Conditional relation between return and co-moments – an empirical study for emerging Indian stock market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.24
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #2, pp. 308-319
- Cited by
- 895 Views
-
170 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Due to many theoretical and practical shortcomings of the traditional CAPM model, this study aims at analyzing the CAPM with possible extensions. The analysis aims to know the empirical soundness of Conditional Higher Moment CAPM in emerging India’s capital market. The sample consists of 69 company’s daily stock price data from April 2004 to March 2019 from NSE 100. Panel data analysis is used on 21 cross-sections. The overall results show that when both up and down markets are incorporated separately, all three moments, namely, co-variance, co-skewness, and co-kurtosis, are priced during the normal Indian economy phase. Further, this study states that including higher moments (co-skewness and co-kurtosis) in the two-moment model provides symmetry in both the up and down markets. This is one of the first studies in the Indian Stock market explaining the variation in portfolio returns through panel data analysis by extending CAPM with conditional higher-order co-moments. The portfolio managers should consider skewness and kurtosis along with variance in constructing the optimal portfolios.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G10, G11, G12, G14
-
References39
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Summary statistics of portfolio return distributions (first testing period – from April 2009 to March 2014)
- Table 2. Summary statistics of portfolio return distributions (second testing period – from April 2014 to March 2019)
- Table 3. Estimates of risk premium in conditional pricing models
- Table 4. Estimates of risk premium in conditional pricing models
- Table 5. Test for symmetry between co-moments and returns in up and down markets
-
- Amanullah, S., & Kamaiah, B. (1998). Asset Price Behavior in the Indian Stock Market: Is the CAPM still relevant. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 11(1), 32-47.
- Ansari, V. A. (2000). Capital asset pricing model: Should we stop using it? Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 25(1), 55-64.
- Balakrishnan, A. (2014). Multifactor Explanations of CAPM Anomalies: An Evidence for Indian Stock Market. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6, 337-366.
- Basu, D., & Chawla, D. (2010). An Empirical Test of CAPM – The Case of Indian Stock Market. Global Business Review, 11(2), 209-220.
- Chaudhary, C. A., Mishra, P., & Srivastava, S. (2018b). The Conditional Relation between Higher-Order Systematic Co-moments and Returns in Indian Equity Market. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 8(12), 121-147.
- Chaudhary, C. A., Mishra, P., & Srivastava, S. (2018a). The Conditional Relationship between Systematic Risk and Return in Indian Equity Market. International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering, 8(8), 107-119.
- Chaudhury, M. (2014). How Did the Financial Crisis Affect Daily Stock Returns? The Journal of Investing, 23(3), 65-84.
- Chung, P., Johnson, H., & Schill, M. (2006). Asset pricing when returns are non-normal: Fama-French factors versus higher-order systematic co-moments. Journal of Business, 79, 923-940.
- Dittmar, R. F. (2002). Nonlinear Pricing Kernels, Kurtosis Preference, and Evidence from the Cross-Section of Equity Returns. Journal of Finance, 57, 369-403.
- Fabozzi, F., & Francis, J. (1977). Stability Tests for Alphas and Betas over Bull and Bear Market Conditions. The Journal of Finance, 32, 1093-1099.
- Fama, E., & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636.
- Fang, H., & Lai, T. Y. (1997). Co‐kurtosis and capital asset pricing. Financial Review, 32(2), 293-307.
- Fletcher, J., & Kihanda, J. (2005). An examination of alternative CAPM-based models in UK stock returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(12), 2995-3014.
- Galagedera, D., Henry, D., & Silvapulle, P. (2003). Empirical Evidence on the Conditional Relation between Higher-Order Systematic Co-Moments and Security Returns. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 42(1/2), 121-137.
- Gupta, O. P., & Sehgal, S. (1993). An empirical testing of capital asset pricing model in India. Finance India, 7(4), 863-874.
- Harshita, Singh, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2015). Indian Stock Market and the Asset Pricing Models. Procedia Economics & Finance, 30, 294-304.
- Harvey, C. R., & Siddique, A. (2000). Time-varying conditional skewness and the market risk premium. Research in Banking and Finance, 1(1), 27-60.
- Hwang, S., & Satchell, S. (1999). Modelling emerging market risk premia using higher moments. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 4, 271-296.
- Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. (1976). Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. Journal of Finance, 31, 1085-1100.
- Levy, R. A. (1974). Beta coefficients as predictors of returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 30, 61-69.
- Lintner, J. (1965a). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
- Lintner, J. (1965b). Security Prices, Risk and Maximal Gains from Diversification. The Journal of Finance, 20(4), 587-615.
- Madhusoodanan, T. P. (1997). Risk and Return: A New Look at the Indian Stock Market. Finance India, 1(2), 285-304.
- Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica, 34(4), 768-783.
- Nguyen, D., & Puri, T. N. (2009). Higher-order systematic co-moments and asset pricing: New Evidence. Financial Review, 44(3), 345-369.
- Nimal, P., & Fernando, S. (2010). The conditional relation between beta and returns: evidence from Japan and Sri Lanka. Proceedings of International Research Conference on Management & Finance, 1, 178-188. Colombo.
- Pettengill, G., Sundaram, S., & Mathur, I. (1995). The Conditional relation between beta and returns. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30, 101-116.
- Richardson, M., & Smith, T. (1993). A test for multivariate normality in stock returns. Journal of Business, 66(2), 295-321.
- Rubinstein, M. (1973). The Fundamental Theorem of Parameter Preference Security Valuation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8(1), 61-69.
- Saji, T. G. (2014). Is CAPM dead in emerging market? Indian evidence. IUP Journal of Financial Risk Management, 11(3), 7-17.
- Salazar, J., & Lambert, A. (2010). Fama and Macbeth Revisited: A Critique. The IEB International Journal of Finance, 1, 48-71.
- Sehgal, S. (1997). An Empirical Testing of Three Parameter Capital Asset Pricing Model in India. Finance India, XI(4), 919-940.
- Sehgal, S., & Balakrishnan, A. (2013). Robustness of Fama-French Three Factor Model: FurtherEvidence for Indian Stock Market. The Journal of Business Perspective, 17, 119-127.
- Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442.
- Singh, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2015). Indian stock market and the asset pricing models. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 294-304.
- Teplova, T., & Shutova, E. (2011). A higher moment downside framework for conditional and unconditional CAPM in the Russian Stock Market. Eurasian Economic Review, 1, 157-177.
- Yalwar, Y. B. (1988). Bombay Stock Exchange: Rates of Return and Efficiency. Indian Economics Journal, 35(4), 68-121.
- Zhang, J., & Wihlborg, C. (2010). CAPM in Up and Down Markets: Evidence from Six European Emerging Markets. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 9(2), 229-255.
- Zhou, B. (1996). High-frequency data and volatility in foreign-exchange rates. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14(1), 45-52.