Estimating systematic risk for the best investment decisions on manufacturing company in Indonesia

  • Published March 31, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Zarah Puspitaningtyas
    ORCID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(1).2017.05
  • Article Info
    Volume 14 2017, Issue #1, pp. 46-54
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    4 articles
  • 1775 Views
  • 813 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Estimation of systematic risk is one of the important aspects of the best investment decisions. Through systematic risk prediction will be known risks to be faced by investors, because systematic risk is a measure of investment risk. In addition to returns, investors always consider the risk of investment, because investors are rational individuals, ie individuals who always consider the trade-off between return and risk. At a certain level of return, investors will tend to choose investments with the lowest risk level. Conversely, at a certain level of risk, investors tend to choose investments with the highest return rate. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the influence of the financial information on the systematic risk of stock manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange over a period of five years from January 2011 to December 2015. The financial information is measured in four accounting variables, i.e. financial leverage, liquidity, profitability, and firm size. The results of data analysis using multiple linear regression method to prove that at the 0.05 level only variable sized companies that significantly influence systematic risk. Meanwhile, the variable financial leverage, liquidity, and profitability does not affect the systematic risk. The results showed inconsistencies with the results of several previous studies. This inconsistency may be due to measurement problems variable accounting, the implementation period of the study, and the use of different research samples.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. The results of multiple linear regression analysis
    • Amato, L. H. and Amato, C. H. (2007). Retail Philanthropy: Firm Size, Industry, and Business Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 435-448.
    • Amato, L. H., and Amato, C. H. (2012). The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229-241.
    • Anjum, S. (2014). Systematic Risk Outliers and Beta Reliability in Emerging Economics: estimation-Risk Reduction with AZAM Regression. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(1), 288-302.
    • Artikis, P. G., and Nifora, G. (2013). Leverage Premium in a Southern European Frame. Journal of Computational Optimization in Economics and Finance, 5(1), 1-26.
    • Asgari, M. R., Pour, A. A. S., Zadeh, R. A., and Pahlavan, S. (2015). The Relationship Between Firm’s Growth Opportunities and Firm Size on Changes Ratio in Retained Earnings of Listed Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 10(3), 923-931.
    • Beaver, W. H. Kettler, P., and Scholes, M. (1970). The Association Between Market Determined And Accounting Determined Risk Measures. The Accounting Review, 654-682.
    • Belkaoui, A. (1978). Accounting Determinants of Systematic Risk in Canadian Common Stocks: a Multivariate Approach. Accounting and Business Research, 3-10.
    • Ben-Zion, U., and Shalit, S. S. (1975). Size, Leverage, and Dividend Record as Determinants of Equity Risk. The Journal of Finance, 30(4), 1015-1026.
    • Bera, A. K., and Kannan, S. (1986). An Adjustment Procedure For Predicting Systematic Risk. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1(4), pp. 317-332.
    • Bodie, Z., Kane, A., and Marcus, A. J. (2009). Investment. 8th edition. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    • Capstaff, J. (1992). The Usefulness of UK Accounting and Market Data for Predicting the Perceived Risk Class of Securities. Accounting and Business Research, 219-228.
    • Christie, A. A. (1982). The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variances: Value, Leverage, and Interest Rate Effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 407-432.
    • Chun, L. S. and Ramasamy, M. (1989). Accounting Variables as Determinants of Systematic Risk in Malaysian Common Stocks. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 6(2), 339-350.
    • Dhingra, H. L. (1982). The Impact of Accounting Variables on Stock Market Measures of Risk. Accounting And Business Research, 193-201.
    • Estrada, J. (2002). Systematic Risk in Emerging Markets: the D-CAPM. Emerging Marets Review, 3, 363-379.
    • Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. (2004). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 25-46.
    • Gahlon, J. M. (1981). Operating Leverage as a Determinant of Systematic Risk. Journal of Business Research, 9(2), 297-308.
    • Gahlon, J. M., and Gentry, J. A. (1982). On the Relationship Between Systematic Risk and the Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage. Journal of Financial Management, 11(2), 15-23.
    • Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic Econometric. 3th edition. McGraw-Hill Companies.
    • Gumanti, T. A. (2003). Can Accounting Information Act As A Proxy For Ex Ante Uncertainty In Initial Public Offerings? Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 5(2), 249-269.
    • Hamada, R. (1969). Portfolio Analysis, Market Equilibrium and Corporation Finance. Journal of Finance, 13-31.
    • Hamada, R. (1972). The Effect of the Firm’s Capital Structure on the Systematic Risk of Common Stocks. The Journal of Finance, 435-452.
    • Harianto, F., and Sudomo, S. (1998). Perangkat dan Teknik Analisis Investasi di Pasar Modal Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Bursa Efek Jakarta.
    • Hartono, J. (2008). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi. Edisi Kelima, Yogyakarta: BPFE.
    • Homan, A. (2006). The Impact of 9/11 on Financial Risk, Volatility and Returns of Marine Firms. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 8, 387-401.
    • Ismail, R. (2016). Impact on Liquidity Management on Profitability of Pakistani Firms: A Case of KSE-100 Index. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 14(2), 304-314.
    • Jami, M. and Bahar, M.N. (2016). Analysis of Profitability Ratios to Evaluation of Performance of Indian Automobile Industry. Journal of Current Research in Science, 747-755.
    • Lai, T. Y., and Stohs, M. H. (2015). Yes, CAPM Is Dead. International Journal of Business, 20(2), 144-158.
    • Mandelker, G. N., and Rhee, S. G. (1984). The Impact of The Degrees of Operating and Financial Leverage on Systematic Risk of Common Stock. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1(1), 45-57.
    • Mishra, S., and Modi, S. B. (2013). Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Leverage, and Idiosyncratic Risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 431-448.
    • Niresh, J. A. (2012). Trade-off Between Liquidity & Profitability: A Study Of Selected Manufacturing Firms in Sri Lanka. Researchers World, 3(4), 34-40.
    • Panwala, M. (2009). Dimension of Liquidity Management – a Case Study of the Surat Textile’s Traders Co-Operatve Bank LTD, Surat. National Journal of System and Information Technology, 2(1), 117-126.
    • Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2010). Manfaat Informasi Akuntansi Untuk Memprediksi Risiko Investasi Saham Berdasarkan Pendekatan Decision Usefulness. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 1(3), 467-488.
    • Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2011). Pembentukan Model Prediksi Risiko Investasi Saham Berdasarkan Decision Usefulness Approach of Accounting Information. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Call for Paper 2011: Kajian Penelitian Aktual Guna Pengembangan Teori Baru Bidang Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 43-58.
    • Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2012). Relevansi Nilai Informasi Akuntansi dan Manfaatnya Bagi Investor. Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 16(2), 164-183.
    • Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2015). Prediksi Risiko Investasi Saham: Decision Usefulness Approach. Yogyakarta: Griya Pandiva.
    • Putra, A. P., Lahindah, L., and Bambang, R. (2014). Financial Performance Analysis Before and After Global Crisis (Case Study in Indonesian Oil and Gas Sector for the Period of 2016-2011). Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(1), 42-51.
    • Radjev, A. (2013). Working Capital Management of Makson Healthcare PVT LTD: a Trade-off Between Liquidity and Profitability, an Empirical Study. International Refereed Research Journal, 4(3), 87-94.
    • Rubenstein, M. E. (1973). A Mean Variance Synthesis of Corporate Financial Theory. Journal of Finance, 167-181.
    • Scott, W. R. (2009). Financial Accounting Theory. 4rd edition, Toronto, Ontario: Prentice Hall, Inc.
    • Selva, M. (1995). The Association Between Accounting Determined Risk Measures and Analysts’ Risk Perceptions in a Medium-Sized Stock Market. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 207-229.
    • Shahzad, S. J. H. Ali, P. Ahmad, T., and Ali, S. (2015). Financial Leverage and Corporate Performance: Does Financial Crisis Owe an Explanation? Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 11(1), 67-90.
    • Sudarsono, R., Husnan, S., Tandelilin, E., and Ekawati, E. (2012). Time Varying Beta (Dual Beta): Conditional Market Timing CAPM. Manajemen & Bisnis, 11(2), 269 p.
    • Sufiyati. Na’im, A. (1998). Pengaruh Leverage Operasi Dan Leverage Finansial Terhadap Risiko Sistematik Saham: Studi Pada Perusahaan Publik Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 13(3), 57-69.
    • Sulistio, H. (2005). Pengaruh Informasi Akuntansi dan Non Akuntansi terhadap Initial Return: Studi pada Perusahaan Yang Melakukan Initial Public Offering di Bursa Efek Jakarta. SNA 8 Solo, 87-99.
    • Syamsuddin, L. (2007). Manajemen Keuangan Perusahaan (Konsep Aplikasi dalam: Perencanaan, Pengawasan, dan Pengambilan Keputusan). Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
    • Tandelilin, E. (1997). Determinants of Systematic Risk: The Experience of Some Indonesian Common Stock. Gadjah Mada University, 101-123.
    • Toth, M., Lancaric, D., Piterkova, A., and Savov, R. (2014). Systematic Risk in Agriculture: A Case of Slovakia. AGRIS On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 6(4), 185-193.
    • Zuhrohtun, Baridwan, Z. (2005). Pengaruh Pengumuman Peringkat Terhadap Kinerja Obligasi. SNA 8 Solo, 355-366.
Related Articles

  • Understanding the preference of individual retail investors on green bond in India: An empirical study

    Dhaval Prajapati , Dipen PaulORCID , Sushant MalikORCID Researcher ID, Dharmesh K. MishraORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(1).2021.15
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 18, 2021         Issue #1         pp. 177-189 Views: 2446 Downloads: 1017 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The biggest challenge facing countries, including India, is creating and managing an LCR (low carbon resilient) economy, which balances the need for high growth rates and is environmentally sustainable. The green bond market provides investors the means to help change the economy into an LCR economy. The study was undertaken to understand the key drivers and the factors influencing the individual retail investor’s decision to invest in green bonds. A survey instrument was designed and administered through the snowball sampling technique to 125 Indian respondents of various age groups who were eligible to invest in the Indian bond market. SPSS software was used to conduct a descriptive analysis followed by regression and conjoint analyses. The study results suggest that the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) rating and credit rating of the green bond issuers are the key factors that influence an individual’s investment decision. The findings also highlight that incentives such as tax exemptions and awareness of green bonds also affect an investor’s decision. This research stands out as one of the first attempts to understand the Indian retail investors’ perception of a green bond.

  • The mediating effect of investment decisions and financing decisions on the effect of corporate risk and dividend policy against corporate value

    Yulia Efni doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(2).2017.03
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017         Issue #2         pp. 27-37 Views: 1569 Downloads: 774 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study aims to determine the effect of mediation decisions on investment, and financing decisions influence the company’s risk and dividend policy on firm value. The unit of analysis in this research is company property and real estate sectors listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange continuously for 9 years (2001-2008) that have a complete financial report on the study period. This research study using descriptive analysis and inferentsial to prove examine the relationship between the study variables with the five structural models using WarpPLS. This study is basically to analyze the patterns of relationships between variables in order to determine the effect of directly or indirectly, a set of independent variables (exogenous) to the dependent variable (endogenous). The company’s risk and investment decisions are able to increase the value of the company, while the dividend policy and funding decisions are not able to increase the value of the company, the study was conducted at the companies in the sectors of property and real estate, then this study better developed for other sectors that have different characteristics. Originality from this research is the populations in this study were the companies in the sectors of property and real estate with specific criteria Indonesia and the data used in this study were secondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the form of financial statements.

  • On the causality analysis of the correlation between financial leverage and systematic risk: evidence from Indonesian Stock Exchange

    Ibnu QizamORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(4).2017.08
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017         Issue #4         pp. 73-89 Views: 1269 Downloads: 362 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This research is aimed at analyzing the causality puzzle on the correlation between financial leverage and systematic risk (beta). Financial leverage and beta are usually considered as two proxies of risk derived from different domains: one ends at financial decision outcome, and the other points to market. Cross-sectionally, this result does not support the moderating-variable impact of size on the relation between financial leverage and systematic risk. On the other hand, however, the moderating-variable impact of industry and operating leverage (to some extent) on the relation between financial leverage and systematic risk were well documented. Inter-temporally, financial leverage is significantly and symmetrically related to beta, not moderated by size and operating leverage. This means that the two variables show bidirectional causality. This study contributes to the new insight that financial leverage and beta are the two variables with bidirectional causality, showing that in the long run, risks from fundamental (financial/micro-economy) and from market (macro-economy) are tightly linked to each other inter-temporally.

Download Preview
Close
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations