The mechanism of higher education funding in Ukraine: nationwide and local perspective
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.19
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2018, Issue #3, pp. 223-236
- Cited by
- 1060 Views
-
204 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Despite positive transformations in higher education in Ukraine since 2014 when a new Law was introduced, the system of public funding still remains a highly centralized and strongly budgetary dependent based on the state planning methods, which in the situation of lack of resources becomes more imbalanced and inefficient.
The current system of allocation of the “state order for training the specialists with higher education” does not ensure an equal and fair competition among top 10 universities and the rest, especially regional, and the system cannot guarantee state-funded places to all applicants with high results of the External Independent Testing exams. At the same time, only a small share of graduates work on the specialty they acquired. The situation on the labor market does not encourage graduates to be employed in public institutions, which is harmful for the public sector of economy, especially in the regions. It proves that the system of distribution and allocation of government funding between higher education institutions in Ukraine needs urgent reforming.
The objective is to analyze the current system of higher education funding in Ukraine in its national dimension and local perspective, and to develop proposals for its improvement, considering the selected good practices and using the following methods: literature analysis, method of retrospective analysis to research budgetary expenditures, determining the Net Present Value for calculating the government cost. Finally, a feasible proposal to reform the mechanism of public higher education funding was developed.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I22
-
References37
-
Tables4
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Variety of public funding allocation mechanisms
- Figure 2. The enrolment and graduation numbers In Higher Educational Institutions in Ukraine during the period 2012–2017
- Figure 3. State order for HEIs of Dnipro for educational level “Bachelor” in full-time and part-time forms of education in the period 2016–2017
- Figure 4. Mechanism of public higher education funding in Ukraine: authors’ proposal
-
- Table 1. The dynamics of budget expenditures on higher education in the period 2012–2017
- Table 2. The cost of a state-funded place per single applicant of educational level “Bachelor” (funding per 1 student)
- Table 3. Initial data for calculating the cost of using target preferential state loan
- Table 4. The cost of education per a single bachelor student if target state preferential loan is granted
-
- Act on Higher Education and Science, The Law of Republic of Poland on July 20, 2018.
- Athena (2015). University Autonomy in Ukraine: Analysis & Roadmap 2012–2015.
- Bagmet, M., & Liakhovets, O. (2017). Towards the European Union’s Education Standards: Expectations of the Ukrainians. Economics and Sociology, 10(2), 191-206.
- Carton, G., McMillan, C., & Overall, J. (2018). Strategic capacities in US universities – the role of business schools as institutional builders. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 186-198.
- Cohen, E., Davidovitch, N. (2015). Higher education between government policy and free market forces: The case of Israel. Economics and Sociology, 8(1), 258-274.
- Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. On Approval of the Procedure for Granting the Target State Loan for Higher Education (2003, June 16).
- Estermann, T., & Pruvot, E. B. (2011). Financially Sustainable Universities II. Brussels: European University Association.
- Eurydice (2008). Higher education governance in Europe. Policies, structures, funding and academic staff. Brussels: Eurydice, European Commission, Education and Culture DG.
- Federal Student Aid (n.d.). Public Service Loan Forgiveness.
- Guille, M. (2002). Students Loans in Europe An Overview. European Journal of Education, 37(4), 417-431.
- Human Development Statistical Tables - 2016. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/data
- Jongbloed, B. (2004). Funding Higher Education: options, trade-offs and dilemmas (Paper for Fulbright Brainstorms – New Trends in Higher Education). CHEPS. Netherlands: University of Twente.
- Kwiek, M. (2006). The University and the State: A Study into Global Transformations (424 p.). Peter Lang Publishing.
- Lepori, B. (2007). Funding Models of Swiss Universities of Applied Sciences. International Experiences and Options for the Swiss case (Report on behalf of the Rector’s Conference of Swiss Universities of Applied Sciences).
- Nikolayev, Ye. B. (2017). Higher Education in Ukraine: Agenda for reforms (KAS Policy Paper). Кyiv: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Ukraine Office.
- O’Leary, S. (2015). The Role of Enterprise and Entrepreneurship within Higher Education and Effective Economic Governance across Central and Eastern Europe. Economics and Sociology, 8(2), 143-153.
- Pruvot, E. B., Claeys-Kulik, A. L., & Estermann, T. (2015). Strate¬gies for Efficient Funding of Universities in Europe. In The European Higher Education Area (pp. 153-168).
- Rybchanska, Kh. (2016). Assessment of financial leverage for higher education. Finance, accounting, banks, 1, 276-287.
- Salmi, J. (2003). Student Loans in an International Perspective: The World Bank Experience (LCSHD paper series No. 44). Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Satsyk, V. (2014). Детерминанты глобальной конкурентоспособности университетов: в поисках эффективной стратегии развития высшего образования на Украине [Determinanty globalnoy konkurentosposobnosti universitetov: v poiskakh effektivnoy strategii razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya na Ukraine]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 1, 134-161.
- Savchenko, I., & Chumak, O. (2017). Modernization of the state mechanism of higher education finding. In Theory and practice of public administration: collection of scientific articles (pp. 56-72). Kharkiv Regional Institute of Public Administration.
- Shevchuk, A. (2014). Use of foreign experience to manage the development of regional educational systems in Ukraine. Problems of the economy, 3, 164-170.
- Soobramoney Penceliah, Samkele V. M. Konyana, & Mandusha Maharaj (2016). The choice of public universities in a restructured and transforming Higher Education landscape: a student perspective. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(3-1), p. 276- 282.
- Stadny, Y. (2016). Conceptual Model of Performance-Based Funding of Higher Education Institutions in Ukraine.
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Consumer price index (2012−2017).
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Higher educational institutions (2012−2017).
- State Treasury Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Expenditures on the program classification of expenditures and lending of the state budget.
- The European University Association (2018). Public Funding Observatory.
- The Global Human Capital Report - 2017.
- The law of Ukraine. On Civil Service (2015, December 10).
- The law of Ukraine. On Higher Education (2014, July 01).
- The Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine (2018). The Ministry of Economic Development has proposed to change the mechanism of the state order for the current and next academic year.
- The World Bank (2018). New country classifications by income level: 2018–2019.
- Velychko, O., & Velychko, L. (2018). Matrix structures in management of quality of educational and scientific work of Ukrainian universities. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 133-144.
- Woźnicki, J. (2017). Postulat selektywnego charakteru deregulacji w szkolnictwie wyższym. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 2(50), p. 91-105.
- Woźnicki, J. (Ed.) (2013). Financing and Deregulation in Higher Education. Warsaw: Institute of Knowledge Society.
- Zatonatska, T. (2012). Зарубіжний досвід фінансування розвитку освіти: перспективи застосування в Україні [Zarubiznhyi dosvid finansuvannia rozvytku osvity: perspektyvy zastosuvannia v Ukraini]. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University. Economy, 139, 36-39.