Improvement of the water resources management system at the territorial level
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.34
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #3, pp. 421-437
- Cited by
- 704 Views
-
84 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The article is devoted to the improvement of the water resources management system at the territorial level. The article covers problems in different countries of the world, which are described in the water supply with an increase in the population of a harsh climate. Today, the existing trend shows that about two-thirds of forests and wetlands have been lost or degraded since the early 20th century, the soil was destroyed and deteriorated in quality. These trends predict floods and droughts, which in turn affects our ability to adapt to climate change. The analysis of the literature on the peculiarities of determining the main elements of influence on the use of water resources in the world is carried out. The article used a dialectical method, which is due to the need for analysis and generalization of certain aspects of scientific knowledge that analyze the availability of water resources in different parts of the world. Structural-functional analysis of the principle of systematic study of phenomena and processes is applied. With the help of the system-analytical method, the maintenance of the territories (areas) of Ukraine by local water resources is calculated, on average, per year, this m3 per person, based on the resource of surface water, as well as the exploration and catchment of groundwater. The decomposition of criteria for assessing the effectiveness of water resources management at the territorial level based on the integral territorial index is developed. According to the numerical value of the integrated territorial efficiency index, it is proposed to combine regions into homogeneous groups depending on the proximity or distance from the average value of this index.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q25, Q28
-
References34
-
Tables6
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Resources of fresh water in different countries on average per person, м3
- Figure 2. Provision of the population of Ukraine regionswith local water resources in the average water year, thousands, m3 per person
- Figure 3. Conceptual scheme of the mechanism of the state policy of water sector development based on the concept of mobilization water use in the process of decentralization
- Figure A1. Algorithm for assessing the effectiveness of the water resources management system at the territorial level
-
- Table 1. The dynamics of water use in the world by years
- Table 2. Criteria for determining the trend of changing the efficiency of the water resources management system at the territorial level
- Table 3. The matrix of the choice of the basic guidelines for the water resources management system at the territorial level
- Table A1. Top 20 countries with the highest level of water resources exploitation
- Table A2. Rating of investment-attractive countries in the context of the relevance of water production/water supply
- Table A3. The dynamics of the integrated territorial index of the efficiency of the water resources management system at the territorial level by the investment criterion, 2015–2017
-
- Alcamo, J., Doll, P., Kaspar, F., & Siebert, S. (1997). Global Change and Global Scenarios of water Use and Availability. An Application of WaterGAP 1.0. University of Kassel, CESR.
- Alcamo, J., Henrichs, T., & Rosch, T. (2000). World Water in 2025: Global Modeling and Scenario Analysis. In Rijsberman (Ed.), World Water Scenarios Analyses. World Water Council, Marseille.
- Andriushchenko, K., Lavruk, V., Uliganets, S., Kovtun, V., & Matviienko, H. (2019). Reputation risk management companies based on competence approach. TEM Journal, 8(2), 516-524.
- Andriushchenko, K., Stefanyshyn, D., Sahaidak, М., Tepliuk, М., Buchynska, O., Rozmetova, E., Marusei, T., Levchenko, I., Smyrnova, I., & Zhytomyrska, T. (2018). Process of resources provision management of the enterprise’s activity with consideration of gender factor. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(3), 6-19.
- Andriushchenko, K., Rudyk, V., Riabchenko, O., Kachynska, M., Marynenko, N., Shergina, L., Kovtun, V., Tepliuk, М., Zhemba, A., & Kuchai, O. (2019). Processes of managing information infrastructure of a digital enterprise in the framework of the “Industry 4.0” concept. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1/3(97), 60-72.
- Bil, H., Tretiak, M., & Krainyk, O. (2009). Механізм державного управління туристичної галузі (регіональний аспект) [Mekhanizm derzhavnoho upravlinnia turystychnoi haluzi (rehionalnyi aspekt)]. NADU, Kyiv, Ukraine.
- Cosgrove, W. J., & Rijsberman, F. R. (2000a). World Water Vision: Making Water Everybody’s Business (Earthscan Publications, London).
- Cosgrove, W. J., & Rijsberman, F. R. (2000b). Challenge for the 21st Century: Making Water Everybody’s Business. Sustainable Development International, 2, 149-156.
- EC (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJ L327, 22.12.2000.
- Falkenmark, M., Lundquist, J., & Widstrand, C. (1989). Macro-scale water scarcity requires micro-scale approaches: Aspects of vulnerability in semi-arid development. Natural Resources Forum, 13(4), 258-267.
- Global Environment Facility (GEF) (2004). From Ridge to Reef. Water, Environment and Community Security. GEF Action on Transboundary Water Resources.
- Holian, V. A. (2009). Інституціональне середовище водокористування: сучасний стан та механізми вдосконалення [Instytutsionalne seredovyshche vodokorystuvannia: suchasnyi stan ta mekhanizmy vdoskonalennia]. Lutsk: Tverdynia.
- Ivanova, T. V. (2011). Державне управління сталим економічним розвитком України та її регіонів у системі раціонального природокористування [Derzhavne upravlinnia stalym ekolohichnym rozvytkom Ukrainy ta yii rehioniv u systemi ratsionalnoho pryrodokorystuvannia]. Donetsk: Yuho-Vostok.
- Meigh, J. R., Giacomello, A. M., Fediw, T., Lawrence, P., Samad, M., Mlote, S., Hutton, C., Allan, J. A., Schulze, R. E., Dlamini, D. J. M., Cosgrove, W. J., Delli Priscoli, J., Gleick, P., Smout, I., Cobbing, J., Calow, R., Hunt, C., Hussain, A., Acreman, M. C., King, J., Malomo, S., Tate, E. L., O’Regan, D., Milner, S., & Steyl, I. (2003). The water Poverty Index: Development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, 27, 189-199.
- Khvesyk, M. A. (2013). Безпека водних ресурсів України у глобальному вимірі: монографія [Bezpeka vodnykh resursiv Ukrainy u hlobalnomu vymiri: monohrafiia]. Kyiv. Derzhavna ustanova “Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannia ta staloho rozvytku Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy”.
- Montaigne, F (2002, September). Water Pressure. National Geographic, 2(32), 2-32.
- Mumladze, R. G., Guzhina, G. N., Bykovskaja, N. V., & Kuz’mina, A. A. (2010). Управление водохозяйственными системами [Upravlenie vodohozjajstvennymi sistemami]. Moscow: KNORUS.
- Ohlsson, L. (1998). Water and social resource scarcity. FAO Issue Paper (FAO, Rome).
- Ohlsson, L (1999). Environment, scarcity and conflict: A study of Malthusian concerns. Department of Peace and Development Research. University of Göteborg.
- Raskin, P., Gleick, P., Kirshen, P., Pontius, G., & Strzepek, K. (1997). Water Futures: Assessment of longrange patterns and prospects. Stockholm Environment Institute.
- Seckler, D., Amarasinghe, U., Molden, D. J., de Silva, R., & Barker, R. (1998). World Water Demand and Supply,1990 to 2025: Scenarios and Issues (IWMI Research Report 19). IWMI, Colombo.
- Shiklomanov, I. A. (1991). The World’s water resources. In Proc. Int. Symp. To Commemorate 25 Years of the IHP (pp. 93-126). UNESCO/IHP, Paris.
- The official web site of Verkhovna Rada оf Ukraine. (2012). National Target Program on Water Resources Management and Environmental Rehabilitation of the Dnipro River for the period by 2021.
- UNEP. (2013). Climate Change – Adaptation – Nile Basin.
- UNESCO. (2012). The United Nations World Water Development Report 4. Paris, France: World Water Assessment Programme.
- UNESCO. 2013–2015. (2015). GRGTA (Groundwater Resources Governance in Transboundary Aquifers).
- UNESCO-IHP. (2012a). (Draft) Strategic Plan of the Eighth Phase of IHP (IHP-VIII, 2014-2021). Paris, France: UNESCO-IHP.
- United Nations. (2012). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2012. New York: United Nations.
- United Nations Department of Public Information. (2011). Security Council, in Statement, Say ’Contextual Information’ on Possible Security Implications of Climate Change Important When Climate Impacts Drive Conflict.
- UNW-DPC, UNESCO-IHP and BMU. (2009). Main Outcomes of the Workshop Education for Water Sustainability: Where Decades Meet. Bonn: UNW-DPC Publication Series, Knowledge No. 2.
- Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., & Lammers, R. B. (2000). Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289, 284-288.
- Waternunc.com (2010). Ministerial Declaration of The Hague on Water Security in the 21st Century (Second World Water Forum, March 22, 2000).
- World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP). (2012). The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk. Paris, France: UNESCO
- Zeitoun, M. (2011). The Global Web of National Water Security. Global Policy, 2(3), 286-296.