Relationship between artificial intelligence and legal education: A bibliometric analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.08(2).2024.02
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2024, Issue #2, pp. 13-27
- 98 Views
-
34 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to explore past research trends and identify key future directions at the intersection of artificial intelligence and legal education. The study’s data were gathered from the Scopus database, comprising 68 selected documents spanning from 1999 to 2024. The research methodology involves the use of VOSviewer software for bibliometric analysis. The results reveal that research on artificial intelligence and legal education, while still limited, has been undertaken in various countries, focusing on five primary research directions, including: (1) Improving technical education systems in colleges and universities through educational technology and modern legal learning systems; (2) Application of artificial intelligence and algorithms in the legal field; (3) Applying computational theory and e-learning technology in legal education; (4) Legal education and legal knowledge; (5) Digital transformation in the field of legal training. Based on the research results, five future research directions on this topic are also proposed, including: (1) Application of artificial intelligence in analyzing and predicting legal trends; (2) Artificial intelligence in personalizing the legal learning experience; (3) Artificial intelligence and legal professional ethics; (4) Development of artificial intelligence tools supporting legal teaching and research; and (5) Integration of artificial intelligence into online learning systems for legal education.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M53, K10, K30, I21
-
References45
-
Tables5
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Research procedures
- Figure 2. Analysis by number of documents and citations
- Figure 3. Statistics of countries with many publications on AI and legal education topics
- Figure 4. Analysis by type of publication
- Figure 5. Analysis by field of publication
- Figure 6. Co-citation network map by authors
- Figure 7. Map of co-occurrence by keywords
- Figure 8. Overlay visualization map of co-occurrence by keywords
-
- Table 1. Some statistical indicators about the number of documents and citations
- Table 2. Statistics of co-authorship relationships between countries
- Table 3. Top 10 journals/conference proceedings
- Table 4. Top article or conference paper with the highest citations
- Table 5. Keyword analysis statistics
-
- Ajevski, M., Barker, K., Gilbert, A., Hardie, L., & Ryan, F. (2023). ChatGPT and the future of legal education and practice. The Law Teacher, 57(3), 352-364.
- Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. H. (2018). How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(1), 106-124.
- Aleven, V., Ashley, K. D., & Lynch, C. (2005). Helping law students to understand US Supreme Court oral arguments: A planned experiment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 55-59).
- Aydemir, E., & Cebeci, H. I. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Law: A Bibliometric Insight into Academic Publications and Research Trends. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications, IDAACS (pp. 1120-1124).
- Babacan, A., & Babacan, H. (2015). A transformative approach to work integrated learning in legal education. Education and Training, 57(2), 170-183.
- Bex, F. J. (2024). AI, Law and beyond. A transdisciplinary ecosystem for the future of AI & Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-18.
- Biresaw, S. M. (2023). The Impacts of Artificial Intelligence on Research in the Legal Profession. Upcoming in International Journal of Law and Society.
- Connell, W., & Black, M. H. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence and Legal Education. The Computer & Internet Lawyer, 36(5), 14-19.
- Demchenko, M. V., Gulieva, M. E., Larina, T. V., & Simaeva, E. P. (2021). Digital Transformation of Legal Education: Problems, Risks and Prospects. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(2), 297-307.
- Douglas, K., & Johnson, B. (2010). Legal Education and E-Learning: Online Fishbowl Role-Play as a Learning and Teaching Strategy in Legal Skills Development. ELaw Journal, 17(1), 28-46.
- Egelandsdal, K., & Færstad, J. O. (2024). Student-active lectures in legal education. The Law Teacher, 1-16.
- Fobel, P., & Kuzior, A. (2019). The future (Industry 4.0) is closer than we think. Will it also be ethical? AIP Conference Proceedings, 2186(1).
- Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.
- Goodenough, O. R. (2012). Developing an E-Curriculum: Reflections on the Future of Legal Education and on the Importance of Digital Expertise. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 88(3), 845.
- Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Study on its Impact in the Scientific Literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51.
- Hu, T., & Lu, H. (2020). Study on the Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Legal Profession. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2019) (pp. 964-968).
- Janeček, V., Williams, R., & Keep, E. (2021). Education for the provision of technologically enhanced legal services. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105519.
- Kambayashi, Y. (2004). Overview of the COE program. Proceedings - International Conference on Informatics Research for Development of Knowledge Society Infrastructure, ICKS 2004 (pp. 1-4). Kyoto, Japan.
- Kapoor, A., Pandey, A., & Rose, E. (2024). Virtual Learning and Legal Education Emerging Trends, Adaptability, and Effectiveness. In Architecture and Technological Advancements of Education 4.0. IGI Global.
- Katz, D. M., Bommarito, M. J., Gao, S., & Arredondo, P. (2024). GPT-4 passes the bar exam. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 382(2270).
- Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6069-6104.
- Kopotun, I. M., Durdynets, M. Y., Teremtsova, N. V., Markina, L. L., & Prisnyakova, L. M. (2020). The use of smart technologies in the professional training of students of the law departments for the development of their critical thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 174-187.
- Leung, X. Y., Sun, J., & Bai, B. (2017). Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 35-45.
- Ma, B., & Hou, Y. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Empowers the Integrated Development of Legal Education: Challenges and Responses. Future Human Image, 16, 43-54.
- Maharg, P. (2016). Transforming Legal Education: Learning and Teaching the Law in the Early Twenty-first Century. Routledge.
- Mania, K. (2023). Legal Technology: Assessment of the Legal Tech Industry’s Potential. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 595-619.
- Maphosa, V., & Maphosa, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric analysis and topic modeling approach. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), 2261730.
- Mommers, L., Voermans, W., Koelewijn, W., & Kielman, H. (2009). Understanding the law: Improving legal knowledge dissemination by translating the contents of formal sources of law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 17(1), 51-78.
- Mustapha, S. S. (2024). The use of technology and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in legal education. Fountain University Law Journal, 1(2), 70-82.
- Narin, F. (1987). Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of research programs. Science and Public Policy, 14(2), 99-106.
- Pradana, M., Elisa, H. P., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2243134.
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349.
- Qiu, J. P., Dong, K., & Yu, H. Q. (2014). Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1345-1360.
- Rahayu, S. T. (2023). Analyzing of Using Educational Technology to Improve the Quality and Equity of Learning Outcomes at Politeknik Maritim Negeri. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 100-116.
- Reed, C., & Grasso, F. (2007). Recent advances in computational models of natural argument. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22(1), 1-15.
- Saxer, S. R. (2000). One Professor’s Approach to Increasing Technology Use in Legal Education. Richmond Journal of Law and Technology, 6(4), 1999-2000.
- Shahzadi, S., Iqbal, M., & Chaudhry, N. R. (2021). 6G Vision: Toward Future Collaborative Cognitive Communication (3C) Systems. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 5(2), 60-67.
- Shi, S. J., Li, J. W., & Zhang, R. (2024). A study on the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence supported Situational Interactive Teaching on students’ ‘flow’ experience and learning effectiveness – a case study of legal education in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 112-138.
- Silva, F. S. V., Schulz, P. A., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2019). Co-authorship networks and research impact in large research facilities: benchmarking internal reports and bibliometric databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 93-108.
- Simpson, B. (2016). Algorithms or advocacy: does the legal profession have a future in a digital world? Information & Communications Technology Law, 25(1), 50-61.
- Thanaraj, A., & Gledhill, K. (2023). Teaching legal education in the digital age: Pedagogical practices to digitally empower law graduates. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Valanciene, L., & Valanciene, D. (2022). Trends in legal ethics research: a bibliometric analysis. Legal Ethics, 25(1-2), 109-133.
- Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070.
- Wei, L., & Fengru, Z. (2021). Innovative research on legal talents training model in the era of artificial intelligence. ICCSE 2021 – IEEE 16th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (pp. 257-262).
- Xu, M., Hirota, K., & Yoshino, H. (1999). Fuzzy theoretical approach to case-based representation and inference in CISG. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7(2), 259-272.