Effective synergic interaction of strategic business units of diversified company
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(4).2017.04
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #4, pp. 38-49
- Cited by
- 1158 Views
-
836 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Integration processes in the global economy promote the development of diversified integrated companies, representing a group of legally and economically independent and/or affiliated companies that carry out joint activities based on interaction and interconnections development. It is the study of the interconnections of strategic business units of diversified companies that allows to distinguish synergistic interaction features, which, in the long run, ensures the achievement of sustainable competitive advantages for companies. The main purpose of this study is to distinguish the features of the synergistic interaction of strategic business units of diversified companies and the creation of management tools for them. The authors developed and presented the simulation model for managing the interaction of strategic business units of diversified companies based on synergy and proposed an algorithm for its application in real business practice for a company operating in the building ceramic market.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M11, L20
-
References25
-
Tables0
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Simulation management model of SBU synergic interaction of diversified enterprises
- Figure 2. Ahromat Group business activity*
- Figure 3. SBUs’ interaction diagrams according to interaction scopes
- Figure 4. Integral matrix “interaction-synergism” for Ahromat Group
-
- Ackoff, R. (1970). Concept of Corporate Planning (172 р.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate Strategy (241 p.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Aronov, A. M. (2001). Стратегический анализ диверсифицированных предприятий [Strategicheskiy analiz diversifitsyrovannykh predpriyatiy] (27 p.). Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGUEF.
- Balan, V. H. (2008). Прийняття управлінських рішень. Методи, моделі, терміни, поняття, категорії. Тестові завдання. Ділові ігри [Pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen. Metody, modeli, terminy, poniattia, katehorii. Testovi zavdannia. Dilovi igry] (465 p.). Kyiv: Nichlava.
- Campbell, A., Sommers, K. L. (1998). Strategic Synergy (340 p.). London: International Thomson Business Press.
- Dobronravova, I. S. (1990). Синергетика: становление нелинейного мышления [Sinergetika: stanovlenie nelineinogo myshleniya] (147 p.). Kyev: Lybid.
- Hoshovska, O., Lymanskyi, A., & Poplavska, G. (2011). Синергізм у стратегічному управлінні [Synerhizm u stratehichnomu upravlinni] (283 p.). Lviv: Manuskrypt.
- James, J. H. Liou (2009). Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
- Karloff, B. (1989). Business Strategy. A Guide to Concepts and Models (166 р.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Kizim, M. O., Ponomarenko, V. S., Horbatov, V. M., & Yastremska, O. M. (2010). Інтегровані структури бізнесу: проблеми теорії та практики оцінювання конкурентоспроможності [Intehrovani struktury biznesu: problemy teorii ta praktyky otsinuvannia konkurentospromozhnosti] (368 p.). Kharkiv: INZHEK.
- Lambin, J. J. (2000–2007). Market- Driven Management: Strategic and Operational Marketing (624 р.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Maghsud Amiria (2011). Developing a DEMATEL method to prioritize distribution centers in supply chain. Management Science Letters, 1, 279-288.
- Mahajan, V., Wind, Y. (1988). Business Synergy Does Not Always Pay off. Long Range Planning, 21(1), 59-65.
- Milner, B. Z., Evenko, L. I., & Rapoport, V. S. (1983). Системный подход к организации управления [Sistemnyy podkhod k organizatsii upravleniya] (224 p.). Moscow: Ekonomika.
- Porter, M. (1987). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review.
- Pushkar, A. I., Zhukov, Yu. E., & Pylypenko, A. A. (2006). Стратегические группы предприятий: концепция, методология, управление [Strategicheskie gruppy predpriyatiy: kontseptsiya, metodologiya, upravlenie] (440 p.). Kharkov: Krossroud.
- Pylypenko, A. A. (2008). Стратегічна інтеграція підприємств: механізм управління та моделювання розвитку [Stratehichna intehratsiia pidpryiemstv: mekhanizm upravlinnia ta modeliuvannia rozvytku] (408 p.). Kharkiv: INZHEK.
- Saaty, T. L., Katz, J. M. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26.
- Safar Fazli (2012). Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for investment in stock exchange. Management Science Letters, 2, 457-468.
- Smerichevskyi, S. F. (2008). Зв’язано-диверсифіковані системи підприємств: генезис, моделювання та стратегічний аналіз [Zviazano-dyversyfikovani systemy pidpryiemstv: henezys, modeliuvannia ta stratehichnyi analiz] (375 p.). Donetsk: Don DUU.
- Wissema, H. (2002). Driving Through Red Lights – How Warning Signals are Missed of Ignored. Long Range Planning, 35(5), 521-539.
- Zhou, Y. M. (2011). Synergy, Co¬ordination Costs, And Diversification Choices. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 624-639.
- Ozturk, I., Anil, I. (2017). The Interaction of Firm Performance with International Geographic Diversification and Internal Factors: A Research On Borsa Istanbul Companies. Journal of Strategic Research in Social Science, 3(1), 31-42.
- Международный научно- производственный журнал «Керамика: наука и жизнь» [Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-proizvodstvennyy zhurnal “Keramika: nauka i zhyzn”] (2016).
- Промислово-технічна компанія у вигляді ТОВ «Агромат» [Promyslovo-tekhnichna kompaniia u vygliadi TOV “Ahromat”] (2017).