Multilevel transfer of innovations: Cognitive modeling to decision support in managing the economic growth
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.13
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #1, pp. 151-162
- Cited by
- 921 Views
-
277 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
An essential aspect of the country’s economic growth is the transfer of innovation, which is very important nowadays. The innovative projects can be implemented through it at the level of households, companies, institutions, and local communities. The transfer of innovations is intended to cause a cumulative effect and stimulate economic growth. It is important to determine the influence of different factors on this process and consider the feedbacks in the “enterprise-region-state” system, which will increase the level of control over the process. The paper aims to find scientific instruments for managing the multilevel transfer of innovations, representing the connections between factors that act as catalysts/inhibitors of that process. The proposed methodology uses systems analysis, indicative analysis, and cognitive modeling (Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCM)). Based on the study results, a cognitive model was formed based on identifying the “strength of impact” of connections between elements that determine the level of influence of the micro- and macro-environment factors of the innovation multilevel transfer. From a practical point of view, this allows obtaining forecasts of its behavior under different management actions. To implement the research results, it is necessary to determine management tools that will allow stakeholders in the system “enterprise-region-state” to make a transfer of innovations most effective. It demonstrates the need for further research in this area and assessing the potential consequences of management decisions for economic growth.
Acknowledgment
This research was funded by a grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine “Modelling the Transfer of Eco-Innovations in the Enterprise-Region-State System: Impact on Ukraine’s Economic Growth and Security” (No. 0119U100364).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O21, O32, P11, Q50
-
References41
-
Tables2
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Multilevel and intersectoral transfer of innovations (authors’ view)
- Figure 2. Results of the 1-14 iterations
- Figure 3. Cognitive map of multilevel transfer of innovations in Ukraine
-
- Table 1. The share of financing of R&D expenses in the total volume of R&D expenses by sector
- Table 2. The values according to the “strength of impact”
-
- Axelrod, R. (1976). The analysis of cognitive maps. In R. Axelrod (Ed.), Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites (pp. 55-73). Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
- Boronos, V. G., Shkarupa, O. V., Demchyshak, N. B., Sineviciene, L., & Kubakh, T. G. (2020). Strategic orientation of innovative activity regulation: Ukraine and EU integration process. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 1(32), 307-318.
- Chen, Z., Yan, Y., Hao, J., & Wang, G. (2015). Fuzzy Cognitive Maps-Based Method for Modelling Tacit Knowledge of Scheme Evaluation. In Proceedings 2015 International Symposium on Material, Energy and Environment Engineering (pp. 570-573).
- Chukhray, N. I. (2017). Barriers and benefits of university-business cooperation in Ukrainian innovation sector. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University, 25(2), 21-24. (In Ukrainian).
- European Commission (EC). (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018.
- Eurostat. (2018). Research and development expenditures.
- Eurostat. (2020). Waste generated by households by year and waste category.
- Fonshteyn, N. M. (1995). Commercialization of technologies. World experience for Russian regions. Moscow: Moscow News. (In Russian).
- Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
- Geels, F. W. (2011). The multilevel perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40.
- Groumpos, P., & Anninou, A. (2017). A critical overview of modeling methods and decision support systems for complex dynamic systems. Annals of Faculty Engineering Hunedoara, 15(3), 17-26.
- Hens, L., Karintseva, O., Kharchenko, M., & Matsenko, O. (2018a). The States Structural Policy Innovations Influenced by the Ecological Transformations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 290-301.
- Hens, L., Karintseva, O., Shkarupa, O., & Kharchenko, M. (2018b). Integral assessment of national economy sustainable development. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 21(5/6), 306–318.
- Illiashenko, S., Shypulina, Yu., Gryshchenko, O., & Illiashenko, N. (2019). The information support system’s formation of marketing innovative decisions in Ukrainian companies. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3C), 137-143.
- Jordan, J. F. (2014). Innovation, Commercialization, and the Successful Startup (1st ed.). CRC Press.
- Kaiser, R., & Prange-Gstöhl, H. (2013). Multilevel Systems of Innovation. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY.
- Kanishchenko, O., Chupryna, N., Bobkova, A., Andrуeуeva, N., & Kozlovtseva, V. (2019). Problems of Commercialization of Environmental Innovations at Industrial Enterprises. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 11216-11220.
- Karaoulanis, A. (2018). Strategic Transformation and Innovation towards Blue Ocean Creation in a Changing Corporate Reality. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(2), 49-55.
- Kasztelnik, K., & Gaines, V. W. (2019). Correlational Study: Internal Auditing and Management Control Environment Innovation within Public Sector in the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 3(4), 5-15.
- Khan, Y. H. (2018). The Effectiveness of Entrepreneurial Activities for Economic Development: A Route to Innovation and Job Generation. Socio-Economic Challenges, 2(2), 32-40.
- Kokkinos, K., Lakioti, E., Papageorgiou, E., Moustakas, K., & Karayannis, V. (2018). Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Modeling of Social Acceptance to Overcome Uncertainties in Establishing Waste Biorefinery Facilities. Frontiers in Energy Research, 6, 112.
- Lyashenko, O. M. (2009). Metody ta modeli komertsializatsiyi transferu tekhnolohiy [Methods and models of commercialization of technology transfer] (Doctoral Thesis). (In Ukrainian).
- Matsenko, O., & Ovcharenko, D. (2013). The Quality of Energy Resources Controlling as a Part of Effective Enterprise Management. Economic Annals-XXI, 9-10(1), 75-78.
- Medani P. Bhandari. (2019). Sustainable Development: Is This Paradigm the Remedy of All Challenges? Does its Goals Capture the Essence of Real Development and Sustainability? With Reference to Discourses, Creativeness, Boundaries and Institutional Architecture. Socio-Economic Challenges, 3(4), 97-128.
- Melnyk, L. G., & Kubatko, O. V. (2013). The EU experience in economic systems adaptation to resource fluctuations through stimulation of green innovations. Actual Problems of Economics, 150(12), 36-42.
- Melnyk, Yu. M., Sager, L. Yu., & Sygyda, L. O. (2019). Teoretychni aspekty formuvannia stratehii komertsializatsii innovatsiinoi produktsii [Theoretical aspects of strategies forming for innovative products commercialization]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni O.O. Mechnykova – Bulletin of Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University, 1(74), 69-73. (In Ukrainian).
- Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them (Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008). Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola, Florida.
- Papageorgiou, E. I., Parsopoulos, K. E., Stylios, C., Groumpos, P. P., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2005). Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Learning Using Particle Swarm Optimization. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 25(1), 95-121.
- Peresadko, G. O., Kovalenko, E. V., & Kulyk, L. A. (2014). Mechanisms of investing into innovative projects of enterprises. Actual Problems of Economics, 160(1), 184-187.
- Peshko, A. V., & Nazarenko, A. V. (2006). Innovative activities as a necessary component of investments. Ekonomika promyslovosti –Industrial economics, 2, 14-18. (In Ukrainian).
- Porter, M. (1993). Mezhdunarodnaya konkurentsiya [International competition] (896 p.). Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).
- Shkarupa, O., & Shkarupa, I. (2019). Regulation the multilevel transfer system of innovations for sustainable development. Paper presented at the 60th International Scientific Conference of Riga Technical University “Scientific Conference on Economics and Entrepreneurship SCEE’2019”. Book of Abstracts (54 p.). Riga: RTU Press.
- Sineviciene, L., Shkarupa, О., & Sysoyeva, L. (2018). Socio-economic and Political Channels for Promoting Innovation as a Basis for Increasing the Economic Security of the State: Comparison of Ukraine and the Countries of the European Union. Socio-Economic Challenges, 2(2), 81-93.
- Srholec, M. (2010). A Multilevel Approach to Geography of Innovation. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1207-1220.
- Stach, W., Kurgan, L. A., & Pedrycz, W. (2010). Expert-based and Computational Methods for Developing Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. In M. Glykas (Ed.), Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: Advances in Theory, Methodologies and Applications. Springer.
- Stylios, C., & Groumpos, P. P. (1999). Mathematical Formulation of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. In Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED99) (pp. 2251-2261). Haifa, Israel.
- Stylios, C., Georgopoulos, V. C., & Groumpos, P. P. (1997). The Use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps in Modeling Systems. Proceedings of the 5th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Systems. Paphos, Cyprus.
- Vasilyeva, T., Kuzmenko, O., & Bozhenko, V. (2019). Assessment of the dynamics of bifurcation transformations in the economy. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Monitoring, Modeling & Management of Emergent Economy (M3E2 2019) (pp. 134-146).
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2002). Pro innovatsiinu diialnist [On Innovation Activity]. The Law of Ukraine No. 40-IV of July 4, 2002.
- Voronenko, V., Kovalov, B., Horobchenko, D., & Hrycenko, P. (2017). The effects of the management of natural energy resources in the European Union. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 8(7), 1410-1419.
- Zakutniaia, A., & Hayriyan, A. (2017). Transparency as competitive advantage of innovation driven companies. Business Ethics and Leadership, 1(1), 46-54.