Trade openness and economic growth: Evidence from Azerbaijan
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.45
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #1, pp. 564-572
- Cited by
- 722 Views
-
391 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
A review of modern economic literature shows the lack of consensus on the relationship between the trade openness policy and the economic growth of countries. There is also an opinion that the policy of openness in emerging and resource-rich countries presents more opportunities for growth and development. Is this true, and under what conditions does openness lead to growth? Exploring the nature of trade openness and economic growth relationship in resource-rich emerging countries is the purpose of this paper. Therefore, the economy of Azerbaijan, rich in hydrocarbon resources, has been chosen as the object of this study. Next, the VAR model using ADF tests and Johansen’s cointegration was chosen to analyze and evaluate the causal nature of the relationship between openness and growth. Trade openness ratio and GDP per capita growth are model variables. The study covers annual data from 1995 to 2020. It was found that there are no cointegration relationships between variables in the long run. However, there is a unidirectional causal relationship from openness to growth in the short run, and the effect of growth to openness is not statistically significant. The results show that Azerbaijan receives economic benefits from openness by selling oil to the world market. Yet, the short-run nature of such benefits and the lack of feedback from growth to openness suggest specific problems in the diversification and quality of the country’s exports.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F10, O24
-
References40
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Dynamics of GDP, exports, and imports of Azerbaijan in 1995–2020 (in millions of USA dollars)
-
- Table 1. ADF test
- Table 2. Johansen test
- Table 3. Unrestricted VAR model
- Table 4. Model quality indicators
-
- Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Akilou, A. (2013). Is there a causal relation between trade openness and economic growth in the WAEMU countries? International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(6), 151-156.
- Awokuse, T. O. (2008). Trade openness and economic growth: is growth export-led or import-led? Applied Economics, 40(2), 161-173.
- Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Brülhart, M. (2011). The spatial effects of trade openness: a survey. Review of World Economics, 147, 59-83.
- Central Bank of Azerbaijan (CBAR). (2021). Makroiqtisadi statistika. (In Azerbaijani).
- Çevik, E. İ., Atukeren, E., & Korkmaz, T. (2019). Trade Openness and Economic Growth in Turkey: A Rolling Frequency Domain Analysis. Economies, 7(2), 41.
- Dar, A., & Amirkhalkhali, S. (2003). On the impact of trade openness on growth: Further evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics, 35(16), 1761-1766.
- Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
- Dowrick, S., & Golley, J. (2004). Trade Openness and Growth: Who Benefits? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 38-56.
- Fetahi-Vehapi, M., Sadiku, L., & Petkovski, M. (2015). Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Trade Openness on Economic Growth: An Evidence for South East European Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 17-26.
- Giovanni, J., & Levchenko, A. A. (2009). Trade Openness and Volatility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 558-585.
- Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.
- Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1986). Forecasting economic time series (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
- Griesa, T., & Redlin, M. (2012). Trade Openness and Economic Growth: A Panel Causality Analysis. University of Paderborn, Germany.
- Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the world economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Haddad, M., Lim, J. J., & Saborowski, C. (2009). Trade openness reduces growth volatility when countries are well diversified. World Bank.
- Hatemi, J. A. (2002). Export performance and economic growth nexus in Japan: A bootstrap approach. Japan and the World Economy, 14(1), 25-33.
- Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 1-25.
- Huchet-Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C., & Vijil, M. (2018).The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, 41(1), 59-76.
- Hussain, Z., Yousaf, M., Raheem, A., & Rahman, I. U. (2019). The simultaneous effects of investment and trade: A perspective of manufacturing growth in Asian Economies. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, XIV, 4(66), 1074-1083.
- Hye, Q. M. A. (2012). Long-term effect of trade openness on economic growth in case of Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 46, 1137-1149.
- Hye, Q. M. A., & Lau, W.-Y. (2015). Trade openness and economic growth: empirical evidence from India. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(1), 188-205.
- Idris, J., Yusop, Z., & Habibullah, M. S. (2017). Trade openness and economic growth: a causality test in panel perspective. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2), 281-290.
- Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
- Keho, Y., & Wang, M. G. (rev.ed.). (2017). The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), 1332820.
- Lütkepohl, H. (2005). New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Mukhtarov, S., Humbatova, S., Seyfullayev, I., & Kalbiyev, Y. (2020). The effect of financial development on energy consumption in the case of Kazakhstan. Journal of Applied Economics, 23(1), 75-88.
- Phillips, P. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for unit roots in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
- Prabirjit, S. (2008). Trade Openness and Growth: Is There Any Link? Journal of Economic Issues, 42(3), 763-785.
- Raghutla, C. (2020). The Effect of Trade Openness on economic growth: Some empirical evidence from emerging market economies. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(3), e2081.
- Reinert, E. S. (2007). How Rich Countries Got Rich … and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London: Public Affairs.
- Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policies for the twenty-first century. Harvard University.
- Sahoo, A. K., Sahoo, D., & Sahu, N. C. (2014). Mining export, industrial production and economic growth: A cointegration and causality analysis for India. Resources Policy, 42, 27-34.
- Seyfullayev, I. (2020). Protectionism and non-resource economic growth: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 121-129.
- Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2011). A New Measure of Trade Openness. The World Economy, 34(10), 1745-1770.
- Tahir, M., & Azid, T. (2015). The relationship between international trade openness and economic growth in the developing economies: Some new dimensions. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 8(2), 123-139.
- Ulaşan, B. (2015). Trade openness and economic growth: panel evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 22(2), 163-167.
- World Bank (WB). (2021). GDP per capita growth (annual %).
- Yanikkaya, H. (2003). Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 57-89.
-
Marketing potential of the Sino-Russian bilateral agricultural export market
Zhang Fenghe
,
Viktoriia Medvid 
,
Lu Xu
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(2).2021.15
Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #2 pp. 164-176 Views: 913 Downloads: 417 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯChina and Russia are important agricultural countries in the world. Expanding exports and increasing sales of agricultural products play an important role in the economic development of both countries. To understand the current situation of agricultural exports of the two countries and formulate strategies to expand the marketing of agricultural products, this paper uses the UN Comtrade Database 2009-2018 on Chinese and Russian bilateral agricultural export sales and other trade data to calculate the (expansion margin) and (price margin) of agricultural exports, (quantity margin), to analyze the types, prices, and quantities of exported agricultural products. The results show that China exports to Russia mainly labor-intensive types of agricultural products such as processed agricultural and horticultural products, accounting for 87.46% of total agricultural exports on average. The increase in exports is mainly due to the continuous increase in the prices of exported agricultural products. Russia exports to China mainly land-intensive types of agricultural products such as animal products, grains, oilseeds and fat products, which accounted for an average of 79.07% of total agricultural exports. The increase in exports was mainly due to the continuous increase in types and quantities of agricultural products to develop the export potential of agricultural products and expand sales. In addition, China should expand the types and quantities of agricultural products exported, and Russia should increase the added value of agricultural products and raise the export prices of agricultural products.
