Investigating the relationship between tax culture and tax communication in Kazakhstan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.17
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #3, pp. 197-210
- Cited by
- 787 Views
-
375 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The study demonstrated the level of tax culture as the basis for tax compliance. In turn, the formation of a strong tax culture depended on certain factors. Therefore, there were statements that the degree of such a culture depends on the level of tax communication. To show this connection, this paper analyzed the content of text arrays and products of communicative correspondence by keywords income and asset declaration in the Google search system (content analysis). Results of the analysis demonstrated more than 160 news articles and numerous social media posts. Moreover, the study contains the analytics of social media powered by YouScan artificial intelligence platform. This paper also presents the analysis and results of the sociological survey, in which more than a thousand people participated in the two biggest cities in Kazakhstan. The data of the survey were analyzed by the software Statistica 10 – the statistical data analysis system. The survey showed low tax awareness of citizens, almost 72% of respondents did not know about the introduction of the declaration of income and welfare. The results obviously demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between investigated issues, and poor utilization of information and communications technology by the government. In this way, this paper explored the relationship between tax culture and tax communication, where the awareness of citizens could be a huge step in the formation of honest taxpayers and increase confidence in government institutions.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H26, O17
-
References29
-
Tables8
-
Figures9
-
- Figure 1. Content analysis of the IAD in Kazakhstan
- Figure 2. Mentions of the IAD in Kazakhstan
- Figure 3. Tonality of information perception
- Figure 4. Number of mentions
- Figure 5. Statistical result of the assessment of tax culture
- Figure 6. Statistical result of the level of knowledge of citizens about the importance of taxes for society
- Figure 7. The statistical result of measuring the level of awareness of citizens about the IAD
- Figure 8. Statistical analysis of information sources about the IAD
- Figure 9. Statistical degree of satisfaction of the information
-
- Table 1. Social media monitoring
- Table 2. What does the phrase “Fair taxes” mean to you?
- Table 3. Results of cross-analysis
- Table 4. Error matrix
- Table 5. Analysis of the level of awareness of citizens about the IAD
- Table 6. Analysis of information sources about the IAD
- Table 7. The level of satisfaction of citizens with the information
- Table 8. Error matrix
-
- Bennett, S. (1997). Knowledge of politics and sense of subjective political competence. AmericanPolitics Quarterly, 25(2), 230-240.
- Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538.
- Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. London: W. W. Norton, Incorporated.
- Canedo, E. D., Costa, R., Sausa, J. R. T., & Amvame-Nze, G. (2018). Best Practices Kits for the ICT Governance Process within the Secretariat of State-Owned Companies of Brazil and Regarding these Public Companies. Information, 9(6), 141.
- Carlisle, J., & Patton, R. (2013). Is Social Media Changing How We Understand Political Engagement? An Analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential Election. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 883-895.
- Cartiev, S., & Kureichick, V. (2016). A classification algorithm based on the principles of a random forest for solving the forecasting problem. Software Products and Systems, 2, 11-15.
- CONE. (2008). 2008 Business in Sosial Media Study.
- Ghoneim, S. (2019, April 2). Accuracy, Recall, Precision, F-Score & Specifity, which to optimize on? Based on your project, which performance metric to improve on. Towards data science.
- Grachev, G. V., & Melnick, I. K. (2002). Manipulirovanie lichnostju. Organizacija, sposoby i tehnologii informacionno- psihologicheskogo vozdejstvija [Personality manipulation. Organization, methods and technologies of information and psychological impact]. Moscow: Algorithm. (In Russian).
- Gurevich, P. S. (2004). Tretia volna, Alvin Toffler [The Third Wave by Alvin Toffler]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo ACT – AСТ Publishing. (In Russian).
- Hodgkinson, T. (2008, January 14). With friends like these... The Guardian.
- Huckfeldt , R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Jayawardane, D. (2015). Psychological Factors affect Tax Compliance-A Review paper. International Journal of Arts, 4(6), 131-141.
- Laktionov, A. (2004). Informacionnoe obshhestvo [Information society]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo ACT – AСТ Publishing. (In Russian).
- Levine, P. (2007). The Future of Democracy: Developing the Next Generation of American Citizens (Civil Society: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives). Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
- Lyotard, J. (1983). La condition postmoderne. Paris: Ed. de Minuit. (In French).
- Mangold, G., & Faulds, D. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52;4, 357-365.
- OECD. (2019). Tax Morale: What Drives People and Businesses to Pay Tax? Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2021). OECD work on taxation. OECD Publishing.
- Onu, D., & Oats, L. (2016). Paying tax is part of life: Social norms and social influence in tax communications. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organisation, 124, 29-42.
- Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315-338.
- Sekareva, I. (2011). Reklamnye i televizionnye mify kak forma manipuljacii soznaniem [Advertising and television myths as a form of manipulation of consciousness]. Nauchnyj potencial: raboty molodyh uchenyh – Scientific potential: the work of young scientists, 4, 241-244. (In Russian).
- Tang, G., & Lee, F. (2013). Facebook Use and Political Participation: The Impact of Exposure to Shared Political Information, Connections With Public Political Actors, and Network Structural Heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763-773.
- Torgler, B. (2004). Tax Morale, Trust and Corruption: Empirical Evidence from Transition Countries (Working Paper No. 2004-05). Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.
- Torgler, B., Schaffner, M., & Macintyre, A. (2007). Tax Compliance, Tax Morale and Governance Quality (Working Paper). Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.
- Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and Equality Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151-167.
- Zuniga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social Media Use for News and Individuals’ Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.