Digital transformation as a moderator for green innovation and economic performance in the “twin transition”
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(2).2026.14
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #2, pp. 191-207
- 20 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The synergy between industrialization and environmental sustainability, known as the “twin transition,” has become a critical strategic imperative for emerging economies. This study aims to empirically examine the direct impact of green innovation on economic performance and the moderating role of digital transformation within the context of Vietnam. Data collected from a stratified random sample of 384 C-suite executives and senior managers within the manufacturing and service sectors across Vietnam’s key economic zones were analyzed using hierarchical linear regression. The quantitative analysis reveals that green innovation has a positive, moderate direct impact on economic performance (β = 0.24, p < 0.001). Furthermore, digital transformation demonstrates a strong independent direct effect on performance (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) and acts as a significant moderator (β = 0.19, p < 0.01). The inclusion of this interaction term significantly increased the model’s explanatory power (ΔR2 = 0.04, p < 0.01), providing statistical confirmation that firms with high digital capabilities realize substantially greater financial benefits from green investments compared to those with low digital maturity. Ultimately, these findings conclude that digital transformation is a dynamic capability that unleashes the financial value of sustainability strategies, offering a roadmap for integrated smart-green investments.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, O33, L25, M15
-
References64
-
Tables5
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
-
- Table 1. Respondent demographics
- Table 2. Summary of construct operationalization
- Table 3. Reliability and validity analysis
- Table 4. Hierarchical regression results (dependent variable: economic performance)
- Table A1. Questionnaire
-
- Agrawal, T. K., Kumar, V., Pal, R., Wang, L., & Chen, Y. (2021). Blockchain-based framework for supply chain traceability: A case example of textile and clothing industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 154, Article 107130.
- Ahmadov, T., Nguyen, Q. M., Leitão, J. C. C., Chen, Q., Nhan, D. T. T., Burman, V. L., & Zhu, B. (2026). What drives open innovation in Vietnamese manufacturing firms? Adaptive capacity at the nexus of strategy and orientation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 12(1), Article 100733.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
- Al Shaar, I. M., Khattab, S., Alkaied, R., & Al-Abbadi, L. (2022). Supply chain integration and green innovation, the role of environmental uncertainty: Evidence from Jordan. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 657-666.
- Alasoini, T. (2023). Twin transition as a transformer of work and an opportunity for development. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
- Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the field: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9(6), Article 1011.
- Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016). The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4912-4917.
- Bag, S., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2021). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge creation and B2B marketing rational decision making for improving firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 178-189.
- Barbero, J., Collado, L.A., Rodríguez-Crespo, E., & Santos, A. M. (2025). The twin transition in the European Union: Assessing regional patterns of EU-funded investments. European Planning Studies, 33(10), 1801-1821.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Bianchini, S., Damioli, G., & Ghisetti, C. (2023). The environmental effects of the “twin” green and digital transition in European regions. Environmental & Resource Economics, 84(4), 877-918.
- Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
- Carlos, R. L., & de Mattos, C. A. (2025). Blockchain-enabled integration of circular economy practices in supply chains: A conceptual framework. Business Strategy & Development, 8(3), Article e70222.
- Chau, V. T. (2025). Green finance and firm performance in Vietnamese enterprises: A review with a sustainable orientation. Global Academic Journal of Economics and Business, 7(3).
- Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
- Cirera, X., & Muzi, S. (2020). Measuring innovation using firm-level surveys: Evidence from developing countries. Research Policy, 49(3), 103912.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Demirel, P., Li, Q., Rentocchini, F., & Tamvada, J. P. (2019). Born to be green: New insights into the economics of eco-innovation. Small Business Economics, 53, 759-771.
- Dhir, A., Sadiq, M., Talwar, S., & Sakashita, M. (2021). Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, Article 102398.
- Dieguez, T., & Machado, J. (2025). Reviewing manufacturing execution system in Industry 4.0: A global approach. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Digital Transformation of Industrial Processes, 1(3).
- Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Doan, B. T. (2025). Green exports and sustainability trends in Vietnam’s international trade: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(1).
- Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., Wamba, S. F., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Can big data and predictive analytics improve the performance of sustainable supply chain? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 534-545.
- Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2021). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2741-2751.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F. V., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006). Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 3-14.
- Government of Vietnam. (2021). Quyết định số 1658/QĐ-TTg của Thủ tướng Chính phủ: Phê duyệt Chiến lược quốc gia về tăng trưởng xanh giai đoạn 2021 - 2030, tầm nhìn 2050 [Decision No. 1658/QD-TTg on approving the national strategy on green growth for the 2021-2030 period, with a vision to 2050]. (In Vietnamese).
- Gregori, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, Article 122817.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
- Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
- Hoang, V. H., Dong, V.-C., & Tran, T. M. T. (2026). Determinants of transforming to a circular economy: Evidence from a developing country. Sustainable Futures, 11, Article 101665.
- Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, Article 107831.
- Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, Article 120262.
- Lee, C. K. M., & Chung, S. Y. (2022). From Industry 4.0 to Supply Chain 4.0: A systematic review. Smart Manufacturing, 1(1), Article 2230002.
- Li, H., Wu, Y., Cao, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 700-712.
- Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), Article 103434.
- Muench, S., Stoermer, E., Jensen, K., Asikainen, T., Salvi, M., & Scapolo, F. (2022). Towards a green and digital future: Key requirements for successful twin transitions in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union.
- Ngo, T. Q., Doan, P. N., Vo, L. T., Tran, H. T. T., & Nguyen, D. N. (2021). The influence of green finance on economic growth: COVID-19 pandemic effects on Vietnam economy. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), Article 2003008.
- Nguyen, H. M., Nguyen, P. A., & Phung, N. B. H. (2022). Technological factors affecting green innovation: Evidence from the manufacturing sector in Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science – Economics and Business Administration, 12(1).
- Nguyen, H., & Hong, Y. (2025). National policy analysis of digital transformation in Vietnamese higher education: Conceptualising a three-layer model for implementation. Policy Futures in Education, 24(1), 35-58.
- Nguyen, N. P., & Adomako, S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure for eco-friendly practices, international orientation, and eco-innovation: A study of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 79-88.
- Nguyen, T. A., Le, P. H., Nguyen, H. D., Luong, T. C. T., & Ngo, M. T. (2023). The effect of environmental accounting information disclosure on financial performance of Vietnamese listed industrial firms: The moderating role of leverage and Big4. Can Tho University Journal of Economics, 15(2), 126-138.
- Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132.
- Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
- Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
- Psarommatis, F., May, G., Dreyfus, P.-A., & Kiritsis, D. (2022). Zero defect manufacturing: State-of-the-art review, shortcomings and future directions in research. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 1-17.
- Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135.
- Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, Article 119762.
- Ta, T. H. V. (2026, January 8). Macroeconomic determinants of circular economy growth: A comparative analysis of Germany and China. Tạp chí Công Thương.
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
- Tran, T. K. N., & Le, P. C. L. (2024). The impact of traceability and information sharing on the digital transformation of logistics: A study with Vietnamese textile and garment industry. In Twin transition: Digital transformation and green transition in businesses for sustainability (pp. 165-187). VNU University of Economics & Business.
- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144.
- Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., & West, M. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95-118.
- Wang, K.-H., Umar, M., Akram, R., & Caglar, E. (2021). Is technological innovation making world “greener”? An evidence from changing growth story of China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, Article 120516.
- Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349.
- Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Zanello, G., Fu, X., Mohnen, P., & Ventresca, M. (2016). The creation and diffusion of innovation in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(5), 884-912.
- Zhang, G., Gao, Y., & Li, G. (2023). Research on digital transformation and green technology innovation – Evidence from China’s listed manufacturing enterprises. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6425.
- Zhang, Q., & Ma, Y. (2021). The impact of environmental management on firm economic performance: The mediating effect of green innovation and the moderating effect of environmental leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292(4), Article 126057.
- Zonta, T., da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi, R., de Lima, M. J., da Trindade, E. S., & Li, G. P. (2020). Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 150, Article 106889.


