Uncovering the greenium: Investigating the yield spread between green and conventional bonds
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.05
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #2, pp. 56-69
- 298 Views
-
110 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Green bonds are an increasingly used instrument to catalyze cash flows towards a low-carbon economy. Nonetheless, the existence of an actual price advantage is still uncertain. This research paper aims to assess whether there is a green bond premium (“greenium”) for green bonds relative to conventional bonds with similar characteristics, and how liquidity may affect the determination of a price advantage. It analyzes the yield differentials between green and conventional bonds using three different methods. First, a Nelson-Siegel-Svensson method is executed, estimating the premium both as the yield spreads and as the differentials in Z-spreads. Using a matching method and creating a sample of green and synthetic conventional bonds, the second methodology consists in calculating the distances between each categories’ yield for the same duration. Finally, a fixed-effect regression is performed to better control the liquidity bias. In the first case, a positive premium emerges when analyzing the yield spreads (+37.89 basis points) and the Z-spreads (+10.62 basis points). The second method mitigates the liquidity risk by creating a sample of synthetic bonds and reveals a yield spread of –15.89 basis points. Lastly, the regression method shows a negative greenium equal to –17.1487 basis points. Thus, a greenium emerges from all the three different methods, but its nature, sign, and real determinants are still uncertain. It is, therefore, not possible to conclude a definite price advantage for issuers of green bonds.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G12, Q56
-
References24
-
Tables5
-
Figures7
-
- Figure 1. Collateral type distribution
- Figure 2. Sample distribution by number of bonds of issued volumes in million EUR
- Figure 3. Sample distribution of rating classes by number of bonds and total issued amount
- Figure 4. Sample distribution of sectors for the number of issuers
- Figure 5. Nelson-Siegel-Svensson method: Yield spread differentials
- Figure 6. Nelson-Siegel-Svensson method: Z-spread differentials
- Figure 7. Yield spread method: Yield distribution
-
- Table 1. Main features of green bonds
- Table 2. Statistics of conventional bonds
- Table 3. Data sample statistics
- Table 4. Panel regression method: Statistics of the variables
- Table 5. Panel regression method: Statistics of the greenium
-
- Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2018). Financing the Response to Climate Change:The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds.
- Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 436-455.
- Climate Bonds Initiative. (2017). Green bond pricing in the primary market: January 2016 – March 2017.
- Climate Bonds Initiative. (2018). Green Bonds: The state of the market 2018.
- Climate Bonds Initiative. (2019, October 21). Green bond issuance tops $200bn milestone October sees new global record in green finance.
- Ehlers, T., & Packer, F. (2018). Green bond finance and certification. SUERF The Eurpean Money and Finance Forum.
- Febrian, E., & Herwany, A. (2008). Liquidity Measurement Based on Bid-Ask Spread, Trading Frequency, and Liquidity Ratio: The Use of GARCH Model on Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSX). Economic Journal.
- Gilli, M., Große, S., & Schumann, E. (2010). Calibrating the Nelson–Siegel–Svensson model. COMISEF Working Paper Series.
- Helwege, J., Huang, J., & Wang, Y. (2014). Liquidity effects in corporate bond spreads. Journal of Banking and Finance, 45, 105-116.
- International Capital Market Association. (2018). Green Bond Principles: Voluntary Process Guidelines for Issuing Green Bonds.
- Karpf, A., & Mandel, A. (2018). The changing value of the “green” label on the US municipal bond market. Paris: Nature Climate Change.
- Katori, T. (2018). The Financial Potential of Green Bonds: Comparing the Three Issuing Schemes. Yokohama: Yokohama National University, Yokohama Business School..
- Kazemie, N. (2014). Mispricing Due to Nelson-Siegel-Svensson model. Västerås: Mälardalen University.
- Lawler, T. A. (1982). Default, risk and yield spreads: A clarification. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 8(4), 65-66.
- Nelson, C. R., & Siegel, A.F. (1987). Parsimonious modeling of yield curves. Journal of Business, 473-489.
- Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 693-709.
- Partridge, C., & Medda, F. (2018). Green Premium in the Primary and Secondary. London: QASER Laboratory, University College London.
- Preclaw, R., & Bakshi, A. (2015). The Cost of Being Green. Barclays.
- Sarig, O., & Warga, A. (1989). Bond Price Data and Bond Market Liquidity. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24(3), 367-378.
- Schmitt, S. J. (2017). A parametric approach to estimate the green bond premium. A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance at NOVA – School of Business and Economics and the Professional Master Degree in Economics at INSPER.
- Strassberger, M. (2012). Yield spreads, value of bonds and implications for liquidity management - and empirical analysis during the crisis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 9(2), 146-154.
- Svensson, L. E. (1994). Estimating and interpreting forward interest rates: Sweden 1992–1994 (Working Paper, 4871).
- Wahlstrøm, R. R., Paraschiv, F., & Schürle, M. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of Parsimonious Yield Curve Models with Focus on the Nelson-Siegel, Svensson and Bliss Versions. Springer Link, Computational Economics, 59, 967-1004.
- Zerbib, O. D. (2018). Is There a Green Bond Premium? The yield differential between green and conventional bonds.