Is corporate social responsibility effective in improving environmental quality? Literature review
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.01
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2024, Issue #2, pp. 1-11
- 195 Views
-
56 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Considering continuing environmental degradation linked to economic activity, it seems essential to examine the role companies can play in implementing sustainable development. This study aims to analyze lessons learned from standard theories on the effectiveness of corporate social and environmental responsibility. Indeed, corporate social responsibility and state intervention are frequently compared under the dual lens of collective well-being and environmental quality. For some economists, corporate social responsibility is preferable to state intervention from the point of view of maximizing collective well-being. By contrast, according to some other authors, state intervention is more effective for both maximizing well-being and protecting the environment. This literature review shows that corporate social responsibility is theoretically no more effective than public intervention in environmental protection: companies can be encouraged to commit themselves to protecting the environment under restrictive conditions, but this does not eliminate the essential importance of public intervention. Analysis of the assumptions of neoclassical models shows that, in reality, they do not take into account all the properties of a public good, i.e., all the properties of the climate and the environment. Finally, the conditions for implementing CSR are incompatible with maximizing collective well-being, which explains why public intervention is theoretically preferable to CSR.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H41, H50, I31, Q58
-
References32
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Models on CSR and pubic intervention
- Table 2. Models on CSR and well-being
-
- Arora, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (1995). Towards a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 28(3), 289-309.
- Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. (2003). Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(3), 419-445.
- Baron, D. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics Management & Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.
- Baumol, W., & Lee, K. S. (1991). La théorie des marchés contestables [The theory of contestable markets]. Problèmes Économiques, 2243, 19-27. (In French).
- Baumol, W., Panzar, J., & Willig, R. (1982). Contestable Markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanitch.
- Beitone, A. (2014). Biens publics, bien collectifs [Public goods, Collective goods]. Revue du MAUSS Permanente. (In French).
- Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
- Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29(1), 25-49.
- Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2007). Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91(9), 1645-1663.
- Bodet, C., & Lemarche, T. (2007). La responsabilité sociale des entreprises comme innovation institutionnelle. Une lecture régulationniste [Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an institutional innovation. A regulationist view]. Revue de la Régulation, 1. (In French).
- Calveras, A., Gabuza, J.-J., & Llobet, G. (2007). Regulation, corporate social responsibility and activism. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 719-740.
- Chang, C., Li, C., & Lin, Y. (2019). The strategic incentive of corporate social responsibility in a vertically related market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 59, 88-97.
- Denicolo, V. (2008). A signaling model of environmental overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 293-303.
- Emezi, C. N. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on organization profitability. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(9), 60-67.
- Fanti, L., & Buccella, D. (2019). Pareto-superiority of corporate social responsibility in unionised industries. Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 19(2), 131-150.
- Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. New York Times.
- Hommel, T. (2004). Stratégie industrielle et contestation sociale [Industrial strategy and contestation]. Cemagref, Cirad, Ifremer, INRA. (In French).
- Innes, R. (2004). A theory of consumer boycotts under symmetric information and imperfect competition (Working Paper No. 2004-12). Cardon Research Papers.
- Kaul, A., & Jiao, L. (2015). The economic case for CSR: The competitive advantage of for-profit firms in the market for social goods. Alliance for Research in Corporate Sustainability.
- King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmentalism and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105-116.
- Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51-84.
- Kotchen, M. J. (2006). Green markets and private provision of public goods. Journal of Political Economy, 114(4), 816-845.
- Lyon, T. P., & Kim, E. H. (2007). Greenhouse gas regulation or greenwash? The DOE’s 1605b program. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Maxwell, J. W., Lyon, T. P., & Hackett, S. C. (2000). Self-regulation and social welfare: The political economy of environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 583-617.
- Millock, K., & Salanié, F. (2003). Collective environmental agreements: An analysis of the problems of free-riding and collusion. Fondazione Eni Enrico Matte.
- Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97-118.
- Salanié, F., & Treich, N. (2008). Entreprises socialement responsables: Quel sens, quel avenir? [Socially responsible companies: What meaning, what future?] Horizons Stratégiques, 1(7), 182-195. (In French).
- Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.
- Videras, J., & Alberini, A. (2000). The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: Which firms participate and why? Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(4), 449-460.
- Vogel, D. (2008). Le marché de la vertu: Possibilités et limites de la responsabilité sociale des entreprises [The Virtue Market: Opportunities and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility]. Economica, Paris. (In French).
- Warr, P. G. (1983). The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income. Economics Letters, 13(2-3), 207-211.
- Williamson, O. (1981). The modern corporation: Origin, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4), 1537-1568.