, is not sufficiently developed. In practice, this means that self-organization of their individual work can be delegated to employees, but more efforts are needed to involve remote employees in management processes.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M12
-
References27
-
Tables0
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Assessing self-organization components mostly used in remote work
- Figure 2. Assessing aspects of remote work
-
- Acienė, E. (2020). Work at Home as Challenge: Mission (Im)possible? Latvian Christian Academy, 6, 197-209.
- Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68.
- Beauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A., & Canónico, E. (2019). Telework: Outcomes and facilitators for employees. In R. N. Landers, The Cambridge handbook of technology and employee behavior (pp. 511-543). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Beno, M. (2021). The Advantages and Disadvantages of E-working: An Examination using an Aldine Analysis. Emerging Science Journal, 5, 11-20.
- Buck, J. A., & Endenburg, G. (Ed.). (2010). The Creative Forces of Self-Organization. Rotterdam: Sociocratic Center.
- Chertow, M., & Ehrenfeld, J. (2012). Organizing Self-Organizing Systems. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, 16(1), 13-27, February.
- Eseryel, U. Y., Crowston, K., & Heckman, R. (2021). Functional and visionary leadership in self-managing virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 46(2), 424-460.
- EUROSTAT. (2021). Working from home in the EU, (2021).
- Global Workplace Analytics (2021). Remote work Trend Data.
- Grumadaitė, K. (2018). Saviorganizacija grindžiamų industrinių sistemų formavimosi įgalinimas. Kaunas: Technologiya. (In Lithuanian).
- Grumadaitė, K., & Jucevičius, G. (2017). Klasterių Lietuvoje radimosi prielaidos: nuo neformalaus bendradarbiavimo iki jo įteisinimo. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, 77, 37-56. (In Lithuanian).
- He, Z., Rayman-Bacchus, L., & Wu, Y. (2011). Selforganization of Industrial Clustering in a Transition Economy: A Proposed Framework and Case Study Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40(10), 1280-1294.
- Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports and shared team leadership.
- Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. New York: Perseus Books.
- Hudson, C. G. (2005). The dynamics of self-organization: Neglected dimensions. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 10(4), 17-38.
- Lee, M. Y., & Edmundson, A. C. (2017). Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 35-58.
- Martela, F. (2019). What makes self-managing organizations novel? Comparing how Weberian bureaucracy, Mintzberg’s adhocracy, and self-organizing solve six fundamental problems of organizing. Journal of Organization Design, 8(23), 1-23.
- Mason, R. B. (2007). The External Environment’s Effect on Management and Strategy: A Complexity Theory Approach. Management Decision, 45(1), 10-28.
- Nakrošienė, A., & Butkevičienė, E. (2016). Nuotolinis darbas Lietuvoje: samprata, privalumai ir iššūkiai darbuotojams. Filosofija. Sociologija, 27(4), 364-372. (In Lithuanian).
- Narayanan, L., Menon, S., Plaisent, M., & Bernard, P. (2017). Telecommuting: The Work Anywhere, Anyplace, Anytime Organization in the 21st Century. Journal of Marketing and Management, 8(2), 47-54.
- Parkinson, D. (2006). Oxford Business English Dictionary for learners of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature (Vol. 13). New York: Bantam Books.
- Shin, B., Sheng, L. O. R., & Higa, K. (2000). Telework: Existing Research and Future Directions. Journal of Organisational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 85-101.
- Shirokaja, M. J., & Zukova, O. I. (2021). Self-organization and self-control of remote work specialists with different individual typological characteristics during Covid-19. East European Scientific Journal, 11(75), 66-71.
- Stankevičienė, A., & Grincevičienė, N. (2021). Nuotolinis darbas: kas iš jo laimi, kas nukenčia? Spectrum, 2(34), 2-7. (In Lithuanian).
- Tavares, A. I. (2017). Remote work and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare, 3(2), 30-36.
- Wontorczyk, A., & Rożnowski, B. (2022). Remote, Hybrid, and On-Site Work during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and the Consequences for Stress and Work Engagement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2400, February 2022.