Identifying explosive behavioral trace in the CNX Nifty Index: a quantum finance approach
-
Received December 28, 2017;Accepted February 19, 2018;Published March 3, 2018
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0686-7046Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5665-640X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.18
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2018, Issue #1, pp. 208-223
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by8 articlesJournal title: SSRN Electronic JournalArticle title: Econophysics ReviewsDOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3338434Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year: 2019Contributors: Bikramaditya Ghosh, Krishna M CJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title: Investment Management and Financial InnovationsArticle title: Predictability and herding of bourse volatility: an econophysics analogueDOI: 10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.28Volume: 15 / Issue: 2 / First page: 317 / Year: 2018Contributors: Bikramaditya Ghosh, Krishna M.C., Shrikanth Rao, Emira Kozarević, Rahul Kumar PandeyJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title: Applied Artificial IntelligenceArticle title: Research on Financial Field Integrating Artificial Intelligence: Application Basis, Case Analysis, and SVR Model-Based OvernightDOI: 10.1080/08839514.2023.2222258Volume: 37 / Issue: 1 / First page: / Year: 2023Contributors: Xinzhu YanJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title: Journal of Central Banking Theory and PracticeArticle title: Econophysical bourse volatility – Global EvidenceDOI: 10.2478/jcbtp-2020-0015Volume: 9 / Issue: 2 / First page: 87 / Year: 2020Contributors: Bikramaditya Ghosh, Krishna MC
- 2181 Views
-
5431 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The financial markets are found to be finite Hilbert space, inside which the stocks are displaying their wave-particle duality. The Reynolds number, an age old fluid mechanics theory, has been redefined in investment finance domain to identify possible explosive moments in the stock exchange. CNX Nifty Index, a known index on the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., has been put to the test under this situation. The Reynolds number (its financial version) has been predicted, as well as connected with plausible behavioral rationale. While predicting, both econometric and machine-learning approaches have been put into use. The primary objective of this paper is to set up an efficient econophysics’ proxy for stock exchange explosion. The secondary objective of the paper is to predict the Reynolds number for the future. Last but not least, this paper aims to trace back the behavioral links as well.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G1, G02, C45
-
References39
-
Tables8
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. The Reynolds number over a period of 16 years, clearly coming down in amplitude and frequency
- Figure 2. The Reynolds number is plotted with CNX Nifty and the volatility indicator CBOE VIX in the second zone (2007 to 2011); local maxima is observed at higher levels of CNX Nifty
- Figure 3. The Reynolds number is plotted with CNX Nifty and the volatility indicator CBOE VIX in the second and third zone combined (2007 to 2015); local minimum is observed at higher levels of CNX Nifty
- Figure 4. GARCH forecasting of the Reynolds number in Nifty
-
- Table 1. The augmented Dickey-Fuller test
- Table 2. Robustness measures
- Table 3. Martingale test
- Table 4. Individual tests
- Table 5. Lag equation
- Table 6. Variance equation
- Table 7. Neural network output
- Table 8. Comparative intercepts of GARCH and neural network
-
- Arms, R. W. (1996). Trading without Fear (1st ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Ausloos, M., Jovanovic, F., & Schinckus, C. (2016). On the “usual” misunderstandings between econophysics and finance: Some clarifications on modelling approaches and efficient market hypothesis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 47, 7-14.
- Bachelier, L. (1900). Th’eorie de la sp’eculation. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup, 17, 21-86.
- Bentes, S. R., & Menezes, R. (2012). Entropy: A new measure of stock market volatility? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 394(1).
- Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. In M. Jordan, M., Kleinberg, J. & Schölkopf, B. (Eds.), Information Science and Statistics (1st ed.). New Jersey: Springer-Verlag.
- Bloomberg. (2013, May). U.S. 10- Year Yield Tops 2% as Bernanke Says Fed May Taper Buys. Bloomberg.
- Bouchaud, J.-P., & Sornette, D. (1994). The Black-Scholes option pricing problem in mathematical finance: generalization and extensions for a large class of stochastic processes. Journal de Physique I, 4, 863-881.
- Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex Optimization. London: Cambridge University Press.
- BSE (2003). BSE Business Review 2002–03. Mumbai.
- Cotfas, L.-A. (2013). A quantum mechanical model for the rate of return. Romanian Reports in Physics, 65(2), 327-333.
- Dorsey, D. (1993). The Relative Volatility Index. Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities, 13, June.
- Duan, J.-C. (1995). GARCH and Stochastic Volatility Option Pricing. Mathematical Finance, 5(1), 13-32.
- Economic Times (2005, July). Sensex at new peak as FIIs flood market. Mumbai.
- Economic Times (2009, July 9). Satyam scam an aberration, new Companies Bill soon: Govt Business Standard.
- Eric, D., Andjelic, G., & Redzepagic, S. (2009). Application of MACD and RVI indicators as functions of investment strategy optimization on the financial market. Zb. rad. Ekon. fak. Rij., 27, 171-196.
- Ghosh, B. (2016). Rational Bubble Testing: An in-depth Study on CNX Nifty. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, 6(6), 10-16.
- Haven, E. (2002). A discussion on embedding the Black-Scholes option pricing model in a quantum physics setting. Physica A, 304, 507-524.
- Herwartz, H. (2017). Stock return prediction under GARCH − An empirical assessment. International Journal of Forecasting, 33, 569-580.
- Ilinski, K. (2001). Physics of Finance: Gauge Modelling in Non- Equilibrium Pricing (1st ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Jakimowicz, A., & Juzwiszyn, J. (2012). Vortex Stabilization of Market Equilibrium in Theory and in Practice of Economics. Acta Physica Polonica A, 121(2), 54-60.
- Jakimowicz, A., & Juzwiszyn, J. (2015). Balance in the turbulent world of economy. Acta Physica Polonica A, 127(3), A78-A85.
- Jovanovic, F. (2012). Bachelier: Not the forgotten forerunner he has been depicted as. An analysis of the dissemination of Louis Bachelier’s work in economics. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(3), 431-451.
- Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts: A Cognitive Perspective on Risk Taking. Management Science, 39(1), 17-31.
- Los, C. A. (2004). Measuring Financial Cash Flow and Term Structure Dynamics. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Mandelbrot, B., & Hudson, R. L. (2004). Misbehavior of markets. Basic Books.
- Mantegna, R. N., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). An Introduction to Econophysics − Correlations and Complexity in Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Matías, J. M., Febrero-Bande, M., González-Manteiga, W., & Reboredo, J. C. (2010). Boosting GARCH and neural networks for the prediction of heteroskedastic time series. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 51, 256- 271.
- McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115-133.
- Olanipekun, A. J., Michael, A. A., & Oluwaseun, A. (2012). Application of Newton Raphson Method To a Finite Barrier Quantum Well (FBQW) System. IJRRAS, 13, 88-92.
- Pathak, B. (2011). The Indian Financial System: Markets, Institutions and Services (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Pearson India.
- Racorean, O. (2015). Quantum Gates and Quantum Circuits of Stock Portfolio, 41.
- Reynolds, O. (1883). An Experimental Investigation of the Circumstances Which Determine Whether the Motion of Water Shall Be Direct or Sinuous, and of the Law of Resistance in Parallel Channels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 174, 935-982.
- Reynolds, O. (1901). Papers on Mechanical and Physical Subjects. Reprinted from Various Transactions and Journals, 2, 1881- 1900.
- Ritter, J. R. (2003). Behavioral finance. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 11(4), 429-437.
- Samuelson, P. (1965). Proof That Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly. Industrial Management Review, 6(2).
- Schaden, M. (2002). Quantum finance. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 316(1-4), 511-538.
- Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational Exuberance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Sornette, D. (2003). Why Stock Markets Crash, Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Zhang, C., & Huang, L. (2010). A quantum model for the stock market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389(24), 5769-5775.
-
Influence of news on rational decision making by financial market investors
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #3 pp. 142-156 Views: 2423 Downloads: 430 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe impact of news on individual investor decision is explicit as investors need to update, adapt and forecast returns with constraints of time, uncertainty and resources to be successful. The aim is to understand and review the influence of news on individual investor’s decision making in stock markets and identify the impact of different type of news on individual investor’s decision making in stock markets, assess the behavioral reaction and investment decisions made by investors before and after there is news item, identify the linking effect on behavioral theories and biases, develop a generalized decision making conceptual model to understand the impact of news on investor’s reaction, decision and its linkages along with the behavioral bias. Theoretical basis/methodology for processing of news by investors is assumed to be based on Broadbent’s filter theory (1958) and due to cognitive informational inefficiency of investors it assesses the attention and the investor’s reaction of overreaction and underreaction, which do not comply with efficient market hypothesis theory. The reasons for its noncompliance are found by relating it with behavioral theories. The results explain how investor screens with filters and give attention to news only when it affects their portfolio or investment objective and strategies. It is concluded that investor’s decision making depends on degree of information penetration, information content, information influence, specific internal factors and generic external and on investors prevailing at that given circumstances. This gives us the solution to comprehend the investor’s reaction, decision and unresolved reversals, short- and long-term overreaction.
-
Predictability and herding of bourse volatility: an econophysics analogue
Bikramaditya Ghosh , Krishna M.C. , Shrikanth Rao , Emira Kozarević , Rahul Kumar Pandey doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.28Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 317-326 Views: 2069 Downloads: 216 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯFinancial Reynolds number works as a proxy for volatility in stock markets. This piece of work helps to identify the predictability and herd behavior embedded in the financial Reynolds number (time series) series for both CNX Nifty Regular and CNX Nifty High Frequency Trading domains. Hurst exponent and fractal dimension have been used to carry out this work. Results confirm conclusive evidence of predictability and herd behavior for both the indices. However, it has been observed that CNX Nifty High Frequency Trading domain (represented by its corresponding financial Reynolds number) is more predictable and has traces of significant herd behavior. The pattern of the predictability has been found to follow a quadratic equation.
-
Neural network time series prediction based on multilayer perceptron
Oleg Rudenko , Oleksandr Bezsonov , Oleksandr Romanyk doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/dm.5(1).2019.03Until recently, the statistical approach was the main technique in solving the prediction problem. In the framework of static models, the tasks of forecasting, the identification of hidden periodicity in data, analysis of dependencies, risk assessment in decision making, and others are solved. The general disadvantage of statistical models is the complexity of choosing the type of the model and selecting its parameters. Computing intelligence methods, among which artificial neural networks should be considered at first, can serve as alternative to statistical methods. The ability of the neural network to comprehensively process information follows from their ability to generalize and isolate hidden dependencies between input and output data. Significant advantage of neural networks is that they are capable of learning and generalizing the accumulated knowledge. The article proposes a method of neural networks training in solving the problem of prediction of the time series. Most of the predictive tasks of the time series are characterized by high levels of nonlinearity and non-stationary, noisiness, irregular trends, jumps, abnormal emissions. In these conditions, rigid statistical assumptions about the properties of the time series often limit the possibilities of classical forecasting methods. The alternative methods to statistical methods can be the methods of computational intelligence, which include artificial neural networks. The simulation results confirmed that the proposed method of training the neural network can significantly improve the prediction accuracy of the time series.