A comparative study of Islamic conformity, profitability, and green performance in Southeast Asian Islamic banks
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.20(1).2025.15
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2025, Issue #1, pp. 174-190
- 42 Views
-
10 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Southeast Asian countries, as members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), hold the second-largest Sharia financial assets globally. This study aims to assess the comparative performance of Islamic banks across ASEAN, examine the relationship between Islamic conformity, profitability, and green banking practices, and compare performance indicators between Malaysian and Indonesian Islamic banks. The sample includes Islamic banks from Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, Thailand, and the Philippines. The findings reveal consistent adherence to Sharia principles across all banks, demonstrating strong Islamic conformity. However, financial performance indicators such as Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Net Profit Margin (NPM) show significant variability, reflecting differences in operational efficiency and profitability. Green banking practices positively correlate with profitability, particularly ROA and NPM, emphasizing the role of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives in enhancing operational efficiency and customer loyalty. The comparative analysis highlights that while both Malaysian and Indonesian Islamic banks exhibit consistent Islamic conformity, Malaysian banks outperform their Indonesian counterparts in green banking practices and profitability. This advantage is attributed to Malaysia’s advanced regulatory environment, which promotes sustainable finance, whereas Indonesian banks face greater profitability variability, necessitating improved governance and operational strategies. These findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, showcasing how Islamic financial principles can integrate with sustainability practices to achieve profitability and environmental responsibility in Islamic banking.
Acknowledgment(s)
The authors extend their gratitude to the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia for funding this research and to the Research and Community Service Centre of Universitas Mercu Buana for their valuable support.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, M41, Q56
-
References42
-
Tables6
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Research analysis flowchart
- Figure 2. Quadrant graph performance analysis
- Figure 3. Islamic conformity vs profitability
- Figure 4. Green banking vs profitability
- Figure 5. Islamic conformity vs green banking
-
- Table 1. Population and sample
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Average bank performance for the period 2018–2023
- Table 4. Consistency of banks in Quadrant 2 (URQ)
- Table 5. Pearson сorrelation
- Table 6. Comparative – Independent sample t-test
-
- Alam, A. W., Banna, H., & Hassan, M. K. (2022). Esg Activities and Bank Efficiency: Are Islamic Banks Better? Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 8(1), 65-88.
- Alharbi, A. T. (2017). Determinants of Islamic banks’ profitability: international evidence. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 10(3), 331-350.
- Amuda, Y. J., & Al-Nasser, S. A. (2024). Exploring encounters and prodigies of Islamic banks in non-Muslim states: towards enhancing regulatory frameworks of Islamic banking system. International Journal of Law and Management.
- Anggraini, D., Aryani, D. N., & Prasetyo, I. B. (2019). Analisis Implementasi Green Banking Dan Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Profitabilitas [Analysis of Green Banking Implementation and Financial Performance on Profitability]. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen an Infromatika – Journal of Business, Management and Informatics, 1(2), 141-161. (In Indonesian).
- Arimiko, H., Mukhzarudfa, & Wahyudi, I. (2020). Analisis Kinerja Bank Syariah Menggunakan Sharia Conformity and Profitability (SCNP) Model dan Sharia Maqashid Index (SMI) pada Bank Umum Syariah (BUS) di Asia Tenggara Periode 2014–2018 [Analysis of Islamic Bank Performance Using the Sharia Conformity and Profitability (SCNP) Model and Sharia Maqashid Index (SMI) at Islamic Commercial Banks (BUS) in Southeast Asia for the Period 2014–2018]. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Universitas Jambi, 5(4), 228-242. (In Indonesian).
- Athari, S. A., & Bahreini, M. (2023). The impact of external governance and regulatory settings on the profitability of Islamic banks: Evidence from Arab markets. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 28(2), 2124-2147.
- Athief, F. H. N., Zaky, R. A., Virgiawan, R., Fathoni, M. A., & Rofiqo, A. (2024). Capturing Islamic Bank Performance in Indonesia During the Covid-19 Crisis: Rgec and Scnp Approaches. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(2), 15-29.
- Azizah, M., & Nengzih, N. (2021). Financial Performance Analysis of Sharia Banks in Indonesia and Malaysia Using Dupont System. Saudi Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(1), 28-38.
- Azzahra, T. F., Sholahuddin, M., & Soepatini, S. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Islamic Banks’ Performance in Indonesia and Malaysia with RGEC and the Islamicity Performance Index (2018–2021). Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(1), 261-272.
- Chowdhury, M. A. M., & Haron, R. (2021). The efficiency of Islamic Banks in the Southeast Asia (SEA) Region. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1-16.
- Djalilov, K., & Piesse, J. (2016). Determinants of bank profitability in transition countries: What matters most? Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 69-82.
- Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari`ah, Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(1), 25-45.
- Gulzar, R., Bhat, A. A., Mir, A. A., Athari, S. A., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2024). Green banking practices and environmental performance: navigating sustainability in banks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(15), 23211-23226.
- Güney, N. (2024). Maqāsid al-Sharī’a in Islamic Finance: A Critical Analysis of Modern Discourses. Religions, 15(1), 1-15.
- Hassan, M. K., Sohel, M. N. I., Choudhury, T., & Rashid, M. (2024). A systematic literature review of risks in Islamic banking system: research agenda and future research directions. Risk Management, 26(1), 3.
- Ismail, N., Anridho, N., Isa, M. A. M., Rahman, N. H. A., & Ismail, N. (2022). Corporate Sustainability and Firms’ Financial Performance: Evidence from Malaysian and Indonesian Public Listed Companies. International Journal of Economics and Management, 16(2), 213-224.
- Jihadi, M., Vilantika, E., Sholichah, F., & Arifin, Z. (2021). Best Sharia Bank in Indonesia: An Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 13(1), 92-106.
- Julia, T., & Kassim, S. (2020). Exploring green banking performance of Islamic banks vs conventional banks in Bangladesh based on Maqasid Shariah framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(3), 729-744.
- Ledhem, M. A., & Mekidiche, M. (2020). Economic growth and financial performance of Islamic banks: a CAMELS approach. Islamic Economic Studies, 28(1), 47-62.
- Maghfuriyah, A., Ferdous Azam, S. M., & Shukri, S. (2019). Market structure and Islamic banking performance in Indonesia: An error correction model. Management Science Letters, 9(9), 1407-1418.
- Mansour, W., Ajmi, H., & Saci, K. (2022). Regulatory policies in the global Islamic banking sector in the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Banking Regulation, 23(3), 265-287.
- Meena, R. (2017). Green Banking Practices: Initiative for Sustainable Development. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3, 2016-2017.
- Meutia, I., Adam, M., & Wardhani, R. S. (2019). Does sharia compliance affect Islamic Banks performance? Evidence from Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 7(3), 12.
- Mohammed, M. O., & Taib, F. M. (2015). Developing Islamic Banking Performance Measures Based on Maqasid Al-Shari’ah Framework: Cases of 24 Selected Banks. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 1(1), 55-78.
- Nalliboyina, S. B., & Chalam, G. V. (2023). Factors Determining the Financial Performance of Public Sector Banks in India. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 23(14), 57-71.
- Nathania, R., & Ekawati, E. (2024). Banking on ESG: How ownership influences financial outcomes in 5-ASEAN countries. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(3), 121-132.
- Ningsih, N. W., Hanif, H., & Iqbal, F. (2020). Green Banking Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia [Green Banking on the Profitability of Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia]. Jurnal Ilmiah Keuangan Dan Perbankan – Scientific Journal of Finance and Banking, 3(2), 86-99. (In Indonesian).
- Nomran, N. M., & Haron, R. (2021). Financial Performance in Islamic Banking and Shari’ah Supervision under Interventionist Regulatory Approach: A System-GMM Dynamic Panel Analysis. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(1), 59-86.
- Nugroho, L., Utami, W., & Sugiarti, D. (2023). Tawhid String Relation and Itsar Concept of Islamic Bank in Covid-19 Pandemic on Value Creation Perspective (Indonesia Evidence). BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies, 5(1), 1-18.
- Paryadi. (2021). Maqashid Syariah: Definisi Dan Pendapat Para Ulama [Maqashid Syariah: Definition and Opinions of Scholars]. Cross-Border, 4(2), 201-216. (In Indonesian).
- Pawar, D. S., & Munuswamy, J. (2022). The linkage between green banking practices and green loyalty: A customer perspective. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(3), 201-212.
- Qabajeh, M., Almajali, D., Natour, A. R. Al, Alqsass, M., & Maali, H. (2023). The impact of operational risk on profitability: Evidence from banking sector in the MENA region. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(4), 1459-1466.
- Rahma, P. N. M., & Wedari, L. K. (2024). Green Banking and Bank Performance in ASEAN: The Moderating Role of Bank Size. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(9), 162-181.
- Saleem, A., Daragmeh, A., Zahid, R. M. A., & Sági, J. (2024). Financial intermediation through risk sharing vs non-risk sharing contracts, role of credit risk, and sustainable production: evidence from leading countries in Islamic finance. In Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(5), 11311-11341.
- Saydaliev, H. B., & Chin, L. (2023). Role of green financing and financial inclusion to develop the cleaner environment for macroeconomic stability: Inter-temporal analysis of ASEAN economies. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(6), 3839-3859.
- Setyawati, I., Suroso, S., Suryanto, T., & Nurjannah, D. S. (2017). Does financial performance of Islamic banking is better? Panel data estimation. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2), 592-606.
- Shah Khan, M. M., Ijaz, F., & Aslam, E. (2014). Determinants of Profitability of Islamic Banking Industry: An Evidence from Pakistan. Business & Economic Review, 6(2), 27-46.
- Sufian, F., & Kamarudin, F. (2015). Determinants of revenue efficiency of Islamic banks: Empirical evidence from the Southeast Asian countries. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 8(1), 36-63.
- Utami, W., Setiany, E., Hidayah, N., & Azhar, Z. (2024). Sustainability Reporting Quality and Corporate Value: Indonesia and Malaysia Context. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e2239.
- Vilantika, E., & Handayani, A. (2023). Islamic Social Responsibility and Islamic Corporate Governance in Influence Financial Performance Using Sharia Conformity and Profitability. LAA MAISYIR: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 10(2), 155-171.
- Yakob, N. A., & Hasan, N. A. (2021). Exploring the interaction effects of board meetings on information disclosure and financial performance in public listed companies. Economies, 9(4), 139.
- Zhang, H., & Wei, S. (2024). Green finance improves enterprises’ environmental, social and governance performance: A two-dimensional perspective based on external financing capability and internal technological innovation. PLoS ONE, 19, 1-22.