A cognitive model for managing the national innovation system parameters based on international comparisons (the case of the EU countries)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.13
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 153-162
- Cited by
- 941 Views
-
129 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
To carry out a comparative analysis of the EU countries’ national innovation systems (NIS), a feature vector has been compiled, covering three modules, namely, science, education, and innovation. The feature vector is a valid multidimensional data set of sixteen official statistics indices and two sub-indices of the Global Innovation Index. The development of a cognitive model for managing the NIS parameters required a preliminary three-stage empirical study to determine its elements. In the first stage, cluster analysis was performed (the k-means, metric – Euclidean distance algorithm was used). As a result, the EU countries were divided into four clusters (following multidimensional scaling estimates). In the second stage, a classification analysis (using decision trees) was carried out, which allowed determining three parameters that distinguish clusters (or classes) optimally. These parameters are recognized as important ones in terms of positioning the countries in the general ranking; that is, they can be considered as a priority for the NIS development and improving the countries’ positions in international comparisons. In the third stage, based on the authors’ approach, the significance (information content) of each key parameter is estimated. As a result, a cognitive model was compiled, taking into account the parameter significance. The model can be used in managing the NIS parameters, seeking to increase the system performance and improve the international position of a specific country. The model can also be used by partner countries, for example, Ukraine, as it demonstrates the landscape of EU innovative development and outlines the directions for priority development of NIS towards the European progress.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C38, F00, O11, O57
-
References27
-
Tables2
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Cognitive model for managing the NIS parameters of the EU countries
-
- Table 1. A feature vector of the EU countries’ NISs, structuring its parameters according to the three main modules
- Table 2. The resulting country clusters according to the NIS parameters
-
- Carvalho, J. P., & Tomé, J. (2009). Rule Based Fuzzy Cognitive Maps in Socio-Economic Systems (Proceedings of the Joint 2009 International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress and 2009 European Society of Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference (1821–1826)). Lisbon.
- Casadella, V., & Uzunidis, D. (2017). National Innovation Systems of the South, Innovation and Economic Development Policies: A Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Innovation Economics, 2(23), 137-157.
- Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23.
- Etzkowitz, H. (2011). The Triple Helix: University–industry–government innovation in action. Papers in Regional Science, 90(2), 441-442.
- Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London, New York: Frances Printer Publishers.
- Ginis, L. A. (2015). The Use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for the Analysis of Structure of Social and Economic System for the Purpose of Its Sustainable Development. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 113-118.
- Gupta, Shas., & Gupta, Shal. (2017). Modeling Economic System Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(2), 1472-1486.
- Janger, J., Schubert, T., Andries, P., Rammer, Ch., & Hoskens, M. (2017). The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes? Research Policy, 46(1), 30-42.
- Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(1), 65-75.
- Kozmenko, O., & Kuzmenko, O. (2017). Cognitive modeling of reinsurance flows on the global reinsurance market. Geopolitics under Globalization, 1(1), 5-11.
- Lassnigg, L., Hartl, J., Unger, M., & Schwarzenbacher, I. (2017). Higher Education Institutions and Knowledge Triangle: Improving the Interaction between Education, Research and Innovation HIS (Sociological Series. Working Paper, 118).
- Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of innovations and interactive learning. London and New York: Pinter.
- Mehta, S. (2018). National Innovation System of India: An Empirical Analysis. Millennial Asia, 9(2), 203-224.
- Nelson, R. (1993). National System of Innovation: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press.
- Papageorgiou, E. I., & Salmeron, J. L. (2013). A Review of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Research During the Last Decade. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 21(1), 66-79.
- Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, and How They Might Be Measured and Compared. Journal Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(1), 77-95.
- Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994). The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovation Systems. STI Review, 14, 56-68.
- Pegkas, P., Staikouras, Ch., & Tsamadias, C. (2019). Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? Evidence from the European Union countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(5), 1005-1025.
- Penn, A. S., Knight, Ch. J. K., Lloyd, D. J. B., Avitabile, D., Kok, K., Schiller, F., Woodward, A., Druckman, A., & Basson, L. (2013). Participatory Development and Analysis of a Fuzzy Cognitive Map of the Establishment of a Bio-Based Economy in the Humber Region. PLoS One, 8(11).
- Petrunia, Y., Chentsov, V., Życzyński, N., & Petrunia, V. (2019). Marketing environment and marketing management of universities in Ukraine: national and regional dominants. Innovative Marketing, 15(1), 1-12.
- Radosevic, S., & Petraite, M. (2006). The Role of Higher Education in National Innovation Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher education in national innovation, Chapter 9, 35-60.
- Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262.
- Smol, M., & Kulczycka, J. (2019). Towards innovations development in the European raw material sector by evolution of the knowledge triangle. Resources Policy, 62, 453-462.
- Unger, M., & Polt, W. (2017). The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation – A Conceptual Discussion. Foresight and STI Governance. Journal of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, 11(2), 10-26.
- Vidal, R., Salmeron, J. L., Mena, A., & Chulvi, V. (2015). Fuzzy Cognitive Map-based selection of TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) trends for eco-innovation of ceramic industry products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 202-214.
- Yatsukh, O. (2018). Cognitive modeling of factors of influence on the processes of formation and reproduction of fixed assets of agricultural enterprises. Development Management, 16(4), 73-87.