Assessment of the development of innovation activities in the regions: Case of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.07
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #4, pp. 77-88
- Cited by
- 701 Views
-
129 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The development of innovation activities is of great importance on the path to achieving the goals of sustainable development. Success on this path is closely related to the presence of comparable information on the development of innovation activities at the regional level. The aim of the paper is to assess the development of innovation activities in the regions of Ukraine and identify differences in results. The study is performed using relative indicators for the assessment of the development of innovation activities in the regions of Ukraine. The indicators were averaged and normalized. To analyze how innovation activities change over time, the dynamic indices based on the geometric mean of the growth rate of the relative indicators were used. The obtained results have significant differences in the regions being assessed. Most regions have a heterogeneous development of innovation activities. At the same time, they are at the top and bottom of the rankings of the regions in different indicators of the development of innovation activities. Only Cherkasy and Zaporizhzhia oblasts are at the top of the rankings in at least 75% of indicators. However, in 2017‒2019, all indicators improved in at least 29% of regions. In addition, 75% of indicators improved in at least 54% of regions. Therefore, over time, most regions progressed in the development of innovation activities. Management decisions for the development of innovation activities should be complex for all regions and implemented primarily in the regions where there is no improvement over time.
Acknowledgments
The paper is prepared within the scientific research project “Sustainable development and resource security: from disruptive technologies to digital transformation of Ukrainian economy” (No. 0121U100470).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O30, O31, O32
-
References30
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Results of calculation of indicators II by regions of Ukraine, 2017‒2019
- Table 2. Results of calculation of indicators IP by regions of Ukraine, 2017‒2019
- Table 3. Results of calculation of indicators IE by regions of Ukraine, 2017‒2019
- Table 4. Results of calculation of indicators IS by regions of Ukraine, 2017‒2019
- Table 5. Average values of indicators II, IP, and for them, the values of indicators CI by regions of Ukraine, 2017–2019
- Table 6. Average values of indicators IE, IS, and for them, the values of indicators CI by regions of Ukraine, 2017–2019
- Table 7. Results of calculating dynamic indices iI and iP by regions of Ukraine, 2017–2019
- Table 8. Results of calculating dynamic indices iE and iS by regions of Ukraine, 2017–2019
-
- Arnkil, R., Jarvensivu. A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring Quadruple Helix: Outlining user-oriented innovation models (Working Papers 85/2010). University of Tampere.
- Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 131-140.
- Bloomberg Business. (2015). The Bloomberg Innovation Index.
- Boronos, V. H., Plikus, I. Y., Kubakh, T. H., & Fedchenko, K. A. (2020). Methodology for assessing the level of innovative development of the territories. Revista ESPACIOS, 41(07).
- Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2020). The Global Innovation Index.
- Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133-153.
- Economist Intelligence Unit. (2016). Social Innovation Index.
- European Commission. (2020). European Innovation Scoreboard 2020.
- Horobchenko, D., & Voronenko, V. (2018). Approaches to the formation of a theoretical model for the analysis of environmental and economic development. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(5), 1108-1119.
- Ilyash, O., Dzhadan, I., & Ostasz, G. (2018). The influence of the industry’s innovation activities indices on the industrial products’ revenue of Ukraine. Economics and Sociology, 11(4), 317-331.
- Indiana Business Research Center. (2016). Driving Regional Innovation. The Innovation Index 2.0.
- Ivanova, E., & Kordos, M. (2017). Competitiveness and innovation performance of regions in Slovak Republic. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 145-158.
- Ivanova, E., & Masarova, J. (2016). Assessment of innovation performance of Slovak regions. Journal of International Studies, 9(2), 207-218.
- Kartanaitė, I., Kovalov, B., Kubatko, O., & Krušinskas, R. (2021). Financial modeling trends for production companies in the context of Industry 4.0. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(1), 270-284.
- Kniazevych, A., Kyrylenko, V., & Golovkova, L. (2018). Innovation infrastructure of Ukraine: assessment of the effectiveness of the action and ways of improvement. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 208-218.
- Lopez-Claros, A., & Mata, Y.N. (2010). The Innovation Capacity Index: Factors, Policies, and Institutions Driving Country Innovation. In The Innovation for Development Report 2009–2010. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Nauwelaers, C., & Reid, A. (1995). Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential. Scientometrics, 34, 497-511.
- Nesta. (2021). The European Digital Social Innovation Index.
- Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 97-110.
- Sarkar, A. N. (2013). Promotion of Eco-Innovation to Leverage Sustainable Development of Eco-Industry and Green Growth. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(1), 171-224.
- Shkarupa, O. V. (2015). Management of region’s social and economic development environmental modernization. Economic Annals-XXI, 7-8(2), 57-60.
- Sotnyk, I. M., Volk, O. M., & Chortok, Y. V. (2013). Increasing ecological & economic efficiency of ICT introduction as an innovative direction in resource saving. Actual Problems of Economics, 147(9), 229-235.
- State statistics service of Ukraine. (2018). Scientific and innovative activities in Ukraine.
- State statistics service of Ukraine. (2019). Scientific and innovative activities in Ukraine.
- State statistics service of Ukraine. (2020). Scientific and innovative activities in Ukraine.
- Stejskal, J., Kuvíková, H., Meričková, B. M. (2018). Regional Innovation Systems Analysis and Evaluation: The Case of the Czech Republic. In J. Stejskal, P. Hajek & O. Hudec (Eds.), Knowledge Spillovers in Regional Innovation Systems (pp. 81-113). Cham: Springer.
- Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219.
- United Nations Statistics Division. (2001). Technology Achievement Index.
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
- Wu, M., Zhao, M., & Wu, Z. (2019). Evaluation of development level and economic contribution ratio of science and technology innovation in eastern China. Technology in Society, 59, 101194.