The impact of celebrity politicians perceptions on political party preferences
-
Author(s)Maya A. BouNassifLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6587-7642
,
AlaaEldin AbassLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7927-4017
,
Amal Al KurdiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3945-7457
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(4).2022.16
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2022, Issue #4, pp. 189-200
- 484 Views
-
493 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Political parties usually try to understand the factors that affect a voter’s decision in elections. However, irrespective of voters’ preferences, studies rarely examine how voters’ attitudes toward celebrity politicians affected their party preferences, given the mediating effects of brand affinity and perceived attributes and the moderated mediating role of gender. Therefore, this study considers the effect of parties’ nominations of celebrity politicians on voters’ political party preference. Moreover, it investigates the causal relationship between those perceptions in an uprising nation against political parties.
A representative national sample of one thousand two hundred sixty-nine (1269) Lebanese voters was administered via a cross-sectional survey in fifteen Lebanese districts. A stratified proportional random sampling technique was used. Findings showed that attitudes significantly affected political party preferences when nominating celebrity politicians only through brand affinity on a 90% confidence level (probability-value = 0.053 < 0.10) and perceived attributes on a 95% confidence level (0.039 < 0.05), evidencing a lack of a significant direct relationship (0.571 > 0.10). Voters’ gender conditional indirect effect was significant for females’ impact on brand affinity (0.025 < 0.05), whereas gender failed to determine voters’ indirect effect on perceived attributes (0.633 > 0.10). The results have shown that gender disparities in the brand’s emotional component could affect brand preferences.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, D72, D74, D81, K16
-
References49
-
Tables6
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research model
-
- Table 1. Correlation analysis
- Table 2. Validity analysis
- Table 3. Regression weights
- Table 4. Mediating effects
- Table 5. Gender moderated mediation effects
- Table 6. Gender regression weights
-
- Abel, W., Kahn, E., Parr, T., & Walton, A. (2021). Introducing political philosophy: a policy-driven approach. Oxford University Press.
- Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
- Atallah, S., & Zoughaib, S. (2019). Lebanon’s parliamentary elections of 2018: seats, coalitions and candidate profiles (Policy Paper). The Lebanese Center for Policy Studies (LCPS).
- Atchison, A. L. (2021). Political science is for everybody: an introduction to political science. University of Toronto Press.
- Badaan, V., Richa, R., & Jost, J. T. (2020). Ideological justification of the sectarian political system in Lebanon. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 138-145.
- Baines, P., Fill, C., Rosengreen, S., & Antonetti, P. (2019). Marketing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Banerjee, S. (2021). On the relationship between online brand community and brand preference in political market. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 18(1), 27-55.
- Banerjee, S., & Chaudhuri, B. R. (2020). Factors shaping attitude of voters about celebrity politicians: direct and indirect effects. Journal of Business Research, 109, 210-220.
- Banerjee, S., & Chaudhuri, B. R. (2022). Brand love and party preference of young political consumers (voters). International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 19(3), 475-503.
- Bankert, A. (2020). Let’s talk about sexism: the differential effects of gender discrimination on liberal and conservative women’s political engagement. American Politics Research, 48(6), 779-791.
- Bisgaard, M. (2015). Bias will find a way: economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849-860.
- Brockington, D. (2014). Celebrity advocacy and international development. Routledge.
- Burden, B. C., & Klofstad, C. A. (2005). Affect and cognition in party identification. Political Psychology, 26(6), 869-886.
- Close, C., & Haute, E. (2020). Emotions and vote choice. Politics of the Low Countries, 2(3), 353-379.
- Cwalina, W., & Falkowski, A. (2015). Political branding: political candidates positioning based on inter-object associative affinity index. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2), 152-174.
- Dassonneville, R., Blais, A., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2015). Staying with the party, switching or exiting? A comparative analysis of determinants of party switching and abstaining. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 25(3), 387-405.
- De Vries, C. E., Hobolt, S. B., Proksch, S.-O., & Slapin, J. B. (2021). Foundations of European politics: a comparative approach. Oxford University Press.
- Dean, D., & Croft, R. (2009). Reason and choice: a conceptual study of consumer decision making and electoral behavior. Journal of Political Marketing, 8(2), 130-146.
- Dolan, K. (2008). Is there a “gender affinity effect” in American politics? Information, affect, and candidate sex in us house elections. Political Research Quarterly, 61(1), 79-89.
- Ebrahim, R., Ghoneim, A., Irani, Z., & Fan, Y. (2016). A brand preference and repurchase intention model: the role of consumer experience. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(13-14), 1230-1259.
- Gaskin, J. E. (2020). Structural equation modeling. Myeducator.
- Gidengil, E., Blais, A., Nadeau, R., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Women to the left? Gender differences in political beliefs and policy preferences. Women and Electoral Politics in Canada, 140-159.
- Johann, D., Königslöw, K. K.-V., Kritzinger, S., & Thomas, K. (2018). Intra-campaign changes in voting preferences: the impact of media and party communication. Political Communication, 35(2), 261-286.
- Kaur, H., & Sohal, S. (2022). Political brand endorsers, political brand preference, and political brand equity: a mediated moderated model. Journal of Marketing Communications, 28(1), 3-37.
- Kerr, A. D. (2021). Emotions, rationality, and gender. Gender Equality, 202-212.
- Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (2016). Psychology of prejudice and discrimination. Routledge.
- Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Brady, M., Goodman, M., & Hansen, T. (2019). Marketing management (4th ed.). Pearson.
- Krook, M. L., & O’brien, D. Z. (2010). The politics of group representation: quotas for women and minorities worldwide. Comparative Politics, 42(3), 253-272.
- Lindstaedt, N., & Frantz, E. (2019). Democracies and authoritarian regimes. Oxford University Press.
- Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016). Performing for the young networked citizen? Celebrity politics, social networking and the political engagement of young people. Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 400-419.
- Lönnqvist, J. E., & Ilmarinen, V.-J. (2021). Using a continuous measure of genderedness to assess sex differences in the attitudes of the political elite. Political Behavior, 43(4), 1779-1800.
- Mendick, H., Ahmad, A., Allen, K., & Harvey, L. (2018). Celebrity, aspiration and contemporary youth: education and inequality in an era of austerity. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Mulgan, R. G., & Aimer, P. (2004). Politics in New Zealand. Auckland University Press.
- National Democratic Institute. (2018). Lebanon 2018 Parliamentary Elections (Final Report).
- Norris, P. (2004). Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge University Press.
- Oberecker, E. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2011). Consumers’ emotional bonds with foreign countries: does consumer affinity affect behavioral intentions? Journal of International Marketing, 19(2), 45-72.
- Otjes, S. (2021). Between “eradicate all false religion” and “love the stranger as yourself”: how immigration attitudes divide voters of religious parties. Politics and Religion, 14(1), 106-131.
- Pavco-Giaccia, O., Little, M. F., Stanley, J., & Dunham, Y. (2019). Rationality is gendered. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 1-15.
- Rambocas, M., Kirpalani, V. M., & Simms, E. (2014). Building brand equity in retail banks: the case of Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 32(4), 300-320.
- Rehmert, J. (2020). Party elites’ preferences in candidates: evidence from a conjoint experiment. Political Behavior, 44, 1149-1173.
- Reibstein, D. J., Lovelock, C. H., & Dobson, R. D. P. (1980). The direction of causality between perceptions, affect, and behavior: an application to travel behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 370-376.
- Rose, R., & Peiffer, C. (2018). Bad governance and corruption. Springer.
- Shi, Y. (2022). Advances in big data analytics: theory, algorithms and practices. Springer Nature.
- Singh, V. P., Hansen, K. T., & Gupta, S. (2005). Modeling preferences for common attributes in multicategory brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 195-209.
- Sperling, V. (2014). Sex, politics, and Putin: political legitimacy in Russia. Oxford University Press.
- Street, J. (2019). What is Donald Trump? Forms of ‘celebrity’ in celebrity politics. Political Studies Review, 17(1), 3-13.
- Veselý, A. (2021). Autonomy of policy instrument attitudes: concept, theory and evidence. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 441-455.
- Wänke, M., Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Context effects in product line extensions: context is not destiny. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(4), 299-322.
- Wheeler, M. (2013). Celebrity politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
-
Adoption of Mobile Banking and Perceived Risk in GCC
Kavita Chavali ,
Ajith Kumar
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(1).2018.07
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 72-79 Views: 2482 Downloads: 580 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe study deals with the adoption of mobile banking services by respondents in UAE and the perception of risk factors by them. A model was developed on the Customer Adoption Process of mobile banking. The model is validated based on the data collected using the questionnaire from a sample of 90 respondents in UAE. Factor analysis is used to evaluate and analyze the responses. Belief in technology and the value it creates are the major driving force for respondents to adopt mobile banking. Respondents perceive that mobile banking helps in proper financial planning due to continuous monitoring the transactions and time saving. Lack of privacy in the mobile banking transactions and not all banks offering mobile banking services in UAE are the major challenges perceived by the respondents for non-adoption of mobile banking. Respondents identify time risk, financial risk and performance risk as the most predominant risk factors compared to other risks in the adoption process.
-
Challenges of finance accessibility by SMEs in the democratic republic of Congo: is gender a constraint?
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 40-50 Views: 1965 Downloads: 685 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSmall and medium enterprises (SMEs) play a significant role in income generation, job creation, poverty reduction and reducing income inequality of all countries, regardless of the level of development. Nevertheless, in developing countries, they are exposed to several challenges affecting their business operations and growth. Among others, access to external financing has been cited to be the most pressing challenge for SMEs in developing economies. The lack of accessibility has been indicated to result from the deficiencies observed from both financial institutions and SMEs. Further, it has been discovered that from the SMEs’ perspective, gender, among other entrepreneurial characteristics, has a role in accessing finance. This paper surveys a sample of 109 SMEs in the Democratic Republic of Congo not only to find what are the challenges faced in seeking finance, but also to investigate the extent to which gender impacts access to finance. The evidence gathered shows that finance is really constraining, there are more rejections than approvals of finance due to the lack of collateral, high interest rates and the inability of SMEs to develop attractive and bankable projects. With regards to gender, the findings were somehow assuring in the sense that when both women and men apply for external finance, they stand the same chances of accessing finance. Recommendations were established to all the actors. SMEs must put more effort into regulating their businesses in order to reduce their risks and build strong relationships with lenders. Financial institutions should not only reconsider the interest rates as they were perceived to be extremely high, but also train SMEs to be “more bankable”. Lastly, the Government should implement policies to support firms and render the business environment more appealing for both SMEs and financial institutions.
-
Ownership concentration, ownership identity, and bank performance
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 60-71 Views: 1741 Downloads: 441 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper examines whether ownership concentration and certain type of ownership can affect the financial performance of Lebanese banks. It uses longitudinal data from the largest 35 Lebanese banks over the period 2009–2014 and employs the panel regression model. The empirical results show that ownership concentration and certain type of shareholders play an important role in the area of corporate governance in Lebanese banks. In particular, bank financial performance is positively associated with ownership concentration, managerial ownership, and foreign and institutional ownerships; however, family ownership is not related to bank performance. Also, this paper shows that both ownership concentration and managerial ownership have a U-shaped relationship with bank performance. Several robustness tests largely confirm the findings, with important implications for policy-makers. The findings are crucial to policy-makers and bankers who are interested in tailoring good corporate governance principles for the Lebanese banking sector.
