The effect of lean tool on research culture and research performance in Indonesia’s higher education institutions
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.08(1).2024.07
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2024, Issue #1, pp. 91-103
- 313 Views
-
71 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Quality Assurance in higher education is a lean tool to improve the quality and performance of HEIs, including lecturer research performance. This study examines the effect of implementing Quality Assurance in higher education as a lean tool on the research culture and research performance of lecturers at Indonesia’s private HEIs. The data represent respondents’ perceptions of the research variable indicators. 184 questionnaires were suitable for processing. Data were collected from 184 lecturers from approximately 25 private HEIs in Jakarta, Indonesia. A 5-point Likert scale was used to measure indicators of research variables. Statistical data analysis was carried out using Structural Equation Modeling with the Smart-PLS ™ program. The results show that Quality Assurance as a lean tool has a significant impact on research performance (β = 0.643; p = 0.000) and research culture (β = 0.361; p = 0.000). Research culture affected research performance significantly (β = 0.281; p = 0.000), and research culture significantly mediates the effect of Quality Assurance as a lean tool on the research performance (β = 0.102; p = 0.010), and the effect is strong (Ѵ = 0.181). Research findings reveal that the successful implementation of Quality Assurance as a lean tool is determined more by organizational readiness than individual readiness; this is reflected in the existence of effective research centers. An effective research center will support the standardization of research processes through continuous improvement so that lecturers behave more actively in scientific activities and perform research more productively.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, D83
-
References65
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Implementation of QA in HE as a lean tool to research performance (Model 1)
- Figure 2. Implementation of QA in HE as a lean tool to research performance (Model 2)
-
- Table 1. Indicators of QA as a lean tool
- Table 2. Research culture indicators
- Table 3. Research performance indicators
- Table 4. Construct reliability and validity
- Table 5. HTMT value in discriminant validity
- Table 6. New HTMT value in discriminant validity
- Table 8. Predictive relevance (Q2)
- Table 9. Model fit
-
- Adapa, P. K. (2013). Strategies and Factors Effecting Internationalization of University Research and Education.
- Alefari, M., Salonitis, K., & Xu, Y. (2017). The role of leadership in implementing lean manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 63, 756-761.
- Antony, J. (2014). Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(2), 257-264.
- Anwar, R. (2014). The Secret to Making Operations More Effective and Efficient (In Indonesian).
- Ardimen, A., & Gustina, G. (2018). Penguatan Budaya Meneliti Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset Di Perguruan Tinggi [Strengthening Research Culture Through Research-Based Learning in Higher Education]. TA’DIB, 21(2). (In Indonesian).
- Balzer W. K., Francis, D. E., Krehbiel, T. C., & Shea, N. A. (2016). A review and perspective on Lean in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(4), 442-462.
- Balzer, W. K. (2020). Lean Higher Education: Increasing the Value and Performance of University Process. Routledge: Productivity Press.
- Bates, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (1995). Computerized performance monitoring: A review of human resource issues. Human Resource Management Review, 5(4), 267-288.
- Bergmiller, G. G., & Mccright, P. R. (2009). Are Lean and Green Programs Synergistic? Proceedings of the 2009 Industrial Engineering Research Conference (pp. 1155-1160).
- Bortolotti, T., Boscari, S., & Danese, P. (2015). Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 182-201.
- Broström, A. (2019). Academic breeding grounds: Home department conditions and early career performance of academic researchers. Research Policy, 48(7), 1647-1665.
- Cadden, T., Millar, K., Treacy, R., & Humphreys, P. (2020). The mediating influence of organisational cultural practices in successful Lean Management Implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107744.
- Campbell, J. P., Mchenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling Job Performance In a Population of Jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43(2), 313-575.
- Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2006). Factors That Motivate Business Faculty to Conduct Research: An Expectancy Theory Analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 179-189.
- Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). University of Houston.
- Conti, A., Denas, O., & Visentin, F. (2014). Knowledge specialization in Ph.D. Student Groups. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Forthcoming (pp. 52-67).
- Cua, K. O., Mckone, K. E., & Schroeder, R. G. (2001). Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19(6), 675-694.
- Department of Trade and Industry/Department for Education and Employment (DTI/DfEE). (2001). Opportunity for All in a World of Change: A White Paper on Enterprise, Skills and Innovation. London: HMSO.
- Eldor, L., & Harpaz, I. (2016). A process model of employee engagement: The learning climate and its relationship with extra-role performance behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 213-235
- Emiliani, M. L. (2004). Improving business school courses by applying lean principles and practices. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(4), 175-187.
- Engebretsen, E., Heggen, K., & Eilertsen, H. A. (2012). Accreditation and Power: A Discourse Analysis of a New Regime of Governance in Higher Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(4), 401-417.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Kloftten, M. (2005). The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development. R&D Management, 35(3), 243-255.
- Evans, L. (2007). Developing research cultures and researchers in HE: the role of leadership. In Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE).
- Farida, F., Prabowo, H. A, & Vidayanti, D. (2019). Evaluation of the foster program as an effort to accelerate the implementation of the quality assurance system in Indonesian private university. ACADEMIA, 16-17, 145-167.
- Farida, F., Prabowo, H. A., & Husnur, A. (2021). The readiness of human resources and organization in implementing total quality management (TQM) in Indonesia’s manufacturing industries. Journal of Engineering Research, 9(4A), 246-261.
- Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Chaikittisilp, S., & Tan, K. H. (2018) The effect of lean methods and tools on the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations, International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 170-180.
- Hadid, W., & Mansouri, S. A. (2014). The lean-performance relationship in services: A theoretical model. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 34(6), 750-785.
- Hadid, W., Mansouri, S. A., & Gallear, D. (2016). Is lean service promising? A socio-technical perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 36(3), 618-642.
- Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publication.
- Hidayah, N., Hapsari, D. W., Saputra, K. A. K., Dharmawan, N. A. S., & Yadiati, W. (2023). Can Institutional Good Governance and Intellectual Capital Affect University Quality? International Journal of Economics and Management, 17(2), 251-261.
- Holt, H. S. F., Armenakis, A. A., Field, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232-255.
- Jarvis, D. S. L. (2014). Regulating higher education: Quality assurance and neo-liberal managerialism in higher education – A critical introduction. Policy and Society, 33, 155-166.
- Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational theory, design, and change (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Kang, Y., & Liu, R. (2021). Does the merger of universities promote their scientific research performance? Evidence from China. Research Policy, 50, 104098.
- Kusumawijaya, I. K., & Astuti, P. D. (2023). The effect of human capital on innovation: The mediation role of knowledge creation and knowledge sharing in small companies. Knowledge and Performance Management, 7(1), 64-75.
- Lopes, R. B., Freitas, F., & Sousa, I. (2015). Application of Lean Manufacturing Tools in the Food and Beverage Industries. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 10(3).
- Maxwell, T. M., & Smyth, R. (2011). Higher degree research supervision: from practice toward theory. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 219-231.
- Mohammad, I. S., & Oduoza, C. F. (2019). Interactions of Lean enablers in Manufacturing SMEs using Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach – a case study of KRI. Procedia Manufacturing, 38, 900-907.
- Naoreen, B., & Adeeb, M. A. (2014). Investigating Academic Research Culture in Public Sector Universities of Pakistan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3010-3015.
- Ogbeibu, S., & Gaskin, J. (2023). Back from the Future: Mediation and Prediction of Events Uncertainty through Event-Driven Models (EDMs). FIIB Business Review, 12(1), 10-19.
- Ommering, B. W. C., van Blankenstein, F. M., Waaijer, C. J. F., & Dekker, F. W. (2018). Future physician-scientists: could we catch them young? Factors influencing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for research among first-year medical students. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(4), 248-255.
- Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158.
- Petersen, A. M., Fortunato, S., Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., Penner, O., Rungi, A., Riccaboni A., Stanley, H. E., & Pammolli, F. (2014). Reputation and impact in academic careers. PNAS, 111, 15316-15321.
- Petrusch, A., Roehe Vaccaro, G. L., & Luchese, J. (2018). They teach, but do they apply? An exploratory survey about the use of Lean thinking in Brazilian higher education institutions. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 10(3), 743-766.
- Prabowo, H. A., Farida, F., & Adesta, E. Y. T. (2022). The Effect of Lean Waste Reduction Technique to Business Results: a Confirmatory Study. Management and Production Engineering Review, 13(2), 92-101.
- Purushothaman, M. B., Seadon, J., & Moore, D. (2020). Lean tools in a multicultural environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121681.
- Radnor, Z. (2010). Transferring lean into government. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(3), 411-428.
- Ratter, E., & Nader, S. (2022). The use of lean management tools in production companies with implemented total quality management (TQM). European Research Studies Journal, XXV(3), 357-368.
- Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Arredondo-Soto, K., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., & Ravelom G. (2018). Applying the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) Cycle to Reduce the Defects in the Manufacturing Industry. A Case Study. Applied Sciences, 8(11), 2181.
- Sanyal, B. C., & Martin, M. (2007). Quality Assurance and The Role of Accreditation: An Overview. Higher Education in The World 2007.
- Scalia, M., Barile, S., Saviano, M., & Farioli, F. (2018). Governance for sustainability: a triple-helix model. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1235-1244.
- Sharma, M., Kumar, U., & Lalande, L. (2006). Role of University Technology Transfer Offices in University Technology Commercialization: Case Study of the Carleton University Foundry Program. Journal of Services Research, 6, 109-139.
- Silva, S., Sá, J. C., Silva, F. J., Ferreira, L. P., & Santos, G. (2020). Lean green – the importance of integrating environment into lean philosophy – a case study. In Proceedings of the 6th European Lean Educator Conference (pp. 211-219). Springer International Publishing.
- Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2009). Dynamic Performance. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Industrial Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 548-575).
- Spear, S., & Bowen, H. K. (1999). Decoding The DNA of The Toyota Production System. Harvard Business Review.
- Sukirno, S. (2020). Dataset of lecturer performance appraisal. Data in Brief, 32, 106161.
- Tyagi, S., Cai, X., Yanga, K., & Chambers, T. (2015). Lean tools and methods to support efficient knowledge creation. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 204-214.
- Urban, W. (2015). The Lean Management Maturity Self-Assessment Tool Based on Organizational Culture Diagnosis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 728-733.
- Vlachos, I., & Siachou, E (2018) An empirical investigation of workplace factors affecting lean performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(2), 278-296.
- Vukadinovic, S., Djapan, M., & Macuzic, I. (2016). Education For Lean & Lean for Education: A Literature Review. International Journal for Quality Research, 11(1), 35-50.
- Waldinger, E. (2010). Quality matters: the expulsion of professors and the consequences for PhD student outcomes in Nazi Germany. Journal of Political Economy, 118(4), 787-831.
- Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean Thinking. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
- Worley, J. M., & Doolen, T. L. (2015). Organizational structure, employee problem solving, and lean implementation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 6(1), 39-58.
- Zhang, L., & Chen, X. (2016). Role of lean tools in supporting knowledge creation and performance in lean construction. Procedia Engineering, 145, 1267-1274.
- Zhang, X. (2014). Factors that Motivate Academic Staff to Conduct Research and Influence Research Productivity in Chinese Project 211 Universities (Doctoral Thesis). University of Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.