Positive impact of international companies on development of knowledge economy
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.08
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #2, pp. 81-89
- Cited by
- 3121 Views
-
506 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
In recent years, all economically developed countries of the world experience formation of knowledge economy as the highest stage of postindustrial economy development. International companies, basing their activity on accumulation of human capital according to the principles of innovativeness, scientific nature, continuity and progressiveness, play an important role in activation of this process. Owing to global nature of their activity it influences all spheres of human life in the world, improving it, as well as having an adverse impact (enhancement of poverty in some regions of the word, environment pollution, etc.). Achievement of these conditions of sustainable economic growth is possible just by the way of prevention of the adverse impact, which, among other things, depends on the active social position of the management of international companies. Therefore this paper is aimed at identification of priority focuses of socially responsible activity of international companies. This goal was achieved through generalization of basic program initiatives of the activity of three companies, leading in innovations (Apple, Samsung and IBM). Adoption of the above-mentioned initiatives by other companies of the world as guides while developing their own development strategy has to facilitate the growth of positive effects from enhancement of knowledge economy in the world.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F23, F62, I25, O34
-
References25
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Systematization of program initiatives of social responsibility of the companies, being innovative leaders of the world
- Table 2. Ranking of the companies by R&D investment in 2016
- Table 3. Priority areas of the international companies’ activity
-
- Apple. (2017). Education. Environment. Inclusion and Diversity. Privacy. Supplier Responsibility.
- Azam, M., Khan, S., Zainal, Z., Karuppiah, N., Khan, F. (2015). Foreign direct investment and human capital: evidence from developing countries. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(3), 155-162.
- BCG. (2016). The most innovative companies. An interactive guide.
- Bolgar, C. (2014). Interconnected risks in a digital economy.
- Brant, J. (2014). Protecting Trade Secrets To Stimulate Knowledge Flows.
- Cogburn, D. L. (2000). Globalization, knowledge, education and training. In the information age.
- Doorasamy, M. (2015). Identifying environmental and economic benefits of cleaner production in a manufacturing company: a case study of a paper and pulp manufacturing company in KwaZulu-Natal. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 12(1), 235-246.
- Duperrin, B. (2011). The problem with knowledge economy: it does not exist!
- Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., Zafeiriou, E., Partalidou, X. (2016). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(3), 171-182.
- Hanekom, D. (2013). Knowledge economies risk leaving the poor behind.
- Hutton, W. (2016). The future of work is the knowledge economy. Financial Times.
- IBM. (2017). Responsibility at IBM. Our Initiatives.
- Knowledge Economy Report (2016). Tracking progress. Powering prosperity. Northern Ireland’s Enterprise Bank. The Innovation Centre. Queen’s Road: Belfast. 30 р.
- Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Mathews, John A. (2013). The sixth technoeconomic paradigm. University Macquarie Graduate School of Management. Paper to be presented at the 35th DRUID Celebration Conference 2013, Barcelona, Spain, June 17-19.
- Muleya, D., Ngirande, H., Rachidi, M. P. (2016). Human resource practices as determinants of employees’ Intention to leave: a study from a selected South African institution. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(3), 403-409.
- OECD (1996). The knowledge-based economy. General distribution OCDE/GD(96)102. OECD, France. 46 р.
- Porat, M. U. (1977). The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce. OCLC 5184933.
- Radosevic, S., Stancova, K. C. (2015). Internationalising Smart Specialisation: Assessment and Issues in the Case of EU New Member States. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-31. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0339-3
- Samsung. (2016). Samsung Sustainability Report. GLOBAL HARMONY with. People, Society & Environment.
- Smith, M. K., Doyle, M. (2013). Globalization: theory and experience.
- Sullivan, N. (2016). Shifting toward the knowledge economy.
- The 2016 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard.
- Tsaparis, P. (2014). Canada must develop our knowledge economy. The Globe and Mail.
- Zakharova, О., Kratt, O. (2014). Economic Study and Risk Estime of the Investment in the Human Capital. Economics & Sociology, 7(2), 94-108. DOI: 10.14254/2071- 789X.2014/7-2/8