Towards sustainable development in a transition economy: The case of eco-industrial parks in Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.13
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2021, Issue #1, pp. 149-164
- Cited by
- 769 Views
-
182 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Sustainable development for transition economies is an opportunity to accelerate and complete socio-economic transformations and at the same time an additional responsibility in situations of instability and uncertainty. The chances for strengthening sustainability are growing within the organized innovation space, which makes it possible to model scenarios of ecologically oriented development and, with the help of state and international support, to start their implementation. The paper aims to analyze the possibilities and directions of creating eco-industrial parks in a transition economy. It uses an innovative helix model in its triple, quadruple and quintuple variations for functioning and sustainable development of industrial parks in Ukraine.
The study adopts a descriptive comparative analysis of data on the planning and implementation of economic, primarily environmentally relevant, activities. Based on the analysis and description of exogenous factors, in particular within GEIPP, a SWOT table on the potential of eco-industrial parks was formed. The directions of development of industrial, technological, and scientific parks in Ukraine are determined using the quintuple helix model on the plane of “knowledge-innovation”, in particular on quadruple helix transition to sustainability through the simultaneous development of socially oriented and environmental activities. Within the legislation, it is proposed to approve a sustainable form of artificially separated innovation parks, namely the “eco-industrial park”. One of the conditions for advanced sustainable development in Ukraine is the creation of a national program to support the transformation of innovation parks into their environmental versions 2.0 and 3.0, as well as investing in greenfield eco-industrial parks.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L16, Q56, Q57
-
References59
-
Tables3
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Relationship between the concept of sustainable development and helix modeling
- Figure 2. Quintuple helix model as a stable knowledge platform for innovative eco-industrial development
- Figure 3. Quadrants of landscaping in innovation parks of Ukraine on the plane “knowledge – innovation” according to the stages of helix modeling
- Figure 4. Institutional support for the development of ecologically relevant knowledge within the framework of the landscaping of innovation parks in Ukraine
-
- Table 1. SWOT-analysis of EIP development in Ukraine
- Table A1. Ecologically relevant and scientific-educational activities of industrial parks by regions of Ukraine, 2021
- Table A2. Main aspects of IP included in the Register of industrial parks as of November 12, 2020, under the Ukrainian legislation
-
- Aid, G., Eklund, M., Anderberg, S., & Baas, L. (2017). Expanding roles for the Swedish waste management sector in inter-organizational resource management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 124, 85-97.
- Al-Quradaghi, S., Zheng, Q. P., & Elkamel, A. (2020). Generalized Framework for the Design of Eco-Industrial Parks: Case Study of End-of-Life Vehicles. Sustainability, 12(16), 6612.
- Bellantuono, N., Carbonara, N., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). The organization of eco-industrial parks and their sustainable practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 362-375.
- Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2014). Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: Arts, democracy, and innovation in Quadruple Helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3, 12.
- Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The quintuple helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 2.
- Cu, T. T., & Nguyen, T. A. (2021). Development of industrial parks and a new livelihood strategy for the people in Vietnam. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 221-230.
- Daddi, T., Tessitore, S., & Testa, F. (2015). Industrial ecology and eco-industrial development: Case studies from Italy. Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal, 9(3), 217-233.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
- EU-Ukraine civil society platform. (2021). Ekonomika, Dovkillia, Osvita. Mozhlyvi Tochky Rostu Dlia Ukrainy? [Economy, environment, education. Are there any points of growth for Ukraine?]. (In Ukrainian).
- Farel, R., Charrière, B., Thevenet, C., & Yune, J. H. (2016). Sustainable manufacturing through creation and governance of eco-industrial parks. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 138(10), 101003.
- Fu, Y., Zhu, Y., Lin, L., Gao, D., & Ma, Y. (2019). Comparison and Analysis of Evaluation Indexes regarding China’s Eco-Industrial Parks. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 310(5), 052069.
- Gómez, A. M. M., González, F. A., & Bárcena, M. M. (2018). Smart eco-industrial parks: A circular economy implementation based on industrial metabolism. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 58-69.
- Goyal, S., Chauhan, S., & Mishra, P. (2021). Circular economy research: A bibliometric analysis (2000–2019) and future research insights. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125011.
- Greenberg, D. A., & Rogerson, J. M. (2014). The greening of industrial property developments in South Africa. Urbani Izziv, 25, 122-133.
- Hong, H., & Gasparatos, A. (2020). Eco-industrial parks in China: key institutional aspects, sustainability impacts, and implementation challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 122853.
- Kechichian, E., & Jeong, M. H. (2016). Mainstreaming eco-industrial parks. The World Bank Group.
- Kim, H. W., Dong, L., Choi, A. E. S., Fujii, M., Fujita, T., & Park, H. S. (2018). Co-benefit potential of industrial and urban symbiosis using waste heat from industrial park in Ulsan, Korea. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 225-234.
- Kitsios, F., Kamariotou, M., & Grigoroudis, E. (2021). Digital entrepreneurship services evolution: Analysis of quadruple and quintuple helix innovation models for open data ecosystems. Sustainability, 13(21), 12183.
- Laguna, N. E., & Durán-Romero, G. (2017). Science parks approaches to address sustainability: A qualitative case study of the science parks in Spain. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 38-55.
- Litifu, Z., & Nagasaka, K. (2015). Comprehensive functions of eco-industrial park in conserving energy and improving ecology. 2015 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems (ICAMechS).
- Lopes, M. S. G. (2015). Engineering biological systems toward a sustainable bioeconomy. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 42(6), 813-838.
- Lowe, E. (2001). Eco-industrial Park Handbook for Asian Developing Countries Report to Asian Development Bank.
- Machado, H. V., Lazzarotti, F., & Bencke, F. F. (2018). Innovation models and technological parks: interaction between parks and innovation agents. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 13(2), 104-114.
- Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (2021). Industrialni parky v Ukraini [Industrial parks in Ukraine]. [Presentation]. (In Ukrainian).
- Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. (n.d.). Industrial Parks in Ukraine.
- Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2021a). Naukovi Parky [Science parks]. (In Ukrainian).
- Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2021b). Tekhnolohichni PARKY [Technology parks]. (In Ukrainian).
- Park, J. M., Park, J. Y., & Park, H. S. (2016). A review of the National Eco-Industrial Park Development Program in Korea: Progress and achievements in the first phase, 2005–2010. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 33-44.
- Paula, E. V. D., & Abreu, M. C. S. D. (2019). Pressures from the context and institutional capacity building to develop industrial symbiosis networks. Gestão & Produção, 26(4), e3831.
- Peng, H., Shen, N., Liao, H., & Wang, Q. (2020). Multiple network embedding, green knowledge integration and green supply chain performance – Investigation based on agglomeration scenario. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120821.
- Petrushenko, M., Shevchenko, H., Burkynskyi, B., & Khumarova, N. (2019). A game-theoretical model for investment in inclusive recreation and wellness in Ukraine: the regional context. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(4), 382-394.
- Shevchenko, H., Pakhomov, V., & Petrushenko, M. (2016). Economic and legal issues of rural and recreational land use in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 156(1-2), 54-58.
- Silva, C., Lackoová, L., & Panagopoulos, T. (2017). Applying sustainable techniques in eco-industrial parks. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, 210, 135-145.
- Social Seeds. (2018). Methodology and good practices on quintuple helix cooperations. Making better use of social entrepreneurship collaborations in policy improvements.
- The Government Portal. (2021). Uriad skhvalyv tsili klimatychnoi polityky Ukrainy do 2030 roku [The government has approved the goals of Ukraine’s climate policy until 2030]. (In Ukrainian).
- The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1999). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro spetsialnyi rezhym innovatsiinoi diialnosti tekhnolohichnykh parkiv” [Law of Ukraine “On the special mode of innovative activity of technology parks”]. (In Ukrainian).
- The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2009). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro naukovi parky” [Law of Ukraine “On science parks”]. (In Ukrainian).
- The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2013). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro industrialni parky” [Law of Ukraine “On industrial parks”]. (In Ukrainian).
- The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2017). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro otsinku vplyvu na dovkillia” [Law of Ukraine “On environmental impact assessment”]. (In Ukrainian).
- The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2018). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro stratehichnu ekolohichnu otsinku” [Law of Ukraine “On Strategic Environmental Assessment”]. (In Ukrainian).
- The World Bank. (2018). Eco-industrial parks emerge as an effective approach to sustainable growth.
- United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2016). Global assessment of eco-Industrial parks in developing and emerging countries.
- United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2017). Implementation handbook for eco-industrial parks.
- United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2018). Global Eco-Industrial Parks Programme (GEIPP) in developing and transition countries.
- United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (n.d.a). GEIPP Ukraine Project.
- United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (n.d.b). Industrial parks: Rejecting the trade-off between economic growth and the environment.
- United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (n.d.c). Eco-industrial parks.
- United Nations Ukraine. (n.d.). Our work on the sustainable development goals in Ukraine.
- Van Beers, D., Tyrkko, K., Flammini, A., Barahona, C., & Susan, C. (2020). Results and Lessons Learned from Assessing 50 Industrial Parks in Eight Countries against the International Framework for Eco-Industrial Parks. Sustainability, 12(24), 10611.
- Veleva, V., Todorova, S., Lowitt, P., Angus, N., & Neely, D. (2015). Understanding and addressing business needs and sustainability challenges: Lessons from Devens eco-industrial park. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 375-384.
- Wang, Q., Deutz, P., & Chen, Y. (2017). Building institutional capacity for industrial symbiosis development: A case study of an industrial symbiosis coordination network in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 1571-1582.
- World Bank Group. (2019). Enhancing China’s regulatory framework for eco-industrial parks. Comparative analysis of Chinese and international green standards.
- Yune, J. H., Tian, J., Liu, W., Chen, L., & Descamps-Large, C. (2016). Greening Chinese chemical industrial park by implementing industrial ecology strategies: A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 54-64.
- Zeng, D. Z. (2019). Building a competitive city through integrating into global value chains: The case of the Sino–Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park. China: An International Journal, 17(2), 164-180.
- Zeng, H., Chen, X., Xiao, X., & Zhou, Z. (2017). Institutional pressures, sustainable supply chain management, and circular economy capability: Empirical evidence from Chinese eco-industrial park firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155(2), 54-65.
- Zhang, C., Romagnoli, A., Zhou, L., & Kraft, M. (2017). Knowledge management of eco-industrial park for efficient energy utilization through ontology-based approach. Applied Energy, 204, 1412-1421.
- Zheng, K., & Jia, S. (2017). Promoting the opportunity identification of industrial symbiosis: Agent-based modeling inspired by innovation diffusion theory. Sustainability, 9(5), 765.
- Zhou, L., Zhang, C., Karimi, I. A., & Kraft, M. (2017). J-Park Simulator, an intelligent system for information management of eco-industrial parks. Energy Procedia, 142, 2953-2958.
- Zhou, L., Zhang, C., Karimi, I. A., & Kraft, M. (2018). An ontology framework towards decentralized information management for eco-industrial parks. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 118, 49-63.