Enterprise value management based on the stakeholder approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.29
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #3, pp. 356-372
- Cited by
- 646 Views
-
298 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The need to ensure the growth of enterprise value in the context of strengthening intangible factors’ role in its formation and maintaining sustainable development of society requires the introduction of new value-oriented management models, taking into account the interests of a wide range of stakeholders.
The paper aimed to develop an approach to enterprise value management based on the stakeholder approach. Based on the presented conceptual vision of the enterprise as an SRPR system (stakeholders-resources-processes-results), a two-level system of SRPR value indicators for the main stakeholder groups has been developed, as well as an integral indicator of sustainable economic value added (EVA), which allows assessing the potential growth of enterprise value through a sustainable network of stakeholders. The possibility of using SRPR indicators in the process of planning activities has been substantiated: a model for maximizing EVA is formulated subject to a number of restrictions reflecting the standards of relationships with stakeholders, its transformation into a matrix of SRPR indicators.
The results of approbation of the proposed approach by questioning processing and wholesale trade enterprises in the B2B segment are presented, confirming the compliance of the proposed system of indicators with the interests of stakeholders and implementation at Europroject Ukraine LLC, which proved its practical value.
The need for further empirical studies of the dependence of EVA on changes in indicators of satisfaction of stakeholders’ interests is emphasized.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)М10, М21, G32
-
References30
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Enterprise as an SRPR system
- Figure 2. Pyramid of SRPR indicators
- Figure 3. Matrix of SRPR indicators
-
- Table 1. Financial interests of stakeholders and their contribution to the development of the enterprise
- Table 2. Personalized performance indicators that reflect the financial interests of stakeholders
- Table 3. Model of integrated assessment of EVA storage potential
- Table 4. Indicators of the enterprise resource and process state
- Table 5. Expectations of stakeholders from resource exchange and the problem of ensuring effective enterprise development
-
- Apitz, S. E., Fitzpatrick, A. G., McNally, A., Harrison, D., Coughlin, C., & Edwards, D. (2018). Stakeholder Value-Linked Sustainability Assessment: Evaluating Remedial Alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Portland, Oregon, USA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 14(1), 43-62.
- Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. (1996). How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495-502.
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implication. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
- Duru, O., Galvao, C. B., Mileski, J., Robles, L. T., & Gharehgozli, A. (2020). Developing a comprehensive approach to port performance assessment. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(4), 169-180.
- Ermak, S. A., & Lisnichenko, E. A. (2015). Maksymizatsiia vartosti pidpryiemstv v umovakh innovatsiinoi ekonomiky v konteksti steikkholderskoho pidkhodu [Maximizing the value of enterprises in the conditions of innovative economy in the context of the stakeholder approach]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective economy, 1. (In Ukrainian).
- Figge, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2000). What Is Stakeholder Value? Developing a Catchphrase into Benchmarking Tool. University of Luneburg and UNEP.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.
- Freeman, R. E., & Moutchnik, A. (2013). Stakeholder management and CSR: questions and answers. UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 21(1), 5-9.
- Hense, G. V. (2001). Business Performance Management Concept. Alpina Publisher.
- Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2007). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms: Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594-610.
- Ivashkovskaya, I. V. (2012). Steikkholderskyi podkhod k upravlenyiu, oryentyrovannomu na pryrashchenye stoymosty kompanyy [A stakeholder approach to management focused on the increment of company value]. Korporatyvnye fynansy – Corporate Finance, 6(1), 14-23. (In Russian).
- Ivashkovskaya, I. V. (2013). Fynansovye yzmerenyia korporatyvnykh stratehyi. Steikkholderskyi podkhod [Financial measurements of corporate strategies. A stakeholder approach]. INFRA-M. (In Russian).
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 71-79.
- Lankoski, L., Smith, N., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2016). Stakeholder Judgments of Value. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(2), 227-256.
- Machan, T. R. (2009). Stakeholder VS Shareholder Theory of the Ethics of Corporate Management. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 1(1), 12-20.
- McNair, C. J., Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. L. (1990). Do Financial and Nonfinancial Performance Measures Have to Agree? Management Accounting, 72(5), 28-39.
- Neely, A. (2007). Business Performance Measurement. Unifying Theory and Integrating Practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Pererva, P., Kobielieva, T., Tkасhovа, N., Tkachov, M., & Diachenko, T. (2021). Management of relations with enterprise stakeholders based on value approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 24-38.
- Popova, N. (2016). Marketynh steikkholderiv: teoretychni aspekty ta problemy vprovadzhennia [Stakeholder marketing: theoretical aspects and introduction problems]. Visnyk sotsialno-ekonomichnykh doslidzhen – Bulletin of Socio-Economic Research, 60(1), 169-178. (In Ukrainian).
- Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
- Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value: How to Reinvent Capitalism and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
- Post, J., Preston, L., & Sauter-Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. California: Stanford University Press.
- Ramírez, C., & Tarziján, J. (2018). Stakeholder value appropriation: The case of labor in the worldwide mining industry. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1496-1525.
- Rampersad, K. (2004). Unyversalnaia systema pokazatelei deiatelnosty [Universal Scorecard]. Alpina Business Books. (In Russian).
- Schwab, K. (2020). Why we need the “Davos Manifesto” for a better kind of capitalism. World Economic Forum.
- Smith, H. J. (2003). The Stakeholder VS Shareholder: Debate. Management Review, 44(4), 85-90.
- Stewart, G. B. (1991). The quest for value. N.Y.: Harper Business.
- Tantalo, C., & Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314-329.
- Younkins, E. W. (1997, April 1). Stakeholder as Shareholder. The Foundation for Economic Education.
- Zakharkin, O. O. (2014). Vartisno-oriientovane upravlinnia na osnovi steikkholderskoho pidkhodu v konteksti innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Value-based management on the basis of the stakeholder approach within the bounds of the innovation development of the enterprise]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Current Economic Problems, 10(160), 149-158. (In Ukrainian).