Promotion of Ukraine’s export to China: priorities and institutional framework
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.40
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #3, pp. 508-520
- Cited by
-
Funding dataFunder name: Kyiv National University of Trade and EconomicsFunder identifier: 352170250163968Award numbers: 0117U007173
- 736 Views
-
119 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In the context of neo-protectionism and in terms of WTO membership, regulatory mechanisms for promoting the national producer and country’s external expansion require an institutional basis. This paper primarily aims to explore the resource and institutional component in promoting Ukraine’s exports to Chinese market and to identify the level of Ukraine’s export promotion system effectiveness based on combinatorial approach, which includes the calculation of quantitative indicators of foreign trade in the form of international production and marketing cooperation and estimation of qualitative parameters of export promotion effectiveness. The empirical findings indicate following: high dynamism of increasing mutual trade volume; enlargement of trade flows asymmetry caused by the negative trade balance of Ukrainian economy; limited list of commodity groups of Ukrainian exports in mutual trade with China with stable relative advantages; dominance of low-value-added commodities among export priority groups; absence of beneficial effect of such a factor as “long-term partnerships” in the mutual trade flow. The paper reveals that national export promotion system in Ukraine can be characterized by low efficiency and strong potential for growth. The authors emphasize the importance of intensifying the projects and mechanisms of financial and investment support for exporters with increasing the level of their innovative orientation. Prospects for further research in this area are as follows: the assessment of macroeconomic effects from the introduction of export promotion tools for the national economy of countries of origin of goods and importing countries; detection of anticompetitive risks in the implementation of selective support programs for exporters.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F13, F14, F55
-
References28
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Output aggregate data of Ukraine’s foreign trade with China in 2007–2017
- Table 2. Indices of relative advantages in the mutual trade between Ukraine and China by product groups in 2011–2017
- Table 3. Priority commodity groups of Ukraine’s exports for sale in the Asian market by the criterion of relative advantages
- Table 4. Integral index of regulatory effectiveness of promoting Ukraine’s export to the PRC in 2008 and 2017
- Table 5. Matrix of the structure of Ukraine’s exports to the PRC in 2011–2017 based on ABC, XYZ analysis
- Table 6. Matrix of the structure of Ukraine’s import from the PRC in 2011–2017 based on ABC, XYZ analysis
- Table 7. Comparative analysis of export efficiency of certain commodity groups of Ukraine in the EU, Asia and other regions of the world in 2012–2017
-
- Bernini, M., Du, J., & Love, J. H. (2016). Explaining intermittent exporting: Exit and conditional re-entry in export markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(9), 1058-1076.
- Bhagwati, J. (1958). International trade and economic expansion. American Economic Review, 48(5), 941-953.
- Biesebroeck, J. V., Konings, J., & Martincus, C. V. (2016). Did export promotion help firms weather the crisis? Economic Policy, 31(88), 653-702.
- Boso, N., Adeola, O., Danso, A., & Assadinia, S. (2019). The effect of export marketing capabilities on export performance: Moderating role of dysfunctional competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 137-145.
- Broocks, A., & Biesebroeck, J. V. (2017). The impact of export promotion on export market entry. Journal of International Economics, 107, 19-33.
- Chen, J., Sousa, C. M. P., & He, X. (2019). Export market re-entry: Time-out period and price/quality dynamisms. Journal of world business, 54(2), 154-168.
- Cruz, M. (2014). Do Export Promotion Agencies Promote New Exporters? (IDB Working Paper Series No IDB-WP-508). Inter-American Development Bank.
- Dekhtyar, N., Mazorenko, O., & Serpukhov, M. (2018). Estimation of Ukraine’s foreign trade structure in order to determine the areas of export potential. Innovative Marketing, 14(3), 30-43.
- Francis, J., & Collins‐Dodd, C. (2004). Impact of export promotion programs on firm competencies, strategies and performance. International Marketing Review, 21(4/5), 474-495.
- Geyec, V. M., Shinkaruk, L. V., Artomova, T. I., Bobuh, I. M., Burlaka, V. G. et al. (2011). Структурні зміни та економічний розвиток України [Strukturni zmini ta ekonomichnyi rozvitok Ukrainy]. Kyiv: Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the NAS of Ukraine.
- Gil, S., Llorca, R., & Serrano, J. A. M. (2008). Measuring the Impact of Regional Export Promotion: The Spanish Case. Papers in Regional Science, 87(1), 139-146.
- Haiduk, A. (2017). Особенности маркетинга в Китае [Osobennosti marketinga v Kitae].
- Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy (2017). Експортна стратегія України: дорожня карта стратегічного розвитку торгівлі 2017–2021 [Eksportna stratehiia Ukrainy: dorozhnia karta strategichnoho rozvytku torhivli 2017–2021].
- Kobuta, I., Kruvonis, K., & Akbarov, A. (2018). Review of Agro-food Trade Policy in the Post-Soviet Countries in 2016–2017. FAO.
- Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M., & Payton, L. (2010). Export promotion agencies: Do they work? Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 257-265.
- Leonidou, L. C., Palihawadana, D., & Theodosiou, M. (2011). National Export-Promotion Programs as Drivers of Organizational Resources and Capabilities: Effects on Strategy, Competitive Advantage, and Performance. Journal of International Marketing, 19(2), 1-29.
- Mazaraki, A. A., & Dubovyk, T. V. (2015). Інтернет-маркетингові комунікації в програмах е-лояльності споживачів [Internet-marketinhovi komunikatcii v programakh e-loyalnosti spozhyvachiv]. Aktualni problemi ekonomiki, 174(12), 423-429.
- Ministerstvo Ahrarnoi Polityky ta Prodovolstva Ukrainy (2015). Єдина комплексна стратегія та план дій розвитку сільського господарства та сільських територій в Україні на 2015–2020 роки [Yedyna kompleksna stratehiia ta plan dii rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva ta silskykh terytoriy v Ukraini na 2015–2020].
- Naisbitt, J. (1994). Global Paradox: The Bigger World Economy the More Powerful Its Smallest Players. New York: W. Morrow.
- Ostashko, T., & Olefir, V. (2019). Перспективи вільної торгівлі з Китаєм: розвиток вітчизняного експорту і ризики імпортозалежності [Perspektyvy vilnoi torhivli z Kytaiem: rozvytok vitchyznianoho eksportu i ryzyky importozalezhnosti]. Economy and Forecasting, 1, 128-155.
- Prud’homme, D., & Zedtwitz, M. (2019). Managing “forced” technology transfer in emerging markets: The case of China. Journal of International Management, 25(3), 960-979.
- Richter, S. (2015). Export Promotion Framework of the Czech Republic. Central European Business Review, 4(1), 37-49.
- Schminke, A., & Biesebroeck, J. (2012). Smoothing out the bumpy road to export success: Evaluating export promotion activities in Belgium. In workshop “Aid for Trade: What Have we Learnt? Which way Ahead?”. International Conference Centre, Geneva.
- Shapenkova, D. V. (2014). Особенности маркетинга различных стран [Osobennosti marketinga razlichnyh stran]. Molodoy uchenyy, 12(71), 202-205.
- Smallridge, D. (2006). The Role of State-Backed Export Credit in Export Promotion. In World Bank’s Seminar on Policies to promote export growth and diversification.
- The World Bank. (2019). Global Economic Prospects.
- Wei, T., & Bu, M. (2019). Global Networks and Innovation in China - International Linkages and Indigenous Efforts. International Studies of Management & Organization, 49(2), 121-125.
- Wilkinson, T., & Brouthers, L. E. (2006). Trade promotion and SME export performance. International Business Review, 15(3), 233-252.