Why public education is unequal: case of Ukrainian rural schools
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.01(1).2017.02
-
Article InfoVolume 1 2017, Issue #1, pp. 19-26
- 1380 Views
-
257 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Ukrainian educational system is not able to provide equal access to the university, regardless of children’s socio-economic background. Despite of the anti-discrimination ideas in legislation and in public discourse (with implementation of transparent mechanism of selection in 2004 - External Independent Testing), there are statistically significant differences in the results of EIT (that defines chances to get higher education) between children from rural area and their peers from urban schools (especially from elite ones). The research is based on Bourdieu’s theoretical concept of capitals and seven in-depth interviews with teachers from rural schools in different regions of Ukraine. Based on the findings, the author divides mechanisms of reproduction of educational inequality into four dimensions: economic capital of the school, economic capital of the family, cultural capital of the school and cultural capital of the family. Current educational reforms of secondary and higher education in Ukraine will not improve situation with access to higher education for children from poor social background. Closing of unprofitable universities and schools in rural area, expending the years of studying at school and implementation on funding reallocation based on a competition with financial support only of those, who are more successful, will deepen educational inequality, making accesses to the mechanism of improving socio-economic position even more dependent from socio-economic background.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I24, O15
-
References15
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Average score of External Independent Testing results by type of school and place of residence (2014)
- Table 2. General information about schools
-
- Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J. (1979). The inheritors: French students and their relation to culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 22.
- Bourdieu, P. (1998). The state nobility: elite schools in the field of power. Stanford University Press.
- Briginets, M. and Grushetsky, A. (2010). Comparative analysis of normal and elite schools in Ukraine, Commons Education Policy, N 3, pp. 86-96.
- Devine, F. (2004). Class practices. How parents help their children get good jobs. Cambridge University Press.
- International Monetary Fund. (2015). Ukraine: a letter of intent. Kyiv.
- Kvit, S. (2015). Changes needed: content and objectives of the educational reform, Ukrainian Pravda.
- Kyiv International Institute of Sociology. (2013). Dynamics of Internet use in Ukraine.
- Muliavka, V. and Oksamytna, S. (2015). Educational inequality by type of residence and type of educational institution, Scientific notes of NaUKMA. Sociological Sciences, N 174, pp. 9-20.
- OECD. (2016). Country statistical profile: United States 2016.
- Oksamytna, S. (2006). Intergenerational educational mobility in the context of the three age cohorts of the population of modern Ukraine, Scientific notes of NaKUMA, Sociological Sciences, N 10, pp. 58-65.
- Reay, D. (1998). Class work: Mothers’ involvement in their children’s primary schooling. Taylor & Francis.
- The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On Approval of the State Standard of Full Secondary Education” dated April 20, 2011 № 1392.
- The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “The draft Law on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine” dated 15 September, 2016, № 5130.
- The World Bank. (2015). Gross enrolment ratio, tertiary, both sexes (%).
- Ukrainian Center for Educational Quality Assessment. Official Report of an external independent testing of educational achievements of persons who wish to enter higher educational institutions of Ukraine in 2014.