Clustering of banks by the level of digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.17(1).2022.07
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2022, Issue #1, pp. 80-93
- Cited by
- 1074 Views
-
328 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The COVID-19 pandemic has complicated the operating environment for banks around the world. Determining the drivers of digitalization of banking services based on the principles of corporate social responsibility of banks makes it possible to find a way out of the crisis. The objective of the study is to develop a model for clustering banks in terms of the level of digitalization on the principles of corporate social responsibility.
In this study, a twofold model has been proposed: the first part includes the calculation of the level of digitalization of banking, and the second part includes mathematical simulation of the clustering of bank digitalization level. This study reveals new possible solutions to the digitalization of banking in the face of new threats. In particular, factor analysis identifies the main factors, cluster analysis ranks banks into three categories (A, B, C) of service digitalization, and a dendrogram identifies digitalization drivers. The model was tested on 22 banks. Eight per cent of the banks are rated A “Very good” and B “Good”. 92% have Level C “Satisfactory”. The results of the study prove that the model should be validated. It should be confirmed that the application of the developed methodology for increasing the digitalization of banking services will increase customer loyalty by 15%, improve sustainability by reducing risk by 10%, and make banks attractive for investment by 15-20%.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D21, G21, M15
-
References42
-
Tables4
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. Development level calculation of banking digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
- Figure 2. Model for banking digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
- Figure 3. Listing of the factor analysis results of digitalization level indicators of Ukrainian banks for 2020–2021
- Figure 4. Listing of the cluster analysis results of digitalization level for Ukrainian banks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic using CSR principles for 2020–2021
- Figure 5. Banks in the third cluster
- Figure 6. Dendrogram to identify the activators of the banking digitalization level in Ukraine in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic based on CSR principles for 2020–2021
-
- Table 1. Description of the substantive and methodological differences between traditional remote banking and digital banking
- Table 2. Initial data to build a model for banking digitalization in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic based on CSR principles
- Table А1. Key stages in the digitalization evolution of banking business models
- Table B1. Calculation data for digitalization components of corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian banks for 2019–2021
-
- Al-Husein, M., & Sadi, M. A. (2015). Preference on the Perception of Mobile Banking: A Saudi Arabian Perspective. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 4(1), 161-172.
- Alkhaldi, A. N., & Kharma, Q. M. (2019). Customer’s Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking Services: The Moderating Influence of Demographic Factors. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(5), 1-26.
- ALraja, M. N., & Aref, M. (2015). Customer Acceptance of E-Commerce: Integrating Perceived Risk with TAM. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 13(2), 913-921.
- Amit R., & Zott C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41-49.
- Baabdullah, A. M., Abdallah, A., Rana, N. P., Kizgin, H., & Patil, P. (2019). Consumer Use of Mobile Banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an Integrated Model. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 38-52.
- Bakar, A., Lee, R., & Hashim, N. H. (2013). Parsing religiosity, guilt and materialism on consumer ethics. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 4(3), 232-244.
- Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 418-430.
- Björkdahl J., & Holmen M. (2013). Business model innovation – the challenges ahead. International Journal of Product Development, 18(3-4), 213-225.
- Bollas-Araya, H.-M., & Seguí-Mas, E. (2014). Sustainability reporting in cooperative banks an analysis of their disclosure in Europe. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 115, 30-56.
- Buriak, A., Vozňáková, I., Sułkowska, J., & Kryvych, Y. (2019). Social trust and institutional (Bank) trust: Empirical evidence of interaction. Economics and Sociology, 12(4), 116-129.
- Burmeister, C., Lüttgens, D., & Piller, F. T. (2016). Business model innovation for Industrie 4.0: Why the “Industrial Internet” mandates a new perspective on innovation. Die Unternehmung, 72(2), 124-152.
- Chaouali, W., Souiden, N., & Ladhari, R. (2017). Explaining adoption of mobile banking with the theory of trying, general self-confidence, and cynicism. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 57-67.
- Dhote, T., Pathak P., & Kulkarni P. (2020). Coping with the challenges posed by GAFA and other digital disruptors: Can advanced technologies help the banking sector? International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 2196-2199.
- Gandolfo, A. (2020). Content shared between banks and users on the social ecosystem: An inductive exploratory inquiry. Electronic Commerce Research, 20(4), 679-712.
- Gangi, F., Mustilli, M., Varrone, N., & Daniele, L. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Banks’ Financial Performance. International Business Research, 11(10), 42-58.
- Goularte, A. C., & Zilber, S. N. (2020). The Moderating Role of Cultural Factors in the Adoption of Mobile Banking in Brazil. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(1), 63-81.
- Hąbek, P., & Wolniak, R. (2016). Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Quality & Quantity, 50, 399-420.
- Hong, I. B. (2019). Understanding and Predicting Behavioral Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking: The Korean Experience. Journal of Global Information Management, 27(3), 182-202.
- Iwu-Egwuonwu, R. (2020). Does Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Impact on Firm Performance? A Literature Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Kabir, R., & Thai, H. (2017). Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance? Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 227-258.
- Khan, M., Halabi, A., & Samy, M. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting: A Study of Selected Banking Companies in Bangladesh. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 344-357.
- Kolodiziev, O., Gontar, D. (2014). Scenario modeling of the Bank’s Market value strategic management. Economic Annals-XXI, 9-10, 19-23.
- Leon, M. V. De. (2019). Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention to Use Mobile Banking among Retail Banking Clients. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 3(2), 118-137.
- Lin, H.-F. (2011). An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. International Journal of Information Management, 31(3), 252-260.
- Malyarets, L. M., Barannik, I. O., Sabadash, L. O., & Grynko, P. O. (2019). Modeling the Economic Sustainability of the Macro System (for Example Ukraine). Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(3), 23-35.
- Mohammadi, H. (2015). A study of mobile banking loyalty in Iran. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 35-47.
- Mohd, S., & Kaushal, V. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility in Banking Sector: A Literature Review. International Journal of Business, Management and Allied Sciences, 6(2), 22-39.
- Murthy, S. R., & Mani, M. (2013). Discerning rejection of technology. SAGE Open, 3(2), 1-10.
- Muzurura, J., & Chigora, F. (2019). Consumer’s Behavioral Intention to Adopt Mobile Banking in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa Using an Extension of Technology Acceptance Model: Lessons from Zimbabwe. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 6(6), 316-334.
- Nobanee, H., & Ellili, N. O. (2016). Corporate Sustainability Disclosure in Annual Reports: Evidence from UAE Banks: Islamic versus Conventional. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 1336-1341.
- Ramdani, B., Rothwell, B., & Boukrami, E. (2020). Open banking: The emergence of new digital business models. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 17(5), 2050033.
- Raza, S. A., Shah, N., & Ali, M. (2018). Acceptance of Mobile Banking in Islamic Banks: Evidence from Modified UTAUT Model. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 10(1), 357-376.
- Selcuk, E. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration in Turkey. Sustainability, 11(13), 1-10.
- Shcherbak, V., Gryshchenko, I., Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L., Nifatova, O., Tkachuk, V., Kostiuk, T., & Hotra, V. (2021). Using a sharing-platform to prevent a new outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in rural areas. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 7(2), 155-170.
- Shcherbak, V., Nifatova, О., Kuzheliev, M., Erkes, O., & Mylashko, O. (2019). The assessment of corporate social responsibility at Ukrainian banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(3), 140-151.
- Singh, S., & Srivastava, R. (2018). Predicting the Intention to Use Mobile Banking in India Introduction. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(2), 357-378.
- Szegedi, K., Khan, Y., & Lentner, C. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistani Listed Banks. Sustainability, 12(10), 1-19.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
- Ventre, I., & Kolbe, D. (2020). The Impact of Perceived Usefulness of Online Reviews, Trust and Perceived Risk on Online Purchase Intention in Emerging Markets: A Mexican Perspective. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 32(4), 1-13.
- Walker, M. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance (Ph.D. Thesis). Faculty of Business Administration of Capella University, Minnesota, USA.
- Yehorycheva, S., Kolodiziev, O. & Prasolova, S. (2017). Actual Problems of the Ukraine’s Banking System Capital Stability Management. Banks and Bank Systems, 12(2), 60-67.