Technological perspectives of a balanced scorecard for business incubators: Evidence from South Africa
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.04
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #4, pp. 40-47
- Cited by
- 906 Views
-
374 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study was deemed relevant in the current epoch given the need for rebuilding enterprises that were devastated by the Covid-19 pandemic. To ensure economic restoration, particular interest in small business start-ups and incubators has become especially important. In addition, measurements for effectiveness are critical since, without them, progress cannot be ascertained. The aim of this study was to assess the balanced scorecard and its applicability to business incubators in the context of the present technological explosion. Specifically, the study assessed the technological dimension of the balanced scorecard with the particular intention of establishing how technological tools affect the balanced scorecard. The study was based on phenomenological interviews to provide data that were relevant to the study objectives. A thematic analysis of the data collected supported literature perspectives that technological tools and platforms such as social media, robotics, expert systems, online as well as web platforms strengthen and improve the measurement of both financial and non-financial criteria for measurement on the balanced scorecard. Technological tools were found to improve data collection, management, and analytics thereby improving the quality and credibility of balanced scorecard measurement. The study recommends the accelerated adoption of technological tools for use within the balanced scorecard among incubators. It also recommends that the government should support incubators in their technological adoption measures as this has the potential of increasing economic development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O43, H53, M38, E26, I38
-
References28
-
Tables1
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Network diagram for technological perspectives of the balanced scorecard
-
- Table 1. Excerpts from the interviews and codes
-
- Abdelmoneim, Z., & Fekry, M. A. (2021). Using managerial and market tools to measure the impact of acquisition operations on firm performance. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(1), 315-334.
- Akinniyi, O. K., Popoola, O. M. J., & Amadi, C. N. (2020). An Examination of Performance Measurement Prospects on the Fourth Industrial Revolution in the Nigerian Selected Public Sector Agencies. Indian-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4(3), 15-25.
- Al-Mubaraki, H., & Schrodl, H. (2011). Factors influencing the growth of African immigrant-owned business in selected craft markets in the Cape metropolitan area of South Africa. Journal of Enterprise Culture, 19(4), 435-452.
- Asoba, S. N. (2014). Factors influencing the growth of African immigrant-owned business in selected craft markets in the Cape metropolitan area of South Africa (Thesis). Cape Peninsula University of Technology.
- Benkova, E., Gallo, P., Balogova, B., & Nemec, J. (2020). Factors affecting the use of balanced scorecard in measuring company performance. Sustainability, 12(3), 1178.
- Bochenek, M. (2019). Balanced scorecard in strategic management process. Modern Management Review, 26(1), 7-16.
- Bongomin, O., Nganyi, E. O., Abswaidi, M. R., Hitiyise, E., & Tumusiime, G. (2020). Sustainable and dynamic competitiveness towards technological leadership of industry 4.0: Implications for East African community. Hindawi Journal of Engineering.
- Brathwaite, R. K. G. (2019). Social Media and Tourism Development in Grenada: A Phenomenological Study (Doctorate dissertation). Edinburgh Napier University.
- Buys, A. J., & Mbewana, P. N. (2007). Key success factors for business incubation in South Africa: the Godisa case study. South African Journal of Science, 103(9-10), 356-358.
- Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, A., & Kumar, V. (2021). Performance measurement for supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era: a balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(4), 789-807.
- Gastrow, M. (2020). Policy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in South Africa. Human Sciences Research Council.
- Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Sociology Press.
- Guillen, M. F. (2020). How business have successfully pivoted during the pandemic. Harvard Business Review.
- Hamdy, A. (2018). Balanced scorecard role in competitive advantage of Egyptian banking sector. The Business and Management Review, 9(3).
- Hewitt, L. M. M., & van Rensburg, L. J. J. (2020). The role of business incubators in creating sustainable small and medium enterprises. Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 12(1), 295-304.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 1-11.
- Kolb, S. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 3(1), 83-86.
- Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557-584.
- Lose, T. (2021). Institutionalised business incubation: A frontier for accelerating entrepreneurship in African countries. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(1), 1-10.
- Lose, T., Yakobi, K., & Kwahene, F. (2020). A grounded theory analysis for remodelling business incubation in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 26(4), 1-11.
- Lusk, E. J., Halperin, M., & Zhang, B. (2006). The Balanced Scorecard: Suggestions for Rebalancing. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4(2).
- Madsen, D. O., & Stenheim, T. (2014). Perceived problems associated with the implementation of the balanced scorecard: evidence from Scandinavia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 12(1-1).
- Mamedov, Z. F., Mineva, O. K., & Glinchevskiy, E. I. (2019). Innovative Approach to Human Capital Management under conditions of strong turbulence of Fourth Industrial Revolution. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 1517-1524.
- SEDA (Small Enterprise Development Agency). (2016). Incubation centres.
- Sedita, S.R., Apa, R., Bassetti, T., & Grandinetti, R. (2019). Incubation matters: Measuring the effect of business incubators on the innovation performance of start-ups. R&D Management, 49(4), 439-454.
- Shehada, R. Y., El Talla, A., Al Shobaki, M. J., & Abu-Naser, S. S. (2020). The reality of using the balanced scorecard in business incubators. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems (IJEAIS), 4(3), 67-95.
- Yuksel, P., & Yildirim, S. (2015). Theoretical frameworks, methods, and procedures for conducting phenomenological studies in educational settings. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 1-20.
- Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2010). Business research methods. Nashville, TN: South Western College Publishing.