The likelihood value of residual risk estimation in the management of enterprise risk

  • Received April 24, 2018;
    Accepted June 26, 2018;
    Published July 13, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Ronny Kountur
    ORCID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.04
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2018, Issue #3, pp. 49-55
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    1 articles
  • 2018 Views
  • 403 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

A model for estimating the likelihood value of residual risk (Y) is introduced. The model consists of three independent variables: the likelihood value of risk before risk treatment (X1), the quality of risk treatment (X2), and the appropriateness of risk treatment (X3). An experimental research design with a multiple linear regression analysis was used in the estimation. All independent variables, the likelihood value of risk before treatment, the quality of risk treatment, and the appropriateness of risk treatment, can be significantly used to estimate the likelihood value of residual risk. Since no model of estimating residual risk of likelihood had been introduced yet, the findings of this study provide significant contribution to firms or organizations that need to assess the likelihood value of residual risks.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Normal P-P plot: residual probability
    • Figure 2. Scatterplot dependent variable: residual probability
    • Table 1. The quality of risk treatment
    • Table 2. The appropriateness of risk treatment
    • Table 3. Collinearity statistics
    • Abdelrafe, E., & Hussin, B. (2011). Estimating quality-affecting risks in software projects. The International Management Review, 7(2), 66-74.
    • Anton, T., Lackes, R., & Siepermann, M. (2015). Integration of risk aspects into business process modeling. Paper presented at 4th International Conference on Enterprise Resource Planning, ERP Future 2015, 16-17 November.
    • Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 659-675.
    • Aven, T. (2011). On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 96(7), 719-726.
    • Bharathy, G. K., & McShane, M. K. (2014). Applying a system model to enterprise risk management. Engineering Management Journal, 26(4), 38-46.
    • Bowling, D. M., & Rieger, L. (2005). Success factors for implementing enterprise risk management: building on the COSO framework for enterprise risk management to reduce overall risk. Bank Accounting & Finance, Apr-May, 21.
    • Colombini, F. (2015). Risk, regulation, supervision and crises in the European Banking Union. Law and Economics Yearly Review, 4(2), 236-273.
    • Cope, E. W., Kuster, J. M., Etzweiler, D., Deleris L. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Incorporating risk into business process models. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(3).
    • Everson, M. E. A., & Chesley, D. L. (June 2016). Aligning risk with strategy and performance: Executive summary.
    • Farrell, M., & Gallagher, R. (2015). The valuation implications of enterprise risk management maturity. Journal of Risk & Insurance, 82(3), 625-657.
    • Gatzert, N., & Martin, M. (2015). Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: Empirical evidence from the literature. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 18(1), 29-53.
    • Gjerdrum, D., & Peter, M. (2011). The New International Standard on the Practice of Risk Management – A Comparison of ISO 31000:2009 and the COSO ERM Framework. Society of Actuaries, 12, 8-12.
    • Hakizabera, A. U., & Ohsato, A. (2010). Early risk assessment in software development life cycle using software metrics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management & Evaluation, 122-128.
    • Kountur, R. (2016). Asesmen Risiko Terintegrasi: Quantitative Approach. Jakarta: PT RAP Indonesia.
    • Lambert, J. H., Jennings, R. K., & Joshi, N. N. (2006). Integration of risk identification with business process model. System Engineering, 9(3), 187-198.
    • Lundqvist, S. A. (2014). An exploratory study of enterprise risk Management: Pillars of ERM. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(3), 393-429.
    • Mitchell, C., Bauknecht, D., & Connor, P. M. (2006). Effectiveness through risk reduction: A comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energy Policy, 34(3), 297-305.
    • Nocco, B. W., & Stulz, R. M. (2006). Enterprise risk management: Theory and practice. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(4), 8-20.
    • Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004). Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 434-456.
    • Salmela, H. H. S. (2008). Analyzing business losses caused by information systems risk: a business process analysis approach. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 185-202.
    • Suriadi, S. et al. (2014). Current research in risk-aware business process management-overview, comparison, and gap analysis. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 933-984.
    • Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77-105.
    • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
    • Taylor, A., Artman, E., & Woelfer, J. P. (2012). Information technology project risk management: bridging the gap between research and practice. Journal of Information Technology, 27(1), 17-34.
    • Tolbert, G. D. (2005). Residual risk reduction: Systematically deciding what is “safe”. Professional Safety.
    • Williamson, D. (2007). The COSO ERM framework: a critique from system theory of management control. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 7(8), 1089-1119.
Related Articles

  • The mediating effect of job satisfaction on health and safety policy management and employee productivity in manufacturing firms

    Morgan Morgan O.ORCID , Winifred EmuORCID , Christian AmadiORCID , Emmanuel E. OkonORCID , Paul NjamaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.09
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021         Issue #2         pp. 104-117 Views: 1189 Downloads: 1073 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The study investigated the mediating effect of job satisfaction on health and safety policy management and employee productivity in manufacturing firms in Nigeria. For the study, a quantitative analytical method was adopted, including a descriptive survey. To obtain data for the study, a questionnaire instrument was constructed and distributed among 950 sampled respondents in selected manufacturing firms in Nigeria. The descriptive statistics was deployed in the data analysis, while the multiple regression analysis was used to test the study hypotheses at the 0.05 level of significance. The mediating effect of job satisfaction on health and safety policy management and employee productivity relationship was confirmed using the Sobel test with the aid of MedGraph. The results showed that hazard prevention and control policy have a significant positive effect on employee productivity. Risk assessment policy have a significant positive effect on employee productivity. Also, job satisfaction has a significant positive mediating effect on the health and safety policy management and employee productivity relationship. Therefore, manufacturing firms should take appropriate measures to prevent and control hazards and provide effective risk assessments to improve health and safety policy management.

    Acknowledgments
    The authors express gratitude to anonymous reviewers, the journal editor and all the authors whose work were used in this study. The authors are grateful to the management of manufacturing firms included in the study for having given approval for the administration of the questionnaire instrument, and the survey respondents for providing their views on the issues raised in the questionnaire instrument on health and safety policy management (hazard prevention and control policy and risk assessment policy), employee productivity and job satisfaction.

  • The effectiveness of the internal control system in Vietnamese credit institutions

    Tran Quoc ThinhORCID , Ly Hoang AnhORCID , Nguyen Khanh TuanORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(4).2020.03
    Banks and Bank Systems Volume 15, 2020         Issue #4         pp. 26-35 Views: 1160 Downloads: 522 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    In the context of global economic integration, there are many opportunities for promoting economic development, but there are also challenges of complexity and risk in business activities. This always raises many questions that need to be resolved for credit institutions. The internal control system of credit institutions has become increasingly important for the sustainable development of the national financial system. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of the internal control system in the practical application of Vietnamese credit institutions. Descriptive statistics are applied to analyze data using SPSS software. The structured questionnaire is designed to collect objective opinions and purposive sampling techniques among 382 experts who are managers of credit institutions in 2020. The results show that all five components improve the effectiveness of the internal control system, and the internal control system plays a role in the safety of Vietnamese credit institutions. Thus, the Central Bank of Vietnam should improve the legal framework and related internal control provisions for credit institutions in accordance with international principles to improve the effectiveness of the internal control system.

  • Enterprise risk-based management disclosures and firm value of Indonesian finance companies

    Enni SavitriORCID , Tatang Ary GumantiORCID , Nelly Yulinda doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.33
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020         Issue #4         pp. 414-422 Views: 957 Downloads: 303 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Rapid changes in business transactions and technology development have made risk-based management a significant issue for business entities. The ability in managing risk would lead to a better firm value. This study investigates the effect of enterprise risk-based management disclosures (ERMD) and intellectual capital (IC) on firm value. It also tests the moderating effect of profitability on the relationship ERMD and IC with firm value. It examines the annual reports of 49 finance firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The data cover three years, from 2016 to 2018. It employs panel data regression to test the hypotheses. The results show that the effect of ERMD and IC on firm value is partially and positively moderated by profitability. The findings show that the application of ERDM and IC can increase firm value. The originality of this study is that profitability can moderate the effect of ERMD and IC on firm value. The increase of ERMD and IC management within the company must be balanced with profitability to raise capital from outside the company to increase firm value.

    Acknowledgment
    The Research was conducted with the support of the Universitas Riau, Indonesia.

Download Preview
Close
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations