Does internal audit matter? Audit committee, its attributes, and corporate social responsibility reporting quality
-
Author(s)Oleh PaskoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-5885
,
Li ZhangLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-8630
,
Nelia ProskurinaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-1720
,
Natalia RyzhikovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3019-8172
,
Yelyzaveta MykhailovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-1548
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.06
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #2, pp. 70-88
- 76 Views
-
11 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study explores the nexus between internal audit, audit committee attributes, and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure quality in A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2010 to 2019. Utilizing refined samples and robust datasets, this investigation reveals critical insights that a robust internal control system significantly correlates with higher-quality CSR disclosure, underscoring its pivotal role in safeguarding non-financial reporting integrity and enhancing transparency in CSR disclosures. Larger audit committees are positively associated with improved CSR disclosure quality. This highlights the strategic advantage of a diverse and expansive audit committee in navigating the complexities of CSR reporting. Contrary to expectations, the proportion of independent directors on the audit committee and the frequency of audit committee meetings do not show a significant positive relationship with CSR disclosure. Companies benefit from strategic investments in internal control systems, crucial for non-financial reporting integrity and fortified CSR disclosure practices. In conclusion, this study provides concise insights into critical factors influencing CSR disclosure quality in Chinese companies, offering actionable implications for corporate practices and regulatory frameworks.
Acknowledgment
This paper is co-funded by the European Union through the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) within the project “EU BEST PRACTICE OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING” – 101047667-ERASMUS-JMO-2021-MODULE https://jm.snau.edu.ua/en/eu-best-practice-of-life-cycle-assessment-social-environmental-accounting-and-sustainability-reporting/
Oleh Pasko expresses sincere gratitude for the support from the Kirkland Research Program, generously provided by the Leaders of Change Foundation established by the Polish-American Freedom Foundation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, M14, M41
-
References45
-
Tables9
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sampling
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlations matrix
- Table 4. Regression analysis IV
- Table A1. Prior studies on the relationship between internal audit and CSR reporting quality
- Table A2. Variable definitions
- Table A3. Regression analysis I
- Table A4. Regression analysis II
- Table A5. Regression analysis III
-
- Abu Afifa, M. M., Saleh, I., Al-Zaghilat, M., Thuneibat, N., & Nguyen, N. M. (2023). Does CSR disclosure mediate the board characteristics-cost of equity capital nexus? Evidence from Jordanian services companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
- Al-Najjar, B. (2011). The Determinants of Audit Committee Independence and Activity: Evidence from the UK. International Journal of Auditing, 15(2), 191-203.
- Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2018). Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 973-986.
- Alkayed, H., & Omar, B. F. (2023). Determinants of the extent and quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in the industrial and services sectors: the case of Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(5), 1206-1245.
- Alkurdi, A., Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2023). The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship between the board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business.
- Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 187-216.
- Appuhami, R., & Tashakor, S. (2017). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on CSR Disclosure: An Analysis of Australian Firms. Australian Accounting Review, 27(4), 400-420.
- Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2021). The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 497-514.
- Badolato, P. G., Donelson, D. C., & Ege, M. (2014). Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 208-230.
- Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86.
- Bataineh, H., Alkurdi, A., Abuhommous, A. A., & Abdel Latif, M. (2023). The role of ownership structure, board, and audit committee in corporate social responsibility disclosure: Jordanian evidence. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research.
- Bose, S., Ali, M. J., Hossain, S., & Shamsuddin, A. (2022). Does CEO–Audit Committee/Board Interlocking Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 819-847.
- Buallay, A., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2019). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 249-264.
- Choi, S., Han, J., Jung, T., & Song, B. (2020). Audit committee members with CEO experience and the value of cash holdings. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(7), 897-926.
- Dwekat, A., Meqbel, R., Seguí-Mas, E., & Tormo-Carbó, G. (2022). The role of the audit committee in enhancing the credibility of CSR disclosure: Evidence from STOXX Europe 600 members. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(3), 718-740.
- Dwekat, A., Seguí-Mas, E., Tormo-Carbó, G., & Carmona, P. (2020). Corporate Governance Configurations and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Audit Committee and Board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2879-2892.
- Fahad, P., & Rahman, P. M. (2020). Impact of corporate governance on CSR disclosure. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 17(2-3), 155-167.
- Fallah, M. A., & Mojarrad, F. (2019). Corporate governance effects on corporate social responsibility disclosure: empirical evidence from heavy-pollution industries in Iran. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(2), 208-225.
- Garas, S., & ElMassah, S. (2018). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 14(1), 2-26.
- García-Sánchez, I., Frias-Aceituno, J. V., & Garcia-Rubio, R. (2012). Determining Factors of Audit Committee Attributes: Evidence from Spain. International Journal of Auditing, 16(2), 184-213.
- Handayati, P., Tham, Y. H., Yuningsih, Y., Rochayatun, S., & Meldona. (2022). Audit quality, corporate governance, firm characteristics and CSR disclosures – Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 33(3), 65-78.
- Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from the US Banking Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615.
- Kent, P., & Stewart, J. (2008). Corporate governance and disclosures on the transition to International Financial Reporting Standards. Accounting & Finance, 48(4), 649-671.
- Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 649-675.
- Mardawi, Z., Dwekat, A., Meqbel, R., & Carmona Ibáñez, P. (2023). Configurational analysis of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility reporting assurance: understanding the role of board and CSR committee. Meditari Accountancy Research.
- Musallam, S. R. M. (2018). The direct and indirect effect of the existence of risk management on the relationship between audit committee and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(9), 4125-4138.
- Pasko, O., Chen, F., Birchenko, N., & Ryzhikova, N. (2021). Corporate Governance Attributes and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from China. Studies in Business and Economics, 16(3), 173-189.
- Pasko, O., Chen, F., Tkal, Y., Hordiyenko, M., Nakisko, O., & Horkovenko, I. (2021). Do Converged to IFRS National Standards and Corporate Governance Attributes Affect Accounting Conservatism? Evidence from China. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 29(2).
- Pasko, O., Lagodiienko, N., Kudlaieva, N., Riabenko, L., & Gerasymenko, N. (2022). Does corporate governance moderate the effect of corporate social responsibility on a firm’s financial performance? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 588-601.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Bezverkhyi, K., Nikytenko, D., & Khromushyna, L. (2021). Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(4), 309-325.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Tkal, Y., Hordiyenko, M., Popova, L., & Abraham, Y. (2021). Can CSR Engagement and Strong Internal Control Enhance Sustainable Corporate Growth? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 15(3), 497-521.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Tuzhyk, K., Proskurina, N., & Gryn, V. (2021). Do sustainability reporting conduct and corporate governance attributes relate? Empirical evidence from China. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 110-123.
- Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2023). Corporate social responsibility commitment of women directors through audit committees: evidence from international firms. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 36(1), 98-118.
- Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Bel-Oms, I. (2021). Corporate social and environmental disclosure as a sustainable development tool provided by board sub-committees: Do women directors play a relevant moderating role? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3485-3501.
- Qaderi, S. A., Ghaleb, B. A. A., Hashed, A. A., Alhmoud, T. R., & Kamardin, H. (2023). Audit Committee Leadership Attributes and CSR Reporting: Evidence from Jordan. SAGE Open, 13(3).
- Ryu, H., Chae, S.-J., & Song, B. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility, Audit Committee Expertise, and Financial Reporting: Empirical Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 13(19), 10517.
- Song, B. (2021). The Joint Effects of Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Auditor Industrial Expertise on the Quality of Earnings. Global Business Finance Review, 26(3), 68-87.
- Song, B. (2022). The Influence of Audit-Committee Characteristics on the Association between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Quality. Sustainability, 14(17), 10496.
- Song, B., Choi, G. D., & Ryu, H. S. (2020). The Effect of the Characteristics of an Audit Committee on the Association between the Use of Prospector Strategy and Aggressive Earnings Management. Korean Accounting Review, 45(1), 173-206.
- Uyar, A., Elbardan, H., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2023). Audit and CSR committees: are they complements or substitutes in CSR reporting, assurance and GRI framework adoption? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(1), 1-36.
- Vafeas, N. (2005). Audit Committees, Boards, and the Quality of Reported Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 1093-1122.
- Velte, P. (2023). Which attributes of audit committees are most beneficial for European companies? Literature review and research recommendations. Journal of Global Responsibility, 14(4), 403-430.
- Wedari, L. K., & Shafadila, G. A. (2022). Factors Affecting Corporate Social Responsibility Web Disclosure: Evidence from the Consumer Sector in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(8), 2655-2667.
- Yekini, K., & Jallow, K. (2012). Corporate community involvement disclosures in annual report. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 7-32.
- Zaid, M. A. A., & Issa, A. (2023). A roadmap for triggering the convergence of global ESG disclosure standards: lessons from the IFRS foundation and stakeholder engagement. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(7), 1648-1669.
-
The role of accounting in sustainable development
Inna Makarenko ,
Alex Plastun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(2).2017.01
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 4-12 Views: 5783 Downloads: 4334 TO CITEIdeology of Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Goals influence the transformation of business processes in the companies. Professional accountants are important part of this transformation. In this paper the role of accounting in Sustainable Development Goals achievement is discussed. Different approaches to structuring the role of professional accountants in Sustainable Development are investigated. Among them are types of roles that perform accountants, their professional functions, skills and competencies in the corporate environment. As the result a holistic vision of the role of accounting in sustainable development in the new economic conditions is provided.
-
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Patrick Velte
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 4193 Downloads: 1616 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
-
Corporate governance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of selected multinational firms in Nigeria
Gideon Tayo Akinleye , Odunayo Olarewaju ,
Bamikole Samson Fajuyagbe
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 11-18 Views: 3141 Downloads: 519 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study focused on corporate governance and performance of selected Nigerian multinational firms from 2012 to 2016. Specifically, the study focused on the effect of board size, activism and committee activism on return on asset and firm growth rate. Secondary data collected from four multinational firms were analyzed via static panel estimation techniques. While board size and board activism exerted significant negative impact on return on asset, committee activism exerted insignificant impact. The results of the study further showed that board size and board activism exert insignificant negative impact on firm’s growth rate, while committee activism insignificantly spurs firm’s growth rate. Decisively, discoveries from this study reflect that corporate governance has significant negative impact on return on asset, but has insignificant influence on the growth rate of Nigerian multinational firms. Based on these findings, the authors recommended that corporate governance dynamics in firms world over should be reconsidered, such that it gives credence to more than just numbers of persons or meetings held, but the main reasons and deliberations in such meetings. It was also recommended that excessive increase in magnitude or frequency of meetings held by board of directors cum committee should be avoided.
