The effect of IFRS adoption on the value relevance of accounting information: evidence from South Korea
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.07
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2019, Issue #2, pp. 78-88
- Cited by
- 1826 Views
-
296 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates whether the value relevance of accounting information was changed after IFRS adoption in South Korea. Related prior studies have found mixed empirical evidence depending on research methodologies or research periods. Moreover, the effect of IFRS adoption on value relevance can be different between Korean stock markets (KSE and KOSDAQ) because they have different characteristics. Also, the main financial statements reported by Korean firms had changed from individual financial statements to consolidated financial statements after IFRS adoption. Thus, this study analyzes the effect of IFRS adoption on the value relevance of individual and consolidated accounting numbers expanding research periods (5 years before and after IFRS adoption) and comparing changes in explanatory powers of Ohlson (1995) model on each listing market. The empirical results indicate that the value relevance of Korean listed firms generally decreased after IFRS adoption. However, the value relevance of KSE listed firms decreased, while the value relevance of KOSDAQ listed firms increased after IFRS adoption. In addition, it was found that the effects of IFRS adoption on value relevance of individual and consolidated financial information were different depending on listed markets. This implies that different level of demand for information environment may induce differential effects of IFRS adoption on value relevance.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41
-
References23
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics (n = 14,260)
- Table 2. Pearson & Spearman Correlation Matrix (n = 14,260)
- Table 3. Test results of hypothesis using pooled OLS model (Equation (1))
- Table 4. Test results of hypothesis using fixed industry effect model (Equation (2))
- Table 5. Annual time-series trends of adjusted R2 by listing market
-
- Ahmed, S. A., Neel, M., & Wang, D. (2013). Does Mandatory Adoption of IFRS Improve Accounting Quality? Preliminary Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1344-1372.
- Barth, M., Landsman, W., & Lang, M. (2008). International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 467-98.
- Capkun, V., Collins, D., & Jeanjean, T. (2016). The Effect of IAS/IFRS Adoption on Earnings Management (Smoothing): A Closer Look at Competing Explanations. Journal of Accounting and public Policy, 35(4), 352-394.
- Choi, J. H. (2013). The Adoption of IFRS and Value Relevance of Accounting Information. Korean Accounting Review, 38(1), 391-424 [printed in Korean].
- Choi, J. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Baek, J. H. (2010). Earnings Management around Initial Public Offerings in KOSDAQ Market Associated with Managerial Opportunism. Korean Accounting Research, 35(3), 37-80 [printed in Korean].
- Choi, S. H., Kim, I. S., & Choi, K. (2013). The Effect of Mandatory K-IFRS Adoption: Value Relevance and Market Reaction to K-IFRS Reconciliation Adjustments. Korean Accounting Review, 38(4), 333-367 [printed in Korean].
- Clarkson, P., Hanna, J. D., Richardson, G. D., & Thompson, R. (2011). The Impact of IFRS Adoption on the Value Relevance of Book Value and Earnings. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 7(1), 1-17.
- Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2008). Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1085-1142.
- Horton, J., & Serafeim, G. (2010). Market Reaction to and Valuation of IFRS Reconciliation Adjustments: First Evidence from the UK. Review of Accounting Studies, 15, 725-751.
- Horton, J., Serafeim, G., & Serafeim, I. (2013). Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Environment? Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 388-423.
- Hung, M., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2007). Financial Statement Effects of Adopting International Accounting Standards: The Case of Germany. Review of Accounting Studies, 12(4), 623-657.
- Ji, H. M. (2013). The Effect of the Adoption of K-IFRS on Value Relevance of Financial Information. Accounting Information Review, 31(2), 163-185 [printed in Korean].
- Kargin, S. (2013). The Impact of IFRS on the Value Relevance of Accounting Information: Evidence from Turkish Firms. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(4), 71-80.
- Kim, Y., & Kim, K. (2015). Short-Term and Long-Term Changes in the Value Relevance of the K-IFRS Adoption. Korean accounting Review, 40(4), 111-140 [printed in Korean].
- Kwon, G. J. (2018). Changes in the Value Relevance of Accounting Information before and after The Adoption of K-IFRS: Evidence from Korea. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(1), 65-84.
- Kwon, S. Y., Na, K., & Park, J. (2017). The Economic Effects of IFRS Adoption in Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24(1-2). 1-41.
- Leuz, C. (2003). IAS versus U.S. GAAP: Information-asymmetry Based Evidence from Germany’s New Market. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(3), 445-72.
- Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
- Okafor, O., Anderson, M., & Warsame, H. (2016). IFRS and Value Relevance: Evidence Based on Canadian Adoption. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(2), 136-160.
- Park, K. (2016). IFRS Adoption and Value Relevance of Accounting Information. Accounting Information Review, 34(2), 474-499 [printed in Korean].
- Suadiye, G. (2012). Value Relevance of Book Value & Earnings Under the Local GAAP and IFRS: Evidence from Turkey. Ege Academic Review, 12(3), 301-310.
- Yip, R., & Young, D. (2012). Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767-1789.
- Yoon, S. S. (2001). A Comparison of Earnings Management between KSE Firms and KOSDAQ Firms. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 29(1), 57-85.