Analyzing the quality disclosure of Global Reporting Initiative G4 sustainability report in Indonesian companies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.37
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 453-468
- Cited by
- 1049 Views
-
188 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The establishment of a company cannot be separated from its environmental and social factors. Sustainability reports start from those applied to current companies because there are forms of corporate accountability to stakeholders and community considerations of the company to provide social responsibility. This study finds out and empirically proves that there are differences in each Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 indicator in the company’s sustainability report in each industry classification. The authors investigate the dominant indicators in each industry classification based on sustainability reports. The data are obtained from 28 GRI G4-based company sustainability reports in 2016 and 2017. The analytical method in the study is the K-means clustering analysis. The results of study indicate the differences in GRI G4 in 2016 and 2017. The researchers find out that the dominant indicator expressed in the financial industry is an economic indicator. Meanwhile, in the mining, transportation and infrastructure industries, basic and chemical industries etc. the dominant indicators to be disclosed are environmental indicators. This research provides a theoretical basis for sustainability and environmental reporting, particularly in the context of developing countries. It is expected that this study should also inform business practitioners as well as policymakers vis-à-vis sustainability reporting in practice.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, Q01
-
References39
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sample companies
- Table 2. ANOVA/F-test results
- Table 3. Cluster membership
- Table 4. Final cluster
-
- Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223-250.
- Afzala, F., Lima, B., & Prasada, D. (2017). An investigation of corporate approaches to sustainability in the construction industry. Procedia Engineering, 180, 202-210.
- Anke, F. M. (2009). Analisis Penerapan Sustainability Repor Berdasarkan Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).
- Aziz, A. (2014, December). Analisis Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Terhadap Kualitas Pengungkapan. Jurnal Audit dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tanjungpura, 3, 65-84.
- Braam, G., & Peeters, A. R. (2018). Corporate Sustainability Performance and Assurance on Sustainability Reports: Diffusion of Accounting Practices in the Realm of Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 164-181.
- Damanik, L. Y. (2017, August). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan dan Karakteristik Perusahaan terhadap Kuantitas dan Kualitas Pengungkapan Sustainability Report di Indonesia Periode 2013–2015. PROFITA, 10, 231-232.
- Deegan, C. (2002). The Legitimizing Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311.
- Edum-Fotwe, F. T., & Price, A. D. F. (2009). A social ontology for appraising sustainability of construction projects and developments. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 313-322.
- Fatchan, I. N. (2016). Pengaruh good corporate govermance pada hubungan antara sustainability report dan nilai perusahaan. Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 1, 25.
- Fernandez-Sanchez, G. F., & Rodrigues-Lopez, F. (2010). A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management – Application to infrastructure projects in Spain. Ecological Indicators, 10(6), 1193-1201.
- GRI. (2013). Pedoman Pelaporan Keberlanjutan. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Europe: Global Reporting Initiative.
- Iman, N. (2018, August). Memahami dinamika tekfin di Indonesia (Understanding the dynamics of fintech in Indonesia) (Working Paper).
- Iman, N. (2019). Revisiting sustainability with a business management lens. The Journal of Record, 12(1), 34-39.
- John, L. C. (2017, March). Sustainability Reporting: Going Beyond Compliance.
- Johnelkington. (n.d.). Triple Bottom Line.
- Jusmarni, J. (2016). Pengaruh Sustainability Reporting Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dari sisi Market Value Ratios dan Asset Management Ratio. Sorot, 11(1), 29-45.
- Kia. (n.d.). Manfaat Sustainability Report bagi Perusahaan.
- Kurniawan, P. S. (2018). Analisis Penyusunan dan Pelaksanaan Program Audit Laporan Keberlanjutan Perusahaan. ASET, 10(1).
- Kustiani, N. A. (2017). Penenerapan elemen-elemen integreated reporting pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia.
- Lako, A. (2011). Dekonstruksi CSR and Reformasi Paradigma Bisnis and Akuntansi. Erlangga, Jakarta.
- Lankoski, L. (2008). Corporate responbility activities and economic performance: a theory of why and how they are connected. Bussiness Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 536-547.
- Li, H., Zhang, X., Ng, S. T., & Skitmore, M. (2017). Quantifying Stakeholder Influence in Decision/Evaluations relating to Sustainable Construction in China – A Delphi Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 160-170.
- Marwati, C. P., & Yulianti, Y. (2015). Analisis Pengungkapan Sustanibility Report pada Perusahaan Non-Keuangan Tahun 2009–2013. Dinamika Akuntansi, 167-181.
- Neliana, T. (2018, April). Pengungkapan sukarela laporan tahunan dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7, 80.
- Nugroho, F. A. (2009). Analisis Atas Narrative Text Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responbility dalam Sustainability Report PT. Aneka Tambang, Tbk. Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
- Nurkhalis, N. N., Arief, H., & Sunarminto, T. (2018, September). Analisis Stakeholders dalam Pengembangan Ekowisata di Hutan Adat Ammatoa Kajang Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Pariwisata, 5, 109.
- Ok, Saham. (2019). 9 Sektor BEI beserta daftar subsektornya.
- Puspitandari, J., & Septiani, A. (2017). Pengaruh Sustainability Report Disclousure Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan. Journal of Accounting, 1-12.
- Rahmah, Y., Rahmawati, V., & Natariasari, R. (2018). Pengaruh pengungkapan sustainability resport terhadap kinerja keuangan pada perusahaan go public di Indonesia dan Thailand. Journal online Mahasiswa, 1(1).
- Rahman, A. R. (2017, October). Influence of financial performance and characteristics corporate on disclosure sustainability report in the listing corporate on Indonesia Stock. JOM Fekon, 4, 4883.
- Riza, W. Y. (2017). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Struktur Modal, dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Pengungkapan Sustainability Reporting. Akuntansi, 5(2).
- Roca, L. C., & Searcy, C. (2012). An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 103-118.
- Safitri, N. F. (2013). Analisa pelaporan pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) berdasarkan pedoman global reporting intiatives (GRI).
- Saputra, A. R. (2018, January-June). Pengaruh corporate social responsibility dan profitabilitas terhadap nilai perusahaan sektor industri dasar dan kimia yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia. JOM FISIP, 5, 3-4.
- Sejati, B. P., & Prastiwi, A. (2015). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Sustainability Report. Journal of Accounting, 1-12.
- Septian, M. Y. (2013, March 13). Sustainability Reporting.
- Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
- Supadi, Y. M., & Sudana, I. P. (2018). Pengaruh kinerja lingkungan dan corporate social responsibility disclosure pada kinerja keuangan perusahaan sektor pertambangan. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 7(4), 1170.
- Tarigan, J., & Semuel, H. (2014). Pengungkapan Sustainability Report dan Kinerja Keuangan. Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 88-101.