Forest resource security in Ukraine: assessment and provision
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.10(1).2019.08
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2019, Issue #1, pp. 105-112
- Cited by
- 521 Views
-
147 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The activities of forestry enterprises suffer from ecological and economic conflicts of interest that are long- and short-term in nature. As a result, productive forest stands are depleted and forest ecosystem sustainability is reduced. Therefore, this article is aimed at justifying recommendations to evaluate and ensure forest resource security. The article also defines the essence of forest resource security as qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the forest fund that ensure the desired level of economic efficiency of the forestry subject to rational use of forest resources, maintaining the quality of the forest ecosystem and performing all other functions of the forest.
Based on the functional and process approach, the methodology of forest-resource safety assessment has been developed, which considers main features of forestry activities and provides for the definition of an integral index of forest resource security as the sum of three groups of indices. The methodology was tested in the context of four forestry enterprises of Volyn and Rivne regions (Ukraine). The results reveal a high level of forest resource security. However, the study identified many problems and, on that basis, the proposals were made to improve forestry practical activities. The results obtained can be considered as the basis for developing environmental policy and taking current and strategic management decisions to ensure the sustainable development of forestry enterprises.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)О13, Q23
-
References16
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Indices of forest resource security assessment
- Table 2. The interval scale of the enterprise ecological security indices
- Table 3. Outputs to assess the forestry enterprises’ forest resource security
- Table 4. Local indicators of forestry enterprises’ forest resource security for 2017
- Table 5. Indices of forestry enterprises’ forest resource security
- Table 6. Group and integral indices of forest resource security of forestry enterprises
-
- Antonenko, I. Ya. (2008). Ekoloho-ekonomichni priorytety modernizatsii liso- resursnoho kompleksu Ukrainy: makroekonomichni vazheli [Ecological and economic priorities of the forest-resource complex modernization in Ukraine: macroeconomic levers]. Kyiv: KUTEP-INFORM (in Ukrainian).
- Artiushok, V. S. (2012). Kryterii vidpovidnosti diialnosti lisohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv stratehichnii tsili v umovakh staloho rozvytku [Criteria for the compliance of forestry enterprises with the strategic objective in the context of sustainable development]. Scientific Proceedings of the National University Ostroh Academy: Economy, 19, 95-98. (In Ukrainian).
- Cherchyk, L., Shershun, M., Khumarova, N., Mykytyn, T., & Cherchyk, A. (2019). Assessment of forest enterprises’ performance: integrating economic security and ecological impact. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(4), 1784-1797.
- Dovbnya, S., & Gichova, N. (2008). Diahnostyka ekonomichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva yak instrument vyznachennia napriankiv yoho innovatsiinoho rozvytku [Diagnostics of economic security of the enterprise as a tool for determining the direction of its innovative development]. Economic Newsletter of the NMU, 3(23), 36-42. (In Ukrainian).
- FAO. (2001). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 – main report (FAO Forestry Paper No. 140). Rome.
- Harrington, E. C. (1965). The Desirability Function. Industrial Quality Control, 21(April), 494-498.
- Hliebov, M. M. (2008). Metodychni pytannia formuvannia optymalnoi lisystosti v suchasnykh umovakh [Methodical issues of formation of optimal afforestation under modern conditions]. Ukrainskyi Naukovo-Doslidnyi Instytut Lisovoho Hospodarstva ta Ahrolisomelioratsii. Lisivnytstvo i ahrolisomelioratsiia – Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Agroforestry. Arboriculture and agroforestry, 112, 43. (In Ukrainian).
- Holmgren, P., & Persson, R. (2002). Evolution and prospects of global forest assessments. International Journal of Forestry and Forest Industries, 53(3).
- Koval, Ya. (2012) Priorytety ekolohichnoho ta zbalansovanoho lisoresursnoho rozvytku [Priorities of ecological and balanced forest resource development]. Economist, 12, 49-51. (In Ukrainian).
- Loehle, C., MacCracken, J. G., Runde, D., & Hicks, L. (2002). Forest management at landscape scales – Solving the problems. Journal of Forestry, 100(6), 25-33.
- Lytsur, I. M. (2010). Ekoloho-ekonomichni problemy prostorovoi orhanizatsii lisovoho kompleksu Ukrainy [Ecological and economic problems of spatial organization of forest complex in Ukraine]. Kyiv: RVPS Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- Mishenina G. A. (2010). Ekoloho-ekonomichni zasady rozvytku pidpryiemstva v lisoresursnii sferi [Ecological and economic foundations of entrepreneurship development in forestry] (Dissertation as manuscript). Sumy: Sumy State University. (In Ukrainian)
- Stepanenko, M. A. (Ed.) (2015). Lisovyi kompleks Ukrainy u formati staloho rozvytku ekonomiky [Forestry complex of Ukraine in the format of sustainable economic development]. In Problemy modernizatsii lisoresursnoi sfery u konteksti prostorovoho rozvytku – Problems of modernization of forest resource sphere in the context of spatial development. Kyiv: RVPS Ukrainy NAN Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
- Strange, N., Jacobsen, J., & Thorsen, B. (2019). Afforestation as a real option with joint production of environmental services. Forest Policy and Economics, 104, 146-156.
- Wolfslehner, B., & Vacik, H. (2008). Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(1), 1-10.
- Yarova, I. Y., Mishenina, N. V., & Pizniak, T. I. (2018). Space analysis of reproduction of the forest potential: ecological and economic aspect. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 406-418. (In Ukrainian).