Analyzing the effect of inward- vs. outward-looking activities on student loyalty in Japanese universities
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(3).2024.22
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2024, Issue #3, pp. 277-287
- 117 Views
-
20 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The increasing global competitiveness of university admissions has propelled the need to understand the critical factors underlying students’ loyalty. Although extensive research has been conducted on student loyalty, it focuses predominantly on student-centric activities, targeting only inward-looking measures aimed at students. In the corporate context, employees are considered the “second audience” for external marketing promotions, and the impact of these promotions on employee job satisfaction has been well researched. However, in the university context, little is known about how external policies affect student loyalty. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the influence of both inward- and outward-looking activities on student loyalty in Japanese universities. An online survey was conducted for 1,000 Japanese university students. The results of applying structural equation modeling to the survey data confirm the positive effect of inward-looking measures on student loyalty. Significant effects were found for lectures (β = 0.670, p-value < 0.000) and job hunting (β = 0.250, p-value < 0.000), while campuses also showed a positive effect (β = 0.148, p-value = 0.039). Among outward-looking measures, only celebrity endorsements contributed positively to loyalty (β = 0.136, p-value = 0.026), while sports and digital channel promotions had negative effects, contrary to expectations. This may be attributed to the reliance of sports on wins and losses and digital channel promotions often inducing feelings of envy when students observe others’ successes. Therefore, when university policymakers implement measures to strengthen their external brands, they must consider their impact on enrolled students.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, I21
-
References49
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Hypothetical model
-
- Table 1. Respondent attributes
- Table 2. Variable list
- Table 3. Results of confirmatory factor analysis
- Table 4. Results of structural equation modeling
-
- Aaker, D. A., & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000) Brand leadership. New York: The Free Press.
- Acito, F., & Ford, J. D. (1980). How advertising affects employees. Business Horizons, 23(1), 53-59.
- Agrawal, J., & Kamakura, W. A. (1995). The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: An event study analysis. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 56-62.
- Ahmed, O., Faisal, R. A., Sharker, T., Lee, S. A., & Jobe, M. C. (2022). Adaptation of the Bangla version of the COVID-19 Anxiety Scale. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(1), 284-295.
- Arrivabene, L. S., Vieira, P. R. D. C., & Mattoso, C. L. D. Q. (2019). Impact of service quality, satisfaction and corporate image on loyalty: A study of a publicly traded for-profit university. Services Marketing Quarterly, 40(3), 189-205.
- Asahi Shimbun. (2022). Universities in Japan continue trend of moving to urban areas.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
- Burger, R. (2017). Student perceptions of the fairness of grading procedures: a multilevel investigation of the role of the academic environment. Higher Education, 74(2), 301-320.
- Charles, D. (2016). The rural university campus and support for rural innovation. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 763-773.
- Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Consumer loyalty: Towards an integrated conceptual approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99-113.
- Dixon, H., Lee, A., & Scully, M. (2019). Sports sponsorship as a cause of obesity. Current Obesity Reports, 8, 480-494.
- Do, H., Ko, E., & Woodside, A. G. (2015). Tiger Woods, Nike, and I are (not) best friends: how brand’s sports sponsorship in social-media impacts brand consumer’s congruity and relationship quality. International Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 658-677.
- Feistauer, D., & Richter, T. (2017). How reliable are students’ evaluations of teaching quality? A variance components approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1263-1279.
- Fischer, E., & Hänze, M. (2019). Back from “guide on the side” to “sage on the stage”? Effects of teacher-guided and student-activating teaching methods on student learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 26-35.
- Gallais, B., Gagnon, C., Forgues, G., Côté, I., & Laberge, L. (2017). Further evidence for the reliability and validity of the Fatigue and Daytime Sleepiness Scale. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 375, 23-26.
- Gilly, M. C., & Wolfinbarger, M. (1998). Advertising’s internal audience. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 69-88.
- Hanson, T. A., Bryant, M. R., & Lyman, K. J. (2020). Intercollegiate athletic programs, university brand equity and student satisfaction. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 21(1), 106-126.
- Hu, H., Wang, C., Lan, Y., & Wu, X. (2022). Nurses’ turnover intention, hope and career identity: the mediating role of job satisfaction. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 1-11.
- Hussain, S., Melewar, T. C., Priporas, C. V., Foroudi, P., & Dennis, C. (2020). Examining the effects of celebrity trust on advertising credibility, brand credibility and corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 109, 472-488.
- Kankhuni, Z., Ngwira, C., Sepula, M. B., & Kapute, F. (2022). Modelling the relationship between higher education service quality, student engagement, attachment, satisfaction, and loyalty: a case of a Malawian public university. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 23(2), 229-252.
- Kato, T. (2023). Impact of offline and online lecture formats on student satisfaction with the university. Systems and Technologies, 355, 45-54.
- Kettunen, K., Alajoutsijärvi, K., Hunnes, J. A., & Pinheiro, R. (2022). Emergence and early institutionalization of competition in higher education: evidence from Finnish business schools. Tertiary Education and Management, 29, 365-389.
- Kim, E., Ratneshwar, S., & Thorson, E. (2017). Why narrative ads work: An integrated process explanation. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 283-296.
- Kim, J. G., Jeon, J., & Shin, W. S. (2021). The influence of forest activities in a university campus forest on student’s psychological effects. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2457.
- Loha, P., & Chowdhury, A. (2021). LinkedIn students: an extension of LinkedIn designed for college students to enhance their job-hunting experience. MartInnovation, Systems and Technologies, 221, 423-435.
- Lu, Y., & Song, H. (2020). The effect of educational technology on college students’ labor market performance. Journal of Population Economics, 33(3), 1101-1126.
- Malik, G., & Guptha, A. (2014). Impact of celebrity endorsements and brand mascots on consumer buying behavior. Journal of Global Marketing, 27(2), 128-143.
- Masserini, L., Bini, M., & Pratesi, M. (2019). Do quality of services and institutional image impact students’ satisfaction and loyalty in higher education? Social Indicators Research, 146(1), 91-115.
- Mause, K. (2009). Too much competition in higher education? Some conceptual remarks on the excessive-signaling hypothesis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 68(5), 1107-1133.
- Melović, B., Jocović, M., Dabić, M., Vulić, T. B., & Dudic, B. (2020). The impact of digital transformation and digital marketing on the brand promotion, positioning and electronic business in Montenegro. Technology in Society, 63, 101425.
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2023). Employment survey for people scheduled to graduate from universities in 2020.
- Morgan, A., Taylor, T., & Adair, D. (2020). Sport event sponsorship management from the sponsee’s perspective. Sport Management Review, 23(5), 838-851.
- Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657-683.
- Peterson-Horner, E., & Eckstein, R. (2015). Challenging the “Flutie Factor” Intercollegiate Sports, Undergraduate Enrollments, and the Neoliberal University. Humanity & Society, 39(1), 64-85.
- Schlesinger, W., Cervera, A., & Pérez-Cabañero, C. (2017). Sticking with your university: The importance of satisfaction, trust, image, and shared values. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2178-2194.
- Schulze-Cleven, T. (2020). Organizing competition: Regulatory welfare states in higher education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 691(1), 276-294.
- Selvaraj, A., Radhin, V., Nithin, K. A., Benson, N., & Mathew, A. J. (2021). Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102444.
- Severiens, S., Meeuwisse, M., & Born, M. (2015). Student experience and academic success: comparing a student-centred and a lecture-based course programme. Higher Education, 70(1), 1-17.
- Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2020). COVID-19 as an accelerator for digitalization at a German university: Establishing hybrid campuses in times of crisis. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(3), 212-216.
- Snijders, I., Wijnia, L., Rikers, R. M., & Loyens, S. M. (2019). Alumni loyalty drivers in higher education. Social Psychology of Education, 22(3), 607-627.
- Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A. M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D. M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1077-1088.
- Teixeira, P., Biscaia, R., & Rocha, V. (2022a). Competition for Funding or Funding for Competition? Analysing the Dissemination of Performance-based Funding in European Higher Education and its Institutional Effects. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 94-106.
- Teixeira, P. N., Silva, P. L., Biscaia, R., & Sá, C. (2022b). Competition and diversification in higher education: Analysing impacts on access and equity in the case of Portugal. European Journal of Education, 57(2), 235-254.
- Till, B. D. (1998). Using celebrity endorsers effectively: lessons from associative learning. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7(5), 400-409.
- Twum, K. K., Adams, M., Budu, S., & Budu, R. A. A. (2022). Achieving university libraries user loyalty through user satisfaction: the role of service quality. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 32(1), 54-72.
- Xu, F., & Du, J. T. (2018). Factors influencing users’ satisfaction and loyalty to digital libraries in Chinese universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 64-72.
- Yan, Q., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., & Chen, H. (2023). Exploring the impact of envy and admiration on social media fatigue: Social media loneliness and anxiety as mediators. Current Psychology, 42(20), 16830-16843.
- Yoshimi, S. (2020). Online university, pandemics and the long history of globalization. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 21(4), 636-644.
- Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). The current state and impact of Covid-19 on digital higher education in Germany. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 218-226.