Risk management through a Kohonen map bank business model survey: The case of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(2).2024.18
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2024, Issue #2, pp. 221-233
- Cited by
- 224 Views
-
58 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this paper is to identify the peculiarities of banks’ business models and assess their risks, which is especially relevant in the context of the war in Ukraine since 2014. The information base is the published statements for each month of 63 Ukrainian banks for the period from 1 January 2018 to 1 January 2024. The number of indicators is chosen in an empirical manner. Business models are investigated using the method of structural-functional groups of banks, which allows estimating large arrays of financial indicators, grouping banks with similar characteristics and drawing conclusions about the main risks. It is convenient to use neural networks, namely Kohonen’s self-organizing maps, to estimate large data sets. The largest group of banks places a significant part of assets in government securities and has an unstable resource base. The share of these banks in the system as of January 1, 2024 is 38% and total assets are 10%. The second group by number of banks is focused on corporate lending with a high share of current resources in liabilities, and includes 21% of banks, whose assets account for 31% of total assets. State-owned banks, PrivatBank and OschadBank, account for 35% of total assets. The business models of these banks are characterized by dependence on retail funds, a high share of investment operations, and high credit and currency risks. Ukraine’s banking system has significantly developed a risk-oriented approach to management, which allowed it to maintain stability in the face of a full-scale war.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C45, G21, G17
-
References37
-
Tables5
-
Figures9
-
- Figure 1. Kohonen map as of January 1, 2024
- Figure 2. Distribution of values of the loan portfolio structure indicators
- Figure 3. Distribution of investment portfolio structure indicators
- Figure 4. Distribution of values of the legal persons’ liability structure indicators
- Figure 5. Distribution of indicator values of the natural persons’ liability structure
- Figure 6. Distribution of indicator values of banks’ profitability sources
- Figure 7. Dynamics of Ukrainian banks’ average profitability indicators
- Figure 8. Example of concentration of the highest level of SAFN and SPFN indicators of individuals’ attracted and placed funds in the group of retail banks
- Figure 9. Example of concentration of the highest level of indicators of interbank funds attracted by SPMI and reserves RA in a group of problem banks
-
- Table 1. SFGB indicators as of January 1, 2024, %
- Table 2. Indicators of the asset structure as of January 1, 2024
- Table 3. Indicators of the structure of liabilities as of January 1, 2024
- Table 4. Characteristics of SFGBs as of January 1, 2024
- Table 5. Other indicators of bank clustering as of January 1, 2024
-
- Acharya, V., & Pedersen, L. H. (2005). Asset pricing with liquidity risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 375-410.
- Arzhevitin, S., Bortnikov, G., Bublyk, Y., & Lyubich, O. (2023). Uplyv voiennoho stanu na produktyvnist bankivskoho sektora Ukrainy [Impact of martial state on the performance of the Ukrainian banking sector]. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 23-41. (In Ukrainian).
- Azarenkova, G., Dziubliuk, O., Korneev, V., Golovko, O., & Onishchenko, I. (2022). Diagnostics оf transparency оf Ukrainian banking institutions using multivariate analysis methods. Scientific Horizons, 25(8), 85-105.
- Da Silva, I. N., Spatti, D. H., Flauzino, R. A., Liboni, L. H. B., & dos Reis Alves, S. F. (2017). Self-Organizing Kohonen Networks. In Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 157-172). Cham: Springer.
- Davydenko, N., Boiko, S., Cherniavska, O., & Nehrey, M. (2023a). Analysis of the impact of state-owned banks on the sustainability of the public finances. Economies, 11(19), 229.
- Davydenko, N., Lutsyk, Y., Buriak, A., & Vovk, L. (2023b). Informational and Analytical Systems for Forecasting the Indicators of Financial Security of the Banking System of Ukraine. Journal of Information Technology Management, 15(2), 1-13.
- Druhov, O., & Druhova, V. (2022). Banking system in Ukraine 2022: Before and in the Wartime. Bezpieczny Bank, 1, 33-48.
- Gelhausen, M. Ch. (2010). A nested logit-model based on Kohonen’s Self-Organizing Maps for airport and access mode choice in Germany. Innovative Marketing, 6(2), 48-68.
- Greuning, H. V., & Bratanovic, S. B. (2009). Analyzing Banking Risk: A Framework for Assessing Corporate Governance and Risk Management (3rd ed.). World Bank Publications.
- Hryckiewicz, A., & Kozłowski, Ł. (2017). Banking business models and the nature of financial crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 71, 1-24.
- Hsieh, M.-F., & Lee, C.-C. (2020). Bank Liquidity Creation, Regulations, and Credit Risk. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 49(3), 368-409.
- Jing, D. (2019). Financial system modeling using deep neural networks (DNNs) for effective risk assessment and prediction. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 356(8), 4716-4731.
- Kaminskyi, A., Nehrey, M., Babenko, V., & Zimon, G. (2022). Model of Optimizing Correspondence Risk-Return Marketing for Short-Term Lending. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 583.
- Kasianenko, V., Kasianenko, T., & Kasaeva, J. (2020). Investment potential forecast and strategies for its expansion: case of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(1), 329-347.
- Köhler, M. (2014). Business Models in Banking – How Did They Evolve and How Do They Need to Be Changed in the Post-Crisis Period? Journal of Financial Perspectives, 2(1).
- Kohonen, T. (2013). Essentials of the self-organizing map. Neural Networks, 37, 52-65.
- Kozmenko, S., Shkolnyk, I., & Bukhtiarova, A. (2016). Dynamics patterns of banks evaluations on the basis of Kohonen self-organizing maps. Banks and Bank Systems, 11(4-1), 179-192.
- Kozmenko, S., Shpyga, F., & Voloshko, I. (2003). Strategic bank management: textbook (734 p.). Sumy: University Book.
- Kravchuk, I. (2023). The banking system of Ukraine in wartime. Humanities and Social Sciences, 30(3).
- Kuznetsova, A., Samorodov, B., Azarenkova, G., Oryekhova, K., & Babenko, M. (2020). Operational control over the financial stability of Banking. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(1), 51-58.
- Merk, M., Rijkstel, A., & Gonzalez, E. (2012). Business models of international banks in the wake of the 2007–2009 global financial crisis. Banco de España. Estabilidad Financiera, (22), 99-121.
- Mints, A. (2018). Neural network methods for forecasting the reliability of Ukrainian banks. Neuro-Fuzzy Modeling Techniques in Economics, 7(1), 74-85.
- Mishchenko, V., & Naumenkova, S. (2022). Bank’s operational risk management mechanisms improvement. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, 25(53), 102-109.
- National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). (2023). Supervisory Data.
- Onyshchenko, Y., & Zaiats E. (2020). Determination of bank business model types in Ukrainian banking system. Eastern Europe: Economics, Business and Governance, 4(27), 125-132. (In Ukrainian).
- Pagliari, S., Briault, C., Milne, A., Jackson, P., Pryce, V., Llewellyn, D. T., Beck, T., & Lascelles, D. (2012). Future Risks and Fragilities for Financial Stability (SUERF Studies No. 2012/3). SUERF – The European Money and Finance.
- Peykani, P., Sargolzaei, M., Botshekan, M., Oprean-Stan, C., & Takaloo, A. (2023). Optimization of Asset and Liability Management of Banks with Minimum Possible Changes. Mathematics, 11(12), 2761.
- Rose, P. (2000). Bank Management (526 p.). M.: Delo LLC.
- Samorodov, B., Azarenkova, G., Golovko, O., Oryekhova, K., & Babenko, M. (2019). Financial stability management in banks: strategy maps. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(4), 10-21.
- Shkolnyk, I., Mentel, U., Bukhtiarova, A., & Dushak, M. (2020). The trajectories of companies’ financial architecture in the real economy. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(1), 119-133.
- Shorokh, V. (2021). Improving the system of quantitative indicators for risk assessment of financial companies. Development Management, 19(1), 1-9.
- Tarasevych, N. (2021). Actual Aspects of Risk Management System in Banks of Ukraine. Modern Economics, 28, 134-139.
- Vasylieva, T., Dudchenko, V., Samusevych, Y., Marci, A., & Sofronov, V. (2022). The impact of governance quality on central bank’s independence. Public and Municipal Finance, 11(1), 113-127.
- Zarutska, E., Pavlov, R., Pavlova, T., Pawliszczy, D., & Kuchmacz, B. (2020). Main characteristics of business models and risk profile of Ukrainian banks. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(33), 15-22.
- Zarutska, E., Pavlova, T., & Sinyuk, A. (2018). Structural-functional analysis as innovation in public governance (case of banking supervision). Marketing and Management of Innovations, 9(4), 349-360.
- Zarutska, O., Novikova, L., Pavlov, R., Pavlova, T., & Levkovich, O. (2022). Evaluation of Ukrainian banks’ business models by the structural and functional groups analysis method. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(45), 8-20.
- Zomchak, L., & Nehrey, M. (2022). Economic Growth and Capital Investment: The Empirical Evidence. In Hu, Z., Zhang, Q., Petoukhov, S., & He, M. (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Systems for Logistics Engineering. ICAILE 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (vol. 135). Cham: Springer.