Investment needs assessment of Ukrainian agricultural enterprises

  • Received February 14, 2017;
    Accepted March 22, 2017;
    Published May 8, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Volodymyr Ulanchuk , Olena Zharun , Sergey Sokolyuk , Svetlana Tkachuk
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(1-1).2017.04
  • Article Info
    Volume 14 2017, Issue #1 (cont.), pp. 181-190
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    5 articles
  • 1213 Views
  • 461 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Agricultural enterprises in Ukraine require a considerable investment income. The paper studies the main problems and conditions for investment into agricultural enterprises, the scope and dynamics of their investment provision.

The results of agricultural enterprises activity depend directly on the state of their fixed assets. This is one of the biggest vulnerabilities of agricultural enterprises, which makes it impossible for the economy of Ukraine to demonstrate decent results. Investments should be used primarily for the development of material and technical basis of agricultural enterprises, because the fixed assets always depreciate, the term of their use in many enterprises exceeds 15 years and their number is constantly decreasing.

Investment in technical provision of plant growing is necessary and attractive. Firstly, as a basis of plant growing, grain and oilseeds are always in demand at the domestic and foreign markets. Secondly, the volumes of investments are moderate compared to other investments in agriculture. In the beginning, it is sufficient to invest into the branch on average from 1 to 2 thousand US dollars per 1 hectare. The average payback period of investments is 2-4 years.

Thus, in order to stimulate investments, it is vital to form a qualitatively new policy aimed at increasing investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Fig. 1. The fleet of tractors and combine harvesters in agricultural enterprises of Ukraine (end of the year), thousand units
    • Table 1. Selected indicators of the development of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine in 2010-2015
    • Table 2. Foreign direct investments (joint-stock capital) of the world’s countries into the Ukrainian economy (volumes of direct investments as of January 1), million US dollars
    • Table 3. Direct investments (joint-stock capital) to Ukraine from the world’s countries (volumes of direct investments as of January 1), million US dollars
    • Table 4. Foreign direct investments into agriculture, forestry and fishery from individual countries, million US dollars
    • Table 5. Investments into fixed assets of the agricultural sector, 2010-2015 (at the beginning of the year)
    • Table 6. Production of tractors, combine harvesters and agricultural machinery in Ukraine, units
    • Table 7. Purchasing of agricultural machinery in 2011-2013
    • Andrew Beattie. Retrieved from: A Primer For Investing In Agriculture / Investopedia.
    • Denysenko, M. P. (2003). Osnovy investytsiinoi diialnosti. Kyiv: Aleuta, 338 s.
    • Dopovid “Silske hospodarstvo Ukrainy v 2014 r.”
    • Employment in agriculture (% of total employment) [electronic resource], The World Bank.
    • Exploring agriculture investment.
    • Haidutsky, A. P. (2005). Investytsiina pryvablyvist ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky Ukrainy na mizhnarodnomu rynku kapitalu. Kyiv Natsionalnyi universytet im. T. Schevchenka, 20 s.
    • Heraimovych, V. L. (2014). Investytsiinyi proces ta ioho vplyv na ekonomichnyi rozvytok ahrarnoho sektoru. Zhytomyr, 20 s.
    • Hotra, V. V. (2015). Suchasnyi stan, faktory zapezpechennia ta napriamy aktyvizatsii investytsiinoi diialnosti u sferi silskoho hospodarstva. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 6, 114-121.
    • Hutkevych, S. O. (Ed.), Puhachov, M. I., Zavadskykh, H. M., Zanozovska, O. H. (2016). Stratehiia rozvytku: investytsiinyi vymir. Kharkiv, 17.
    • Hutkevych, S. S. (2004). Formuvannia investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky. Natsionalnyi naukovyi tsentr “Instutut ahrarnoi ekonomiky”, 31 s.
    • Impacts, challenges and opportunities of foreign agricultural investment.
    • Kernasiuk, Yu. (2015). Ohliad rynku tekhniky dlia APK.
    • Kisil, M. I. (2014). Suchasni vyklyky, stratehichni priorytety ta zavdannia schodo investytsiinoho zabezpechennia rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva. Innovatsiina ekonomika, 1, 14-19.
    • Kodenska, M. Yu., Nesterchuk, Yu. O. (2011). Investytsiina skladova ahrarno-promyslovoi intehratsii. Ekonomika APK, 3, 45-51.
    • Koval, L. M. (2015). Investytsiine kredytuvannia pidpryiemstv ahrarnoho sektoru. Ekonomika APK, 1, 35-40.
    • Labenko, O. M. (2008). Investytsiina diialnist silkskohospodarskykh pidpryiiemstv ta ii finansuvannia. Natsionalnyi ahrarnyi universytet, Kyiv, 19 s.
    • Levchenko, N. V., Ohlikh, V. V. (2012). Metody otsinuvannia investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti silskoho hospodarstva rehioniv Ukrainy v konteksti stratehichnoho planuvannia. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 8, 285-293.
    • Libor Krkoska. Foreign direct investment financing of capital formation in Central and Eastern Europe.
    • Lissitsa, A. (2011). Ukraina zatsikavlena v dovhostrokovykh investytsiiakh u silske hospodarstvo. Uriadovyi kurier, 98, 25.
    • Lupenko, O. Yu., Kisil, M. I. (Ed.). (2012). Stratehichni napriamy investytsiinoho zabezpechennia rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy na period do 2020 roku. NNCIAE, 66 s.
    • Lupenko, O. Yu., Mesel-Veselyak, V. Ya. (Ed.). (2012). Stratehichni napriamy rozvytku sislskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy na period do 2020 roku. K.: NNC “IAE”, 218 s.
    • Maslak, O. (2014). Rynok tekhniky: doroho, ale neobkhidno.
    • OECD Eurasia Competitiveness Programme.
    • Pavlenko, O. (2015). Dorozhnia karta reform ahrosektora.
    • Ratoshniuk, T. M., Martyniuk, M. A. (2013). Investytsiina pryvablyvist ahrarnoi sfery. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Finansy i kredyt, 1, 88-92.
    • Rekere, I., Kirkher, R., Naumenko, D. (2014). Promyslovyi sektor Ukrainy: analiz ta ostanni tendentsii
    • Sabluk, P. T., Kisil, M. I., Kodenska, M. Yu. (Ed.). (2005). Investytsiina pryvablyvist ahrarno-promyslovoho vyrobnytsva rehioniv Ukrainy. K.: NNCIAE, 478 s.
    • Sabluk, P., Shpykuliak, O., Kurylo, L. (2010). Innovatsiina diialnist v ahrarnii sferi: instutsionalnyi aspekt. Kyiv: NNC IAE, 706 s.
    • Salkova, I. Yu. (2015). Prioritetnyie napravleniia razvitiia ptitseproduktovoho podkompleksa. APK Ukrainy. Ekonomika. Finansy. Menedzhment: aktualnyie voprosy nauki i praktiki, 4, 35-41.
    • Silske hospodarstvo Ukrainy 2014. (2015). Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Kyiv, 379 s.
    • Statystychnyi schorichnyk Ukrainy za 2015 rik. (2016). Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy; Vidp. za vyp. Vyshnevska, O. A., Kyiv, 586 s.
    • Vasyliev, S. V., Sitkovska, A. O. (2010). Intensyvno-innovatsiina skladova rozvytky ahrarnoho vyrobnytsva. Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii “Stalyi rozvytok terytorii: problemy ta shliakhy vyrishennia”, 1-2 zhovtnia 2010 r. Dnipropetrovsk: DRIDU NADU, 124-126.
    • Vinichenko, I. I. (2010). Investytsiina diialnist ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv. Donetsk: Yuho-Vostok, 444 s.
    • Vyshnevska, O. M., Filatova, O. A. (2013). Investytsiina pryvablyvist silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv Ukrainy. Ekonomichnyi prostir, 72, 25-34.
    • Yurchyshyn, V. (2003). Kontseptualni osnovy rozrobky novitnioi ahrarnoi polityky ta ii realizatsii. Ekonomika APK, 8, 4-9.
    • Zakharchuk, O. V. (2014). Problemy materialno-tekhnichnoho zabezpechennia silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv Ukrainy. Ekonomika APK, 7, 92-99.
Related Articles

  • Formation of the investment environment in Ukraine in the context of European integration: an example of Poland

    Tetiana PonomarenkoORCID Researcher ID, Olena ZinchenkoORCID , Veronika KhudolieiORCID , Olha ProkopenkoORCID Researcher ID, Dariusz PawliszczyORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.30
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #1         pp. 361-373 Views: 1633 Downloads: 244 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    In the period of Ukraine’s integration into the European economic space, one of the basic conditions for achieving compliance with the European community requirements is the formation of favorable investment environment. In view of this, the aim of the article is to analyze the economic preconditions for the unification and adaptation of the investment mechanism in the period of Ukraine’s integration into the economic euro area, and to develop recommendations for unification of institutional support for the formation of the investment environment in Ukraine. In the course of the study, the system approach and the method of system analysis and synthesis are the basis. Based on the analysis of the activities in Poland, it is outlined that the conditions for their achievement of high rating indicators are the legally regulated mechanism for promoting investment, which includes relevant institutions, low tax rates, transparency and ease of doing business. The comparison made on this basis has made it possible to determine key differences and problems between approaches of European countries and Ukraine, namely: the lack of correspondence between the actual measures legally declared, the monetary unit instability, the unpredictability of the political and economic situation, the complexity of doing business. Approaches to unification of institutional support for the formation of the investment environment in Ukraine and measures aimed at increasing the efficiency and competitiveness of investment activity are proposed.

  • Material production and GDP in Ukraine: theoretical concept and financial assessment

    Yuliia SonkoORCID , Iryna LazebnaORCID , Larysa LebedevaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.05
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #2         pp. 51-59 Views: 1414 Downloads: 172 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The article considers the relevant problems concerning the correlation between the development of priority economic sectors and sustainable economic growth in Ukraine. The assumption is made that development at the macroeconomic level can only be achieved when the positive dynamics of material production sectors is observed. The resource potential of Ukraine allows to distinguish two main sectors: agriculture and industry.
    Many scholars have repeatedly considered ways of achieving positive economic dynamics at the level of the national economy. But despite the existing research on the problems of economic growth, its’ financial assessment and modelling, as well as the dominant factors of influence, remain unsolved. The aim of the article is to identify the factors of economic growth and assess their influence on the overall economic dynamics within two main material production sectors of Ukraine: industry and agriculture. In order to achieve this, the influence factor model of economic growth has been composed, where GDP growth was selected as a result indicator. The choice of influencing factors is substantiated by: quantity of goods and services sold, number of employees in the industry, investments, fixed assets value and the consumer price index. The most influential factors that significantly impact the overall economic dynamics have been revealed in the article.

  • Integrated evaluation of investment attractiveness in the context of economic sectors: Ukraine as a case study

    Iurii UmantsivORCID Researcher ID, Ivan CherlenjakORCID , Volodymyr PrikhodkoORCID , Yuliіa SonkoORCID , Maryna ShtanORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(2).2021.10
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 18, 2021         Issue #2         pp. 118-129 Views: 972 Downloads: 631 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study explores the evaluation of investment attractiveness of Ukraine’s economy. The following factors are analyzed: the social significance of the sector, the coefficient of support for the sectoral development, the coefficient of production efficiency, the index of fierce competition, and the inflation index. The results of applying the calculation of the average value of the weighting factor within a particular sector and the method of the sum of sets show that the most significant influence on the investment attractiveness of the economy sector are factors of economic efficiency and support of the sector by the state. The study is based on the development and calculation of an integrated indicator of sectoral attractiveness. This approach makes it possible to take into account a set of factors and more accurately describe the existing priorities of a particular sector of the economy. The conclusion is that that the most attractive sectors in Ukraine are industry, trade, transport and communications, as well as financial activities. The education sector remains the least attractive for investment. It is estimated that its attractiveness does not exceed 10% of the threshold. Unattractive for investments sectors will need special attention from the government. Correcting the current situation and attracting additional investment in such areas can significantly reduce the burden on the state budget. The findings of this investigation can be used in order to expand the existing tools for the formation of economic policy of Ukraine and improve the practice of evaluation of sectoral investment.

    Acknowledgements
    This article was prepared and funded within the research theme “Strategy of structural reorientation of Ukraine’s economy in the conditions of a pandemic” reg. No. 0121U109608 of Economic Theory and Competitive Policy Department of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics.

Download Preview
Close
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations