Institutional adaptation to abrupt changes during and following the financial crisis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.14
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2018, Issue #1, pp. 154-165
- 1344 Views
-
302 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The aim of the study is to investigate substantial bases and mechanisms for institutional changes that facilitate the adjustment of an economic system to abrupt changes. To achieve this objective, comparative analysis is carried out in order to disclose different approaches to crisis management and resolution regimes following the financial imbalances in Denmark, Sweden, and the USA that represent three different models of institutional adaptation. Thus, the paper reflects on the multifaceted phenomenon of institutional change, evaluating the theoretical background, which is further adjusted to the concept of institutional adaptation. In turn, the concept of institutional adaptation is developed from crisis management and post-crisis financial policies’ perspective. Built on various resolution procedures, the main mechanisms behind institutional adaptation are highlighted: extension (extended authorities of traditional institutions that have been empowered with additional functions); limited creation (newly-created institutions with restricted opportunity to exercise their discretion); redeployment (utilized and redeployed traditional effective institutions in order to implement new resolution schemes); modified formation (newly-formed institutions that have been modified and adjusted); grafting (grafting the new appropriate elements onto statutory institutional frameworks); transfer (transfer of practices from other domains and markets), and rebuilding (rebuilding functional competences). It is proved that even though policy-makers draw on institutions and logic of actions originally established and developed before the need to respond to new circumstances, they adjust and redesign them to fit and produce a renewed action plan.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)B52, G28, N20
-
References43
-
Tables0
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. The logic of institutional adaptation through concerted institutional change
- Figure 2. Real GDP in Sweden, Denmark, and the United States
-
- Allen, W., Moessner, R. (2010). Central Bank Cooperation and International Liquidity in the Financial Crisis of 2008-9 (BIS Working Papers, No. 310, June). Basel: Bank for International Settlements, Basel.
- Amable, B. (2003). The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Andersen, A. L., Duus, C., Jensen, T. L. (2014). Household Debt and Consumption During the Financial Crisis: Evidence from Danish Micro Data (Danmarks Nationalbank Working Papers, No. 2014- 89). Danmarks Nationalbank, Copenhagen.
- Baily, M. N., Klein, A., Schardinc, J. (2017). The Impact of the Dodd- Frank Act on Financial Stability and Economic Growth. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(1), 20-47.
- Bell, S. (2011). Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883-906.
- Bloomberg (2011). Amagerbanken Senior Bondholders to Suffer Losses. Bloomberg, 7 February.
- Boije, R., Kainelainen, A. (2012). The Importance of Fiscal Policy Frameworks – Swedish Experience of the Crisis. In Rules and Institutions for Sound Fiscal Policy after the Crisis: Workshops and Conferences (pp. 321-342). Roma: Banca d’Italia.
- Bryant, R. C., Henderson, D. W., Becker, T. (2012). Maintaining Financial Stability in An Open Economy: Sweden in the Global Crisis and Beyond. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
- Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Campbell, J. L. (2011). The US Financial Crisis: Lessons for Theories of Institutional Complementarity. Socio-Economic Review, 9(2), 211-234.
- Campbell, J. L., Pedersen, O. K. (2007). The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success: Denmark in the Global Economy. Comparative Political Studies, 40(3), 307-332.
- Campbell, J. L., Hall, J. (2014). Small states, Nationalism and Institutional Capacities: The Paradox of the Danish and Irish Responses to the Financial Crisis (Working Paper No. 87). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
- Carr, E. (2009). A Special Report on the Future of Finance. The Economist, January 25, 1-21.
- Carstensen, M. B. (2013). Projecting from a Fiction: The Case of Financial Crisis in Denmark. New Political Economy, 18(4), 555-578.
- Carstensen, M. B. (2013). The Role of Special Resolution Regimes in Post-Crisis Financial Regulation: Four Danish Lessons. Politik, 16(4), 44-51.
- Carstensen, M. B. (2017). Institutional Bricolage in Times of Crisis. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 139-160.
- Crouch, C. (2005). Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Crouch, C. (2015). Governing Social Risks in Post-Crisis Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
- Deeg, R., Jackson, G. (2012). The Long-Term Trajectories of Institutional Change in European Capitalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(8), 1109-1125.
- Financial Stability Board (FSB) (2013). Thematic Review on Resolution Regimes: Peer Review Report, April 13.
- Hansen, Niels-Jakob H., Welz, P. (2011). Interest Rate Pass-through During the Global Financial Crisis. The Case of Sweden (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 855). OECD Publishing, Paris.
- Howlett, M., Migone, A. (2011). Charles Lindblom is Alive and Well and Living in Punctuated Equilibrium Land. Policy and Society, 30, 53-62.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2014). Denmark: Financial Sector Assessment Program: Crisis Management, Bank Resolution, and Financial Sector Safety Nets – Technical Note (IMF Country Report No. 14/351). International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.
- Jockem, S. (2010). Sweden Country Report. Managing the Crisis: A Comparative Assessment of Economic Governance in 14 Economies. Gutersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
- Katalina, M., Bianco, J. D. (2013). Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Evolution of a New Agency with Emerging Regulatory Framework. Wolters Kluwer.
- Klein, A. (2017). A Primer on Dodd-Frank’s Orderly Liquidation Authority. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, June.
- Lavelle, K. C. (2013). Money and Banks in the American Political System. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Mahoney, J., Thelen, K. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change, In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Marinc, M., Vlahu, R. (2012). The Economics of Bank Bankruptcy Law. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
- Mattli, W., Woods, N. (2009). The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Meyer, J. W., Frank, D. J., Hironaka, A., Schofer, E., Tuma, N. B. (1997). The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870- 1990. International Organization, 51(4), 623-651.
- Miller, A. T., Holmes, K. R., Kim, A. B., Riley, B., Roberts, J. M., Walsh, K. (2011). 2011 Index of Economic Freedom. The Heritage Foundation. The Wall Street Journal.
- Minegishi, M., Cournède, B. (2010). Monetary Policy Responses to the Crisis and Exit Strategies (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 753). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2015). OECD Economic Surveys: Sweden 2015. OECD Publishing.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2016). OECD Economic Surveys: Denmark 2016. OECD Publishing.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2016). OECD Economic Surveys: USA 2016. OECD Publishing.
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2017). OECD Economic Surveys: Sweden 2017. OECD Publishing.
- Schich, S., Kim, Byoung-Hwan (2010). Systemic Financial Crisis: How to Fund Resolution. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends.
- Streeck, W., Thelen, K. (Eds). (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 1-39). NY: Oxford University Press.
- Wanna, J., Lindquist, E. A., de Vries J. (2015). The Global Financial Crisis and its Budget Impacts in OECD Nations: Fiscal Responses and Future Challenges. Cheltenham: UK Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
- Woll, C. (2014). The Power of Collective Inaction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Woolley, J. T., Ziegler, J. N. (2012). The Two-tiered Politics of Financial Reform in the United States. In R. Mayntz (Ed.), Institutional Change in the Regulation of Financial Markets (pp. 27-63). Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.