ESG or financial metrics? What retail investors really look for in decision-making
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(1).2025.27
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #1, pp. 351-368
- 54 Views
-
9 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
With the increasing global emphasis on responsible investing, this study explores the tradeoff between ESG and traditional financial metrics in shaping the investment decisions of retail investors in India. A within-subject experimental design was employed at Christ University, India, involving an initial sample of 75 participants, with 55 completing all three experiment rounds. The sample respondents evaluated masked stock profiles across three rounds, where updated financial and ESG information on masked stock was provided at each round. The results indicate that though ESG metrics are getting attention among retail investors, financial metrics are still the main determining factor for investment. It was found that ROE (52 responses), 3-year CAGR Net Profit (36 responses), and P/E ratios (48 responses) are the most influencing factors to make investment decisions. Similarly, ESG factors (Governance, Environmental, and Sustainability scores) are also frequently mentioned, with 74 citations. Retail investors mainly consider profitability and view ESG as risk-mitigating or neutralizing factors. While evaluating the ESG factors, retailers mainly look at the firm’s environmental concerns, followed by governance and social factors. This result contrasts with the previous studies in this domain, where the literature emphasized governance factors more than environmental factors. These results highlight the integration of ESG elements, as retail investors remain with favorable returns and sacrifice sustainability. Further, this study spots the need for better and quantifiable ESG performance reports to consider alternative data comparable to financial data for better investment decisions.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G40, G41
-
References49
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Chart showing investment in companies at different rounds
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics for investment values
- Table 2. Multivariate test results
- Table 3. Mauchly’s test of sphericity
- Table 4 Within-subjects effects
- Table 5. Tests of between-subjects effects
- Table 6. Key decision-making factors
- Table 7. Frequency of cited decision factors
- Table 8. Observed investor behaviors
-
- Aczel, B., Szollosi, A., & Bago, B. (2018). The effect of transparency on framing effects in within-subject designs. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(1), 25-39.
- Almeyda, R., & Darmansya, A. (2019). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure on firm financial performance. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 5, 278.
- Ashraf, R., & Merunka, D. (2017). The use and misuse of student samples: An empirical investigation of European marketing research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(4), 295-308.
- Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2017). The econometrics of randomised experiments. In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, 1, 73-140. North-Holland.
- Axt, J. R., Nguyen, H., & Nosek, B. A. (2018). The Judgment Bias Task: A flexible method for assessing individual differences in social judgment biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 337-355.
- Bahadori, N., Kaymak, T., & Seraj, M. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance factors in emerging markets: The impact on firm performance. Business Strategy & Development, 4(4), 411-422.
- Ballestero, E., Bravo, M., Perez-Gladish, B., Arenas-Parra, M., & Pla-Santamaria, D. (2012). Socially responsible investment: A multicriteria approach to portfolio selection combining ethical and financial objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 487-494.
- Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1).
- Caglio, A., Melloni, G., & Perego, P. (2019). Informational content and assurance of textual disclosures: Evidence on integrated reporting. European Accounting Review, 29(1), 55-83.
- Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Kuhn, M. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1-8.
- Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., Dissanayake, P. D., Withana, P. A., Chib, R., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the challenges of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: The path to broader sustainable development. Sustainability, 16(2), 606.
- Cicchiello, A. F., Cotugno, M., & Foroni, C. (2023). Does competition affect ESG controversies? Evidence from the banking industry. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103972.
- Doni, F., & Fiameni, M. (2023). Can innovation affect the relationship between environmental, social, and governance issues and financial performance? Empirical evidence from the STOXX200 index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 546-574.
- Eccles, R. G., Kastrapeli, M. D., & Potter, S. J. (2017). How to integrate ESG into investment decision-making: Results of a global survey of institutional investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 29(4), 125-133.
- EUROSIF. (2023). European SRI Study.
- Garefalakis, A., & Dimitras, A. (2020). Looking back and forging ahead: The weighting of ESG factors. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1-2), 151-189.
- Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83.
- Giese, G., Nagy, Z., & Lee, L. (2020). Deconstructing ESG ratings performance: Risk and return for E, S, and G by time horizon, sector, and weighting. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(3), 94-111.
- Ha, N. M., Nguyen, P. A., Luan, N. V., & Tam, N. M. (2023). Impact of green innovation on environmental performance and financial performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(7), 17083-17104.
- Hughes, A., Urban, M. A., & Wójcik, D. (2021). Alternative ESG ratings: How technological innovation is reshaping sustainable investment. Sustainability, 13(6), 3551.
- In, S. Y., Rook, D., & Monk, A. (2019). Integrating Alternative Data (ESG Data) in Investment Decision Making. Global Economic Review, 48(3), 237-260.
- Jeffers, J., Lyu, T., & Posenau, K. (2024). The risk and return of impact investing funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 161, 103928.
- Khemir S., Baccouche C., & Ayadi S.D (2019). The influence of ESG information on Investment allocation decisions: An experimental Study in an Emerging Country. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(4), 458-480.
- Kotsantonis, S., Pinney, C., & Serafeim, G. (2016). ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 10-16.
- Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50-58.
- La Rosa, F., & Bernini, F. (2022). ESG controversies and the cost of equity capital of European listed companies: The moderating effects of ESG performance and market securities regulation. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(5), 641-663.
- Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11-27.
- Liu, X., Cifuentes-Faura, J., Zhao, S., & Wang, L. (2024). The impact of government environmental attention on firms’ ESG performance: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102124.
- Lopez-de-Silanes, F., McCahery, J., & Pudschedl, P. (2024). Institutional investors and ESG preferences. Corporate Governance: An International Review.
- Maiti, M. (2020). Is ESG the succeeding risk factor? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(3), 199-213.
- Minkkinen, M., Niukkanen, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022). What about investors? ESG analyses as tools for ethics-based AI auditing. AI & SOCIETY, 39(1), 329-343.
- Moss, A., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2024). The irrelevance of environmental, social, and governance disclosure to retail investors. Management Science, 70(4), 2626-2644.
- Oprean-Stan, C., Oncioiu, I., Iuga, I. C., & Stan, S. (2020). Impact of sustainability reporting and inadequate management of ESG factors on corporate performance and sustainable growth. Sustainability, 12(20), 8536.
- Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572-597.
- Pei, Z., Pischke, J. S., & Schwandt, H. (2018). Poorly Measured Confounders are More Useful on the Left than on the Right. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), 205-216.
- Perez-Gladish, B., Benson, K., & Faff, R. (2012). Profiling socially responsible investors: Australian evidence. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 189-209.
- Petelczyc, J. (2022). The readiness for ESG among retail investors in central and Eastern Europe. The example of Poland. Global Business Review, 23(6), 1299-1315.
- Pompella, M., & Costantino, L. (2023). ESG disclosure and sustainability transition: A new metric and emerging trends in responsible investments. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 13(1), 8-39.
- Przychodzen, J., Gómez-Bezares, F., Przychodzen, W., & Larreina, M. (2016). ESG Issues among fund managers – factors and motives. Sustainability, 8(10).
- Raut K. R., Shastri N., Mishra A. K., & Tiwari A K. (2023). Investor’s values and Investment Decisions towards ESG stocks. Review of Accounting and Finance, 22(4), 449-465).
- Schwörer, J. (2024). Mainstream parties and global warming: What determines parties’ engagement in climate protection? European Journal of Political Research, 63(1), 303-325.
- Sharma, U., Gupta, A., & Gupta, S. K. (2022). The pertinence of incorporating ESG ratings to make investment decisions: A quantitative analysis using machine learning. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(1), 184-198.
- Sood, K., Pathak, P., Jain, J., & Gupta, S. (2023). How does an investor prioritise ESG factors in India? An assessment based on fuzzy AHP. Managerial Finance, 49(1), 66-87.
- Sultana, S., Zulkifli, N., & Zainal, D. (2018). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) and investment decision in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 10(6), 1831.
- Van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 525-533.
- Vintila, G., & Gherghina, S. C. (2012). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate governance ratings and listed companies’ performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(22), 46-61.
- Von Wallis, M., & Klein, C. (2015). Ethical requirement and financial interest: a literature review on socially responsible investing. Business Research, 8, 61-98.
- Weston, P., & Nnadi, M. (2021). Evaluation of strategic and financial variables of corporate sustainability and ESG policies on corporate finance performance. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1058-1074.
- Young-Ferris, A., & Roberts, J. (2021). ‘Looking for Something that Isn’t There’: A Case Study of an Early Attempt at ESG Integration in Investment Decision Making. European Accounting Review, 32(3), 717-744.